It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
depends on how big the creatures are. If these are very tiny martians, this could be a very large city. it's all relative.
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by arianna
Hint: Does the layout look like a large city?
I don't really see a city.
If I did see a city, wouldn't it be a small city?
The way I see it, total domination of these beings would not be difficult. In fact I think we could do it with Curiosity. Just imagine if a thing that huge landed on earth.
Originally posted by butcherguy
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
depends on how big the creatures are. If these are very tiny martians, this could be a very large city. it's all relative.
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by arianna
Hint: Does the layout look like a large city?
I don't really see a city.
If I did see a city, wouldn't it be a small city?
Agreed, I was speaking from my perspective, since I am not a tiny Martian.
I still see rocks.
sort of but not really. I think more like mechagodzilla with 6 wheels but bigger. Man, what I would give to just get a glimpse of the NASA tech that is being used to destroy these things.
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by ZetaRediculian
indeed.
We would freak the eff out!
Kind of like the movie 'Independence Day'.
Originally posted by arianna
These images are png versions and there are no compression artifacts on the image, just the detail on the surface.
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
sort of but not really. I think more like mechagodzilla with 6 wheels but bigger. Man, what I would give to just get a glimpse of the NASA tech that is being used to destroy these things.
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by ZetaRediculian
indeed.
We would freak the eff out!
Kind of like the movie 'Independence Day'.
Originally posted by senselessness
Originally posted by arianna
These images are png versions and there are no compression artifacts on the image, just the detail on the surface.
No compression artifacts???? The ORIGINAL IMAGES had compression artifacts on them already! There is no possible way to remove the artifacts... So get out of here with your lies!
Originally posted by arianna
The question was kept on the NASA server for over 6 months.
Originally posted by arianna
You are just looking at the large object.
Have a very close look at the surface detail in the vicinity of the rock and you may be pleasantly amazed.
Hint: Does the layout look like a large city?
Originally posted by spoor
Originally posted by arianna
You are just looking at the large object.
Have a very close look at the surface detail in the vicinity of the rock and you may be pleasantly amazed.
Hint: Does the layout look like a large city?
So your "large city" is just made of rocks on the lunar surface... that look just like rocks.
Originally posted by arianna
A city that that is constructed to appear as small rocks is an ideal camouflage wouldn't you say?
Originally posted by spoor
Originally posted by arianna
A city that that is constructed to appear as small rocks is an ideal camouflage wouldn't you say?
Except that there is no city, only rocks.
Originally posted by senselessness
reply to post by arianna
You are claiming your images don't have compression artifacts simply because they were saved as a lossless .png format. However, images straight from Mars Curiosity are already compressed! You can't take an already compressed image with clear compression artifacts, save them as a a lossless .png, and then claim there are no compression artifacts... So what you claim is an outright lie.edit on 7-9-2012 by senselessness because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by senselessness
reply to post by arianna
If you are being serious, and you expect people to believe there are micro beings on Mars building little human-like cities out of the rocks no larger than 12 inches tall... I think you just might need to see a mental health specialist. I am really being sincere.
Originally posted by senselessness
reply to post by arianna
If you are being serious, and you expect people to believe there are micro beings on Mars building little human-like cities out of the rocks no larger than 12 inches tall... I think you just might need to see a mental health specialist. I am really being sincere.
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Originally posted by senselessness
reply to post by arianna
If you are being serious, and you expect people to believe there are micro beings on Mars building little human-like cities out of the rocks no larger than 12 inches tall... I think you just might need to see a mental health specialist. I am really being sincere.
OH arianna has been told that before
Originally posted by arianna
Back in late 2009 I wrote, in the form of a question, to the NASA astrobiologist David Morrison explaining what I had found by accident on a rock that Opportunity had come across. I explained that a group of objects showing on this particular rock was definite evidence that a very tiny intelligent species is resident on Mars. The question was kept on the NASA server for over 6 months. Unfortunately, a reply to the question was never received therefore, I can only assume that Mr. Moririson did not want to commit himself in the form of a written reply.
.