It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by frequentflyer
Originally posted by milominderbinder
Originally posted by frequentflyer
Originally posted by freakjive
To that end, write in Ron Paul if a write-in vote will be counted in your state. If Ron Paul endorses someone, vote for him. Otherwise, vote Gary Johnson (or your favored third party candidate).
This advice is going to create a divide in the votes by three. Good article otherwise. But why would we not want to vote for the same thing? So because not every state counts write-ins then what we're going to need is to vote for either Johnson or Paul's endorsement. If Paul would endorse Johnson, then that might be ideal. Someone else posed the idea of Paul as Johnson's vice. This idea would take the risk of divided votes out of the equation completely. Anybody see it possible?
On another note -- how does the impeachment process work again?
That would certainly be the most logical approach...wouldn't it?
Aww look at you and your condescending approach. Feel better?
Originally posted by woodwardjnr
Why is there not enough people in America to form a respectable 3rd party that can challenge the duopoly. It takes people to start these things, they are not going to come around by magic.
Originally posted by woodwardjnr
Sorry I'm an outsider, so forgive my ignorance, but why didn't Ron Paul run as an Independent. There is clearly a demand in America for a 3rd party, but RP ran under the Republican banner. Surely he must of known he could never take on the GOP establishment and gain the nomination. He did however, manage to get a lot of independents who would not normally join the Republicans to join up just to back his cause. So I wonder who really won here.
Originally posted by woodwardjnr
Sorry I'm an outsider, so forgive my ignorance, but why didn't Ron Paul run as an Independent. There is clearly a demand in America for a 3rd party, but RP ran under the Republican banner. Surely he must of known he could never take on the GOP establishment and gain the nomination. He did however, manage to get a lot of independents who would not normally join the Republicans to join up just to back his cause. So I wonder who really won here.
Originally posted by Ahabstar
Here, let me un-spin this article:
The Huffington Post (a fairly liberal leaning publication) runs an article asking for Republicans to split their vote by playing on the emotions of the reader to want to help the underdog/little guy win. By splitting the vote, Obama gets a second term.
Most people consider such a style to be Yellow Journalism. to Ho-Po