It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by ImaFungi
But the reason threads like these are rare on ats is because everyone who has just read this thread,, is already aware of this stuff,,,, and what have they done about it?
what will a thousands more people reading these quotes and becoming intellectually angry do about anything?
What can we do? Aside from grow our own, pull out of the banks and stock market, and refuse to participate...
I think people are just so overwhelmed they don't know where to start. It's too huge.
Originally posted by YoungSoul
22. “Make the 'Goyim' destroy each other so there will only be the proletariat left in the world, with a few millionaires devoted to our cause, and sufficient police and soldiers to protect our interest.”
Of course I've seen most of this stuff before, but this is the one that I cant quite rectify. If only proletariat existed, who would maintain the roads and make the fancy automobiles? Who would grow the food? Who would be responsible for manufacturing new products for the elite? Surely they don't want to use the same iPad for the rest of their lives. Who would maintain satellites for wireless technology?
Seems to me the global elite already has it pretty good right now. Why destroy the population of slaves that enables their lifestyle? Furthermore, are you still elite if no underlings exist anymore?
I'm not disagreeing with you, I actually want somebody who knows the answer to answer my questions.
Originally posted by Bisman
Despite everyone seeming to agree on the evilness of a new world order...
The devil's advocate in me kind of likes the idea.
It seems a perfect world will have to be united. or at least begin then.
united religion, economy, government. any one of these things would improve the situation as it is.
and nations (like the united states) will lose sovereignty. that seems like a bad idea right? Well dosnt sovereignty separate us? make us compete against other nations? compete for wealth and resources? meaning less for another nation?
Why does this logic "united we stand, divided we fall" only apply to united states citizens, when referencing the united states? when there is an entire world of other peoples.
OK granted, "The ends justify the means" is an evil outlook.
Granted, the Rothschild seeming to want to control all peoples for their own gain. thats evil.
but isnt this just shooting themselves in the foot? i would assume changing the world for better would be much easier with a united world. after the evil banks conquer all nations, only then are we 1 step closer to not even NEEDING money. fighting for changes to our 1 nation seems to have no effect on the bigger picture, even if our 1 nation revolutions are successful.
Or how about this conspiracy:
what if the Rothschilds and all banks are just tools for an even more controlling group? to unite the world. using the tool of money as thats what makes the world goes round, in the long run wont be needed at all.
so then all the evil bankers and politicians are really the ones being fooled arent they?
I realize the many things people are angry about, transition is hard. but there are so many bigger pictures it seems.
and i can hardly hate the means, just because in my lifetime, i wont get to experience the wonderful ends.
Dont get me wrong please. I am still on the fence about many things. still studying many conspiracies.
it just came to a conclusion, that perhaps, all the evils in the world are unaware that they are the tools of change. that what they do they wont truly benefit from, but instead all of humanity will reek eventual rewards for it.
Originally posted by Bisman
Despite everyone seeming to agree on the evilness of a new world order...
The devil's advocate in me kind of likes the idea.
It seems a perfect world will have to be united. or at least begin then.
united religion, economy, government. any one of these things would improve the situation as it is.
and nations (like the united states) will lose sovereignty. that seems like a bad idea right? Well dosnt sovereignty separate us? make us compete against other nations? compete for wealth and resources? meaning less for another nation?
Why does this logic "united we stand, divided we fall" only apply to united states citizens, when referencing the united states? when there is an entire world of other peoples.
OK granted, "The ends justify the means" is an evil outlook.
Granted, the Rothschild seeming to want to control all peoples for their own gain. thats evil.
but isnt this just shooting themselves in the foot? i would assume changing the world for better would be much easier with a united world. after the evil banks conquer all nations, only then are we 1 step closer to not even NEEDING money. fighting for changes to our 1 nation seems to have no effect on the bigger picture, even if our 1 nation revolutions are successful.
Or how about this conspiracy:
what if the Rothschilds and all banks are just tools for an even more controlling group? to unite the world. using the tool of money as thats what makes the world goes round, in the long run wont be needed at all.
so then all the evil bankers and politicians are really the ones being fooled arent they?
I realize the many things people are angry about, transition is hard. but there are so many bigger pictures it seems.
and i can hardly hate the means, just because in my lifetime, i wont get to experience the wonderful ends.
Dont get me wrong please. I am still on the fence about many things. still studying many conspiracies.
it just came to a conclusion, that perhaps, all the evils in the world are unaware that they are the tools of change. that what they do they wont truly benefit from, but instead all of humanity will reek eventual rewards for it.
Originally posted by Bisman
You can't assume our first government leadership will be perfect...
But its a million years closer to perfecting ourselves then the current system of seperated nations distracted with less important issues.
“Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money.” — Sir Josiah Stamp, Director of the Bank of England (appointed 1928). Reputed to be the 2nd wealthiest man in England at that time.
Originally posted by ErgoTheConclusion
reply to post by xavi1000
I was actually somewhat eager to accept that debunking, but upon another listen Kennedy is clearly speaking on multiple levels for those listening at the time to get his deeper message. It's one that he simply couldn't speak plainly about.