posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 03:00 PM
a reply to:
AceWombat04
You might be very right, my friend pointed it out also. There could be other 'elite' groups involved with a different view or goal then the once in
charge, nazi Germany for example. Hitler had enought attempts within to take over power. Most likely people who shared the same ideas at start but
went a different path or just did not agree with some changes along the way.
I believe it's different in our current situation. The thing is that these people tend to act a role on stage and talk different behind the stage.
Perfect example of this is the past elections. Friends before election, enemy during electing and back to shaking eachother hands after election...
why ? They could share the same goal or have the same investors. It's well known that major funds go both ways. Even during ww1 and ww2 we had groups
funding both party's. I bet the masters in charge won't allow funding's go both ways when there not sure if the other group does not share the same
interest.
Think about the Bohemian grove and other meetings of the global cabal. Enemy's on stage while meeting in private to spend a weekend together. These
people seemingly disagree with each other on a global view, but share the same goal without a doubt.
In either way, where in some deep mess all together !