It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
This event sadly is just the latest in a string of high-publicity bad moves by the NYPD, going back to the Occupy Wall Street protests, and including the blatantly illegal monitoring of citizens not even under their jurisdiction. These events together raise serious questions about the effectiveness, discipline and ethics of not just the police in New York but also the government there that is supposed to control them.
Originally posted by drivebricker
Unbelievable
New York (CNN) -- A disgruntled former apparel designer was killed Friday morning in a hail of police gunfire in front of the Empire State Building after he shot and killed a co-worker and engaged in a gunbattle with two officers, authorities said.
Police officers fired a total of 16 rounds; one officer shot nine while another one shot seven, the New York Police Department said.
Don't have much on this as of yet as the story is still breaking.
www.cnn.com
All 9 people injured in Friday's shooting near the Empire State Building were wounded by Policeedit on 25-8-2012 by drivebricker because: (no reason given)edit on 25-8-2012 by drivebricker because: (no reason given)
edit on 26/8/2012 by Sauron because: internal quote tags to external quote tags
Sure they panicked, squeezed the trigger and missed too many times.
But how do you know that they didn't assess the situation before engaging the target?
In a crowded place like the midtown in NYC if you have nutjob shooting people the more you wait the more people he could be shooting...
Originally posted by GoOfYFoOt
reply to post by maxella1
Sure they panicked, squeezed the trigger and missed too many times.
But how do you know that they didn't assess the situation before engaging the target?
In a crowded place like the midtown in NYC if you have nutjob shooting people the more you wait the more people he could be shooting...
Did you watch the video posted on page 1 of this thread, that showed the incident related to this discussion?
The first officer was caught off guard by the suspect, and was retreating while drawing and firing multiple rounds in the perp's general direction. I believe his ONLY thought was killing the guy with the gun.
The second cop, the one shown on the right side of the video, parried the suspect, effectively removing the sidewalk full of people out of the background. Whether this was intentional, or a reaction, I have no idea. During this, one of the officers, started firing rapidly, which put the other officer into condition black, and he too, began firing.
There was no time for assessment and planning.
It was, "GUN", shoot-shoot-shoot-shoot-shoot-shoot-shoot-shoot-shoot-shoot-shoot-shoot-shoot-shoot-shoot-shoot.
Except the shooting was over, before you finished reading that last sentence.
The Glock 17 has a very good reset, and is capable of putting alot of rounds downrange, in a hurry. The downside to the Glock, is it is light, which increases recoil, and it is not generally accurate, due to it's lock-up design. But at this short distance, it is quite capable of 6-8 inch groups in rapid fire.
Bottom line: They are cops. Not judges. Not juries. But this time, they were executioners.
edit on 8/26/2012 by GoOfYFoOt because: (no reason given)
To me that seemed pretty obvious from the start. Well the one guy who was murdered wasn't shot by the police. That was a separate exchange. I saw the video, and it looks like the gunman only had time to pull his gun, Never got off a shot, before the police unloaded. Sixteen rounds seems to be excessive.
Bottom line: They are cops. Not judges. Not juries. But this time, they were executioners.
Originally posted by sputniksteve
reply to post by GoOfYFoOt
Until you provide some credentials i assume you are IT guys and tellers, i mean this is the internet. I can' t take everyone that tells me they are spec ops for granted or i become the fool. I mean that respectively of course and i expect you will agree with my reservations.
I dont dismiss your criticism with out merit even. I acknowledge they made mistakes, i think that much is obvious. I still think it's comical for someone to project their abilities onto a stranger and make claims that they would have done it better. Regardless of qualifications. Knowing what we know about the state of law enforcement we shouldn't expect anything less. We should strive, hope, and demand better; but not expect it.
I think we're getting closer here guys
So what was it two policemen? Eight shots apiece? How many shots does that gun hold?
Next time you are walking down the street and there's a guy shooting people call a judge.
Glock 17's
It was either kill or be killed. Both cops were out in the open, no protection, and the guy pulled out a gun with all the bystanders around. Really not much you can do in that situation.
Originally posted by roadgravel
Glock 17's
Did the police state that or is there a clear video that someone positively identified the weapons. Just curious...
Originally posted by roadgravel
Probably a good assumption given how widely it is used.
Originally posted by GoOfYFoOt
reply to post by maxella1
Next time you are walking down the street and there's a guy shooting people call a judge.
He wasn't shooting!!!
The officers were going in with limited knowledge.
"man with gun" "may have just shot someone"
They fired the first through sixteenth shots. And were the only ones that fired.
Why do people argue points that are flawed, misrepresented, or even contrived, and then resort to animosity without reason or justification?
Not much! But there was more that could have been done, than what they did do.