It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by neo96
Originally posted by DerepentLEstranger
Originally posted by neo96
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by neo96
The problem isn't that he's pro-life. The problem is that he is saying if you got pregnant from a rape it means you actually wanted to be raped. It doesn't matter if you're pro-life or pro-choice that is just an extremely stupid and horrific statement to make.
Quote that from the article specifically please.
Direct quotation where he said if you got pregnant from a rape they wanted to be raped.
not from atkins perhaps,
but you yourself posted on the "if you were raped, god wanted it to happen" thread if memory serves
so just check your own posting history
searching rape with ats search
seems to show that the ole patriarchal "right to rape" is alive and kicking in some parts of the us
edit on 19-8-2012 by DerepentLEstranger because: (no reason given)
Link the post please:
“Let’s assume that maybe that didn’t work, or something,” Akin said. “I think there should be some punishment, but the punishment ought to be on the rapist and not attacking the child.”
The "right to rape" ??????
Originally posted by neformore
Originally posted by neo96
The guy is anti abortion who is trying to save the life of a child(many of them) that has no capacity to fight back which makes him stupid,extremist etc.
The man is an idiot who expects a woman to carry her rapists child. Do you have any idea of the concept of that from a woman's point of view?
Force into sex. Humiliated. Degraded. Violated.
And then some fool comes along and tells her she has to carry the child of the man who did that to her - a daily reminder of the event for 9 months of pregnancy, the whole birthing process and a lifetime reminder of the event afterwards.
That's not politics. That's not even religion. That's just pure evil sadism.
No one has the right to say that to a woman when it can be prevented. No one.
Its 2012 dammit, not the stone age.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by muse7
Fine let's talk about partisan hackery the same people that says "women should have a choice" then turn around and try to tell others what to do with their bodies such as:
No smoking
No transfats
No big gulps
No guns
etc,
No guns
Originally posted by neo96
www.physiciansforlife.org...
Take this for what it is worth.
Calling people stupid over it?
That is ones prerogative.
Originally posted by neformore
reply to post by seagull
Its not really a party politics thing... when it boils down to it the question is how can someone who comes out with something so crassly stupid actually be in a position where they can run for senate - and who the hell would vote for them?
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by muse7
Fine let's talk about partisan hackery the same people that says "women should have a choice" then turn around and try to tell others what to do with their bodies such as:
No smoking
No transfats
No big gulps
No guns
etc,
Originally posted by bjax9er
is this a scientific fact?
i don't know, i'am not a doctor.
but if you support the mass murder of children,
then don't vote for the guy.
it's really quite simple folks
either you support mass murder,
or you don't.
what's the genocide up to?
70,000,000 murdered.
but it's a choice right?