It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: kauskau
a reply to: hellobruce
nice...
the title already is enough to hypnotize you in thinking that he was debunked.
No he was not..As many people in this thread pointed out with their explanation about how telepathy works.
The main concept was: he is not real because he can only speak english..
That was all..the "debunking" was based on.
But believe what you will...
originally posted by: kauskau
a reply to: NavyDoc
Jim Jones ..is easily "debunkable" .
Bashar is not.
Thats why people can find many things that are wrong with jim jones concepts ..but not with bashars concepts.
There is not one Concept from bashar ..that was debunked
in 30 years...
Jim Jones couldnt do that.
As i said: listen to 2 hours bashar....listen to 2 hours jim jones... SEE the difference.
But do it....watch it for more than a few minutes.... You will know.
originally posted by: kauskau
a reply to: hellobruce
nice...
the title already is enough to hypnotize you in thinking that he was debunked.
No he was not..As many people in this thread pointed out with their explanation about how telepathy works.
The main concept was: he is not real because he can only speak english..
That was all..the "debunking" was based on.
But believe what you will...
originally posted by: NavyDoc
People can point out how they think "telepathy" works, but that is rally not evidence of anything.
originally posted by: FlySolo
Information he receives is from omnipotent beings
I've explained this 400 friggen times 400 different ways.
originally posted by: tanka418
originally posted by: FlySolo
Information he receives is from omnipotent beings
Just where in this vast Universe are you getting this "omnipotent" bull#.
I am neither a fan nor follower of Bashar, but, no where in anything I experienced has Bashar come off as being omnipotent.
He may talk in "lofty" terms, and act like he is...well perhaps an ET, but, nowhere have I seen "omnipotent". I feel this is just one of your misunderstandings of this whole set of event.
I've explained this 400 friggen times 400 different ways.
Just what have you explained 400 different ways? Your hypothesis on why Bashar requires a translator?
I and several others have explained this quite adequately...You refuse to listen and continue to insist that this all meet YOUR specifications, when of course, it won't, it can't... Your thoughts on telepathy are entirely incorrect. And, before you go into telling us why you know better, perhaps because you have done some research, please consider; You can't employ telepathy, some of us can. Who would you think would have the greater knowledge?
I and several others have explained this quite adequately...You refuse to listen and continue to insist that this all meet YOUR specifications
originally posted by: FlySolo
First, this isn't a thread titled "telepathy debunked" It's only about Anka.
Second, the omnipotent part is my bit. That's my sarcastic way of calling him a "know-it-all"
Third, since the conception of this thread I have struggled multiple times to say the same thing. I have used pretty much every word in my vocabulary and every analogy I can think of to explain why Anka is not channeling anyone.
No, you refuse to listen. Every time I say it, you or someone else comes along with something completely irrelevant and off topic. It's not my specifications. I'll say it again (401x now) Anka is getting information from beings who can see us without our knowledge. They admit to using our "coordinates" to pop in and out. So why can't they tell Anka something he can't possibly know? It's not just limited to language or a translator, in encompasses everything.
This is effing insane man. Making me say it again. Either admit you don't know what I'm asking, don't understand English, or refuse to acknowledge I have a valid question.
eta: It doesn't matter, telepathy, channeling, dreaming, watching tv or listening to the radio. It's the "source" of the information which is the crux of my argument. All those other things are just transmission mediums. You can explain how all of those things work as many times as you like but you're wasting my and your time. I don't care how a radio works when I'm interested in the SOURCE of the information, AKA Bashar. The man on the radio can tell me what's going on in the street and I can trust that information as being true. Exactly-the-same-thing as channeling "if it is indeed real".
Now, do you finally understand?
Do you understand that this wee bit virtually invalidates your whole line. I mean really, sir. You misrepresent the whole thing through your sarcasm, and expect something reasonable in return?!?
I'm sorry, but it appears to me as though YOU are the one who refuses to listen. What I see, as an experienced telepath, is you refusing to accept the idea and reality of telepathy on its terms, you seem to want to make it into something that YOU have specified, as opposed to nature.
.although my refusal to acknowledge your question as valid is based in reality, not a fantasy.
Telepathy is a strange thing to be sure, but, it has it's very own set of rules, properties, events, methods just like anything else that is real. It is high time that you stop your rhetoric, learn the reality of the situation, and went forward with more / better knowledge.
I've seen your question, and even responded to it a few times, this time it seems a wee bit expanded.
As for the source: Bashar is completely consistent with telepathy...100% Even IF Daryl is perhaps a wee bit too much of a showman.
And, that, I feel, is the crux of your issue...the real crux; Daryl is too much of a showman, and has the temerity to actually have some "fun" with it.