Irish heroine of Batman shooting spree drowns

Originally posted by IamMe14

Originally posted by Unmask The Deception

Originally posted by dogstar23
reply to post by exdog5

 

If this is the only one, then as another stated regarding a "Final Destination" scenario - maybe there is some level of synchronicity involved (to what ends, I don't know, as I know nothing of how reality actually works) - but I'll put this out there: about 1 in 110,000 people drown in the U.S. Every year. If there were 500 people in the theatre, then the odds were about 1:220 that someone in that theatre would drown within 12 months of the shooting.

These odds are incorrect. You only got these odd by dividing 110,000 by 500 which then equals 220. You then need to multiply that by 110,000.

The true odds here that someone would drown in that supposed group of 500 is actually 1:24,200,000

Now with those odds, there is reason for suspicion.

Hold on a minute, there is some definite confusion going on here. The way I read the story is that she worked in the hospital where victims of the massacre were treated, so she helped save the lives of those who were in the theater that night. She however, was NOT in the theater herself. She isn't a witness to the shooting.

Am I understanding this incorrectly?

I personally believe something doesn't add up with the shooting itself. However, I really don't see a reason why a medical professional would be "silenced". It just doesn't make sense to me at all. I'm not saying for sure that no foul play occurred, just that if a witness had knowledge of something it would most likely be someone who was actually IN the theater that night.

I think the whole suspicion links to the fact she treated several witnesses at the hospital and possibly these witnesses told her things that go against the official story. It's pure speculation but the fact that we have a death that's connected to the Batman shootings and it's a weird one, at that, has us all questioning why it happened.

While my opinion on this is not firm - yet - Im starting to lean more towards the husband disposed of her than the government.

The details (what we know) are hinky and conflicting. The lack of details and the lack of attention too.

But I have yet to see any reason the government would take her out. If anything they would start taking out the victims who would have spoken to her. Why keep the actual witnesses alive??? The government theory makes no logical sense when all the victims she came into contact with are still alive.

And she was not the only nurse who worked with the victims. No patient has just one nurse working with them. There is a team...along with doctors. So why are they all still alive and well? And what is the chance that victims were ever alone with just her? Slim. The hospital was VERY VERY busy.

Just like there is not enough info regarding her disappearance then death....there is not enough info as to why the government would specifically target her.

Originally posted by greeneyedleo
While my opinion on this is not firm - yet - Im starting to lean more towards the husband disposed of her than the government.

The details (what we know) are hinky and conflicting. The lack of details and the lack of attention too.

But I have yet to see any reason the government would take her out. If anything they would start taking out the victims who would have spoken to her. Why keep the actual witnesses alive??? The government theory makes no logical sense when all the victims she came into contact with are still alive.

And she was not the only nurse who worked with the victims. No patient has just one nurse working with them. There is a team...along with doctors. So why are they all still alive and well? And what is the chance that victims were ever alone with just her? Slim. The hospital was VERY VERY busy.

Just like there is not enough info regarding her disappearance then death....there is not enough info as to why the government would specifically target her.

edit on August 18th 2012 by greeneyedleo because: (no reason given)

Good point. If we start to see witness death, then, well...

What exactly is the conspiracy here? What is being covered up? NWO population control or what?

Originally posted by HomerinNC
Late at night, swimming in a lake, might she have gotten disoriented, got tired and couldn't tread water anymore?
Until we see the results of the autopsy or hear from the friend, I think this was a horrible accident

I dunno, buddy. First thing I was taught in swimming class was not treading water, it was floating. Yes, anyone with an average or more amount of body fat can float!

reply to post by mikemck1976


Well, she survived for a few weeks after the shooting. I'm getting flash backs of Final Destination.

reply to post by greeneyedleo


In the end I can't speculate as to motives.. To me one is as good as the other (or bad, sorry).

What I can say though is that there was definitely foul play, a contrived theater (no pun intended) with a dead body at the center.

I think the husband was involved but not the person who had the 'idea', if you get my meaning.

Alright.... Now there are two sides to this story, so I will share both.

While the article was very vague, it left with a lot of questions. If it was an ongoing investigation, they wouldn't release more information, but the obvious statement in the article was that [they may never know what happened to Jenny]. Which in itself is very bizarre statement, in my opinion. If she went swimming with her friend, then how can her friend not know exactly what happened?

I will tell you from my experience... This is suspicious and most likely a murder that looked like accidental drowning. My own view about Aurora shooting was that it was staged -- but I am not going to discuss that here.

This woman had contact with the "victims" of Aurora shooting and may have some critical information about the whole thing going on. Yes, she may have tried to speak out, which we may never know, or she may have even threaten to tell someone. If she wanted to tell someone the truth, she can act as an imposter and try to leak information.

I couldn't find anything about what some of you have said that the husband's statement was bizarre? What statement was that?

So if it was not a murder... Then is it possible she may have drown? Yes, due to health reason - such as breathing or water-filled lung or she have had a heart attack. Although, it seems like she must be in good health, but that may not always be the case. If she was a good swimmer, I doubt she would have trouble trying to swim to the top...

So.. my theory is that someone strangled her when the friend was not looking. Or if the friend is involved, then...

History repeats itself.. when someone threaten to tell the truth or leak information, they get killed.

After all, we may never know the truth. So instead of playing detective here, be careful and pay attention to what is going on around you and protect yourself.

Double post - Sorry!

reply to post by texasgirl


If more people began to question this death, they will not release information about the others. Besides, we only saw a handful of "witnesses" but evidently, there were MORE than just those that was overexposed in the media. We just may never know about the others.

reply to post by spiderLL


Just wondering what your opinion is on her death, cited as occurring on the 7th of August while the first report of her death was ten days later, on the 17th?

Or rather, on the delayed reporting of her death.

We will never ever ever ever know the 100% fact on what happened to her unfortunately,My OPINION is there was foul play - by TPTB or the husband,Who knows

I don't think the death is related directly to the shooting. Of course it's still a sad story though.

Originally posted by spiderLL

I couldn't find anything about what some of you have said that the husband's statement was bizarre? What statement was that?

So if it was not a murder... Then is it possible she may have drown? Yes, due to health reason - such as breathing or water-filled lung or she have had a heart attack. Although, it seems like she must be in good health, but that may not always be the case. If she was a good swimmer, I doubt she would have trouble trying to swim to the top...

So.. my theory is that someone strangled her when the friend was not looking. Or if the friend is involved, then...

History repeats itself.. when someone threaten to tell the truth or leak information, they get killed.

After all, we may never know the truth. So instead of playing detective here, be careful and pay attention to what is going on around you and protect yourself.

A report quoted the husband as saying "she was not a good swimmer".....yet she went surfing in Costa Rica.

I am a surfer. Surfing in an ocean is a zillion times harder than swimming in a lake. You take your board out, fall off and get caught up in an undercurrent....you better know how to swim and what direction or you will drown! I cant imagine a person who is not a good swimmer getting out on a board in the ocean and being ok. That is just bizarre!

On top of that, why would a person who is not a good swimmer, go out on a lake in a boat w/ no vest at night?

Things that make you go......hmmmmmmmmmmmm

Originally posted by djr33222
reply to post by greeneyedleo

 

What I can say though is that there was definitely foul play, a contrived theater (no pun intended) with a dead body at the center.
.

edit on 18-8-2012 by djr33222 because: (no reason given)

You can not say this. You do realise that she could have just accidently drowned.

It is a possibilty right. Just the same as foul play.

You youngans, take a step back abd things become clearer.

reply to post by greeneyedleo


I agree with you. There are two possibilities: the husband did not actually say that or the media added it in (or provided a false statement, similar to that of the news report that claimed Holmes' mother stated "you got the right person.")

reply to post by djr33222


Someone had to report it if there were news circulating around regarding her death. So the news media had to wait till some time later after the Aurora incident to not appear suspicious.

I am going to be vague but hope you get the idea: I worked in law enforcement. There was a homicide that was reported as an accident. It was never reported in the media, but when friends and family started questioning, the news reported it weeks later. The death was definitely related to a political situation in Sacramento. After awhile, people were trying to piece things together, but the news did so well to convey that it was more of a coincidence and accident than foul play. So unfortunately, these circumstances can happen.

reply to post by mikemck1976

She escaped death once...A 'Final Destination' from what we concluded.
a-m-f-t-m-w-s-d
copy written aug 18th 3012.

Originally posted by LastProphet527
reply to post by mikemck1976

 

She escaped death once...A 'Final Destination' from what we concluded.
a-m-f-t-m-w-s-d-s-d
copy written aug 18th 3012.

I hate to give one line responses,but.........

What??

Originally posted by mikemck1976

Originally posted by LastProphet527
reply to post by mikemck1976

 

She escaped death once...A 'Final Destination' from what we concluded.
a-m-f-t-m-w-s-d-s-d
copy written aug 18th 3012.

I hate to give one line responses,but.........

What??

She was suppose to die that day in the movies,but she escaped death. a-m-f-t-m-w-s-d-