3 Earthquakes in Southern Cali in the past 14 hours

reply to post by TMG333


thank you
hope that is a good sign.

Originally posted by ujustneverknow
Here's what I noticed while keeping my eyes riveted on the USGS Real-time EQ map for nearly 24 hours...
Cali is having a steady run of 3's and 4's.
Alaska seems to be following suit...but a bit stronger and moving inland.
The plates between south America and Africa are having some "surprise" appearances.
All of these 5.5 and below....
As someone who watches daily , it seems to be an uptick in activity. Appearing to be nothing special but ya never know.
The only thing making me over-excited is all the activity in Alaska and the dotting of where the plates meet around Africa and South America , they seem "out of place" if you go by day to day rumblings.
It's definitely been an interesting 24 hours.

edit on 9-8-2012 by ujustneverknow because: Cali seems to be quieting down , the last EQ this afternoon a 4.4 in Ferndale.

I love that site. Yesterday was impressive also. It was constant. Alaska is intersesting to me too.

Originally posted by ryan2s
reply to post by autopat51

 

random 2.0 or less up and down the coast
Friday August 10 2012, 02:52:01 UTC 6 minutes ago Central Alaska 2.3
Friday August 10 2012, 02:51:59 UTC 6 minutes ago Southern California 1.0
Friday August 10 2012, 02:29:43 UTC 28 minutes ago Nevada 2.4
Friday August 10 2012, 02:26:31 UTC 31 minutes ago Southern Alaska 2.3
Friday August 10 2012, 02:19:22 UTC 38 minutes ago Halmahera, Indonesia 5.0
Friday August 10 2012, 02:19:20 UTC 38 minutes ago Molucca Sea 5.0
Friday August 10 2012, 02:09:50 UTC 48 minutes ago Central California 2.0
Friday August 10 2012, 02:08:55 UTC 49 minutes ago Eastern Turkey 2.6
Friday August 10 2012, 01:50:52 UTC 67 minutes ago Northern California 2.0
Friday August 10 2012, 01:50:33 UTC 67 minutes ago Central California 2.0
Friday August 10 2012, 01:42:01 UTC 76 minutes ago San Diego County urban area, California 1.8


taken from quakes.globalincidentmap.com...

I am confused? Isn't it Thursday still. Or is this a prediction about tomorrow? Or is today Friday? Or maybe I am just easily confused...

reply to post by crazyguy2012


thats funny
i was thinking the same thing!!

Originally posted by riverwild
reply to post by RELDDIR

 

I'm a bit confused. I'm new to ATS and not sure what you mean by that.

I didnt lie about anything,

Don't worry. I am always confused. You just need to keep your mind open and ask and someone here will point you in the right direction... It is also good to know someone else out there is just as confused as I am...

reply to post by crazyguy2012


hmm ive never noticed the date... it must use a different time zone for its time
these are current or past quakes
quakes.globalincidentmap.com...

sorry for the confusion

reply to post by ujustneverknow


My sentiments exactly.
The 4.7 in the Mozambique Channel 2 hours ago seemed a bit rare as well. If not rare, then well-timed with the rest of the symphony.

Originally posted by crazyguy2012

Originally posted by riverwild
reply to post by RELDDIR

 

Don't worry. I am always confused. You just need to keep your mind open and ask and someone here will point you in the right direction... It is also good to know someone else out there is just as confused as I am...

edit on 9-8-2012 by crazyguy2012 because: (no reason given)

Thank you! I appreciate that.

I think because I'm new here, some may think I may be one of those FOS peeps.

yes! If you look at the entire map there are several incidents that are just wth? lol

Then you have the NZ volcanoes rumbling too...

I think I just get nervous because sometimes I feel like we as humans are doomed anyway , all the bad in the world , I worry the wrath of god is coming,lol.
I don't like doom porn but some of this stuff is interesting and I get caught up in the possibilities....that's when I smack myself and remember that those very possibilities could mean total devastation.....scary stuff

Odd they use stars...I don't recall seeing this before, anyone?

reply to post by Staroth


i dont understand..
what does your pic shows us?

Odd they use stars...I don't recall seeing this before, anyone?

Yesterday there were no stars. In fact, it read 7.2 magnitude with no warnings. Today, there is a warning and a 8.7 magnitude. I don't know what to make of this. I'm curious to see what it will look like tomorrow.

reply to post by Staroth


Stars mean 'Warning' indicating extremely high levels..
Still don't know of the validity of the site, I'm wondering if it's being manipulated to bolster some of the claims being made here of whether it's actual data.

reply to post by sageturkey


high levels of what?
sorry never seen this before

Originally posted by crazyguy2012

Originally posted by ryan2s
reply to post by autopat51

 

random 2.0 or less up and down the coast
Friday August 10 2012, 02:52:01 UTC 6 minutes ago Central Alaska 2.3
Friday August 10 2012, 02:51:59 UTC 6 minutes ago Southern California 1.0
Friday August 10 2012, 02:29:43 UTC 28 minutes ago Nevada 2.4
Friday August 10 2012, 02:26:31 UTC 31 minutes ago Southern Alaska 2.3
Friday August 10 2012, 02:19:22 UTC 38 minutes ago Halmahera, Indonesia 5.0
Friday August 10 2012, 02:19:20 UTC 38 minutes ago Molucca Sea 5.0
Friday August 10 2012, 02:09:50 UTC 48 minutes ago Central California 2.0
Friday August 10 2012, 02:08:55 UTC 49 minutes ago Eastern Turkey 2.6
Friday August 10 2012, 01:50:52 UTC 67 minutes ago Northern California 2.0
Friday August 10 2012, 01:50:33 UTC 67 minutes ago Central California 2.0
Friday August 10 2012, 01:42:01 UTC 76 minutes ago San Diego County urban area, California 1.8


taken from quakes.globalincidentmap.com...

I am confused? Isn't it Thursday still. Or is this a prediction about tomorrow? Or is today Friday? Or maybe I am just easily confused...

UTC is universal time...

reply to post by crazyguy2012

those times are UTC which is 8 hours ahead of PST. since quakes occur everywhere in the world, the site uses "coordinated universal time" but will also show the time since the last quake.
Live Earthquake Map

reply to post by autopat51


High levels of H.A.A.R.P. activity or high-frequency waves.
For a primer on H.A.A.R.P. - I'd check out the WIKI for the base factual info Here, or browse through some of the threads for some of the more controversial ideas about it such as This One.

reply to post by Staroth


from your link it states:

August 9, 2012 At 8:50am Pacific Daylight Time, A week long duration wave was building over the Western United States and since has come to a peak. A double-reading was shown on preliminary results, embedded within the single longwave. Further analysis has shown this to not be a computer error. Two M8s have peaked in California. These longwaves have been known to produce violent weather or Earthquakes nearby. Areas around Mexico, California, Oregon, Washington, Canada, and Alaska should be on the look out for increased seismic activity.

It then goes on to say this:

Wavelengths - Shortwaves indicate near events, a high short spike usually means a short term major event is about to happen in that area. Longwaves and steady increases usually mean a large scale change is developing in the area that will effect a large area's upper level jet stream.

M1 - M2 - Slight change is expected, but overall the weather pattern is not being affected.

M3 - M5 - Change is expected and the reading indicates between then and and a few days it will happen. This is considered a moderate reading, which if a short spike can be a nearby event such as severe weather, unexpected lightning, or a tornado.

M6 - M9 - Significant change is expected. Anything over M7 is rare and special attention must be directed when readings go seven and higher. Severe storms are associated with this reading, which if a short spike can be a nearby event and a long duration and slow build being a large scale change.

M10 - Associated with tornado outbreaks. This also can be strong hurricanes and blizzards.

So since they are talking about anM8 event does that mean since it has peaked that the risk is over or that it is still a possible negative outcome?

Thanks for the link.

Anyone know about DARPA involvement with EQ?? I read it somewhere.

It's a little odd that the coast of north America is having mini eq.

The 104 hour warning was already posted, so as haarpa indicates, the warning is imminent. I'm guessing that its getting close to possibly a big eq. Our local news stated that the small multiple eq can lead to a big one..who knows.but it is possible.