It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Dont get me wrong, I too believe abortion is wrong. However, when we have a choice (most do) we try to do what causes the least amount of suffering. An unwanted child may suffer all its life, so too might the mother. So whats best?
Originally posted by ofhumandescent
reply to post by VoidHawk
I use to be pro-choice.
Like you I am very close to 60 and I agree its getting "strange", but I'm a non believer, and though I know about Bohemia grove I do not believe in their god either.
Originally posted by ofhumandescent
I've been around almost 60 years and things are getting really strange.................not just progressively strange but really super strange.
Most of that stuff has always been happening, it's just more widely reported these days.
Originally posted by ofhumandescent
James Holmes, the face eaters in FL, endless wars, rumors of wars, earthquakes, floods, petulance, this is just the beginning......................come back in another five years and tell us if you think this guy is so whacked out.
As I said, I'm not a believer, however, if I was I'd agree that dogs would go to heaven, I like dogs more than I like most people
Originally posted by ofhumandescent
All babies and dogs go to heaven (my own opinion).
Originally posted by MeesterB
Thanks for posting this.
You can debate all day about the validity of his story, but you can't deny the message. I bet God is sad when unborn children are destroyed.
Originally posted by RealSpoke
reply to post by ofhumandescent
Moloch isn't an owl, it is a cow. Whatever they are dancing around at the Bohemian Grove is not Moloch.
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by RealSpoke
reply to post by ofhumandescent
Moloch isn't an owl, it is a cow. Whatever they are dancing around at the Bohemian Grove is not Moloch.
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by MeesterB
I bet God is sad when unborn children are destroyed.
Why would he be upset? How are the children destroyed?
I thought heaven was the ultimate goal, those children got a free-pass. If heaven is so great I don't think they would be too worried about not having lives on Earth?
Originally posted by RealSpoke
reply to post by deadeyedick
I guess you don't realize that a lot of people don't see a 3 week old fetus as aliveedit on 1-8-2012 by RealSpoke because: (no reason given)
Because abortion ends the life, love and promise of a human being. There isn't a "race to heaven", as you seem to imply. We are here for a reason. Killing a baby negates that purpose. How dare you say that they don't deserve a life on this Earth?
Originally posted by coyotepoet
reply to post by adjensen
Because abortion ends the life, love and promise of a human being. There isn't a "race to heaven", as you seem to imply. We are here for a reason. Killing a baby negates that purpose. How dare you say that they don't deserve a life on this Earth?
But it does not kill the soul, which will come back as another human being.
Also funny about the whole abortion thing, I bet a good chunk of "pro-lifers" also support the death penalty, thus not pro-life, at the most just anti-abortion
So your defense against abortion is a belief in reincarnation? Seriously? We know that abortion kills a child. Reincarnation is, at best, a claim without basis. How do you justify a cold reality with a claim that is speculation?
Probably the best known, if not most respected, collection of scientific data that appears to provide scientific proof that reincarnation is real, is the life's work of Dr. Ian Stevenson. Instead of relying on hypnosis to verify that an individual has had a previous life, he instead chose to collect thousands of cases of children who spontaneously (without hypnosis) remember a past life. Dr. Ian Stevenson uses this approach because spontaneous past life memories in a child can be investigated using strict scientific protocols. Hypnosis, while useful in researching into past lives, is less reliable from a purely scientific perspective. In order to collect his data, Dr. Stevenson methodically documents the child's statements of a previous life. Then he identifies the deceased person the child remembers being, and verifies the facts of the deceased person's life that match the child's memory. He even matches birthmarks and birth defects to wounds and scars on the deceased, verified by medical records. His strict methods systematically rule out all possible "normal" explanations for the child’s memories.
Dr. Stevenson's credentials are impeccable. He is a medical doctor and had many scholarly papers to his credit before he began paranormal research. He is the former head of the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Virginia, and now is Director of the Division of Personality Studies at the University of Virginia.