Holmes had TWO roommates! EVIDENCE that MSM is rewriting the official story before our eyes!!!

reply to post by eNaR


well, those roommates you're quoting are in Cali, so... I doubt CO public records would list them...

Originally posted by NOMOREMOLOCH2012
reply to post by new_here

 

sorry i did read what you said sir, keep asking those questions. But let's make sure people that if your going to quote somebody make sure they said it or they will use one mistake to make it look like your crazy.

Umm... I'm not a 'sir' first of all.
Also, I just clicked the "quote" option on the post back there and this site did the rest. If you look closely, your name is only listed as a 'replied to' by the other person's name (even though your name shows up bigger.) My reply and the quote was actually tied to the other person. I've been confused by that before, myself, so I totally understand.

But I gotta ask, what do you mean by:

…"if your going to quote somebody make sure they said it or they will use one mistake to make it look like your crazy."

Anyway, thanks, I'll keep asking those questions!

P.S... Respectful Heads-up: Your quote above needs you're instead of your. When you use you're it means "you are" (which is what you were going for) and your denotes ownership. Sorry to wax 'school teacher' on you, but I am one, LoL...

Originally posted by bluemirage5
We don't know if this has to do with the LIBOR connection, for all we know Robert Holmes was involved with alot more than meets the eye.

May I also say none of us are in the shoes of this father and none of us can even fathom what he is going through yet it's possible this is all to target Robert Holmes. We don't know.

For all we know this might be a human sacrifice for the Olympic Games so whats the bet nothing will happen in London!

None of us are going to get answers, it's going to be a open and shut case just like the masses of stupid people want. Perhaps the joke is on us?

Just to let you kiddies know, San Diego means Saint James, and James the Disciple of Jesus was beheaded so I have no elusions James Holmes is going to meet his fateful end. And I'm not even Christian.

Now who is this Jessica Redfield and Jessica Ghawi? Are they the same girl? I was on Jessica Redfield's twitter last night and there is a definate mention of her seeing a man dressed up as Batman outside the Eaton centre in Toronto on June 2nd. I understand she was found in the Colorado theatre with 2 bullet wounds to her head. That sounds to me she was a specific target. Another strange thing I found is the Eaton shopping centre runs parallel to a street named James Street.

I'm surprised no one has picked up on this yet because they're so busy diagnosing Holmes and dissecting his father's possible connection.

A human sacrifice for the Olympic games? Huh? The only reason they still do these things is because enough people have such nationalistic pride that they will cheer their TV set to watch people try to "out dive" each other. Me I could care less.

Question though - for those that feel this is part of some grand scheme, is every killer part of the same? If I guy murders his wife is he under mind control? What if he takes his wife and his neighbors out? Remember the term "going postal"? Were those people simply not distraught and decided to take it out on as many co-workers as possible? All these theories and no one motive. REAL motive (not some ancient blood spilling - I'm not into Game of Thrones). It's not gun control. That was squashed within 24 hours when the president and the GOP hopeful both said nope - not touching people's right to have these types of guns.

This thread has like 30 some pages and the topic started as Holmes had two roommates. Maybe he did at one time, but not recently. (could it be that someone that was once associated with him and didn't want the media attention had a page deleted? There are companies out there that will do that for you now. Seems more likely than google being in on the shooting as well). He lived in a very small, sparse 1 br apartment. Zero proof otherwise. Don't think Brian Williams wouldn't want to scoop that little story and gain a major ratings boost? Sure MSM influences, doubt they are so nefarious. They are all in the reality TV business now. Fox news at night isn't news, it's propaganda. Same with MSNBC. .

reply to post by jude11


Yeah I think it's a case of the bait and switch. He's like a new Oklahoma guy, o

reply to post by superhandsmantra


This act had all the basic hallmarks of a ritual event. Human sacrifice is probably not the purpose. The intent appears to be to perpetuate the agenda of reinforcing weakness and vice over strength and virtue. In order for the citizens of the most successful experiment with republican government to be reduced to a state of servitude and eventual enslavement, they must first be conditioned to fear virtually everything. Only then can they be ruled effectively. Without periodic recourse to these measures, the Occult Elite will be unable to create a state of complete submission. Instead, their machinations would eventually be faced by an intelligent, well-read, determined, tough and well-armed multitude of men intent upon the eradication of tyranny. No amount of money can save the Occult Elite should people of strong character catch on to what is happening. The very soldiers they hire out of the elite units of many countries (the U.S. obviously among them) would turn on them within minutes if their spell were to be broken.

The essence of that spell is fear. The ritual linkage between this event and the Columbine event is clear. This is a mystic ritual designed to control the collective unconscious.

We are beginning to run out of time.

reply to post by flashtrum


I can't explain all the coincidences I found other than someone/s knew the Craft and they knew it well. I'm not in to all that occult stuff those Freemasons are, too much over my head but I do have some knowledge of it and it's been going on for thousands of years. Human and animal sacrifices still continues I'm afraid to say and alot of people can not wrap their heads around it because it's so damn evil.

While it isn't necessarily the same scenario. I found this article that says the White House controls what many media outlets post. I think this is more well known than what we witnessed in the OP of this thread, but it still sheds some light on the journalism practices here in the US.

Check it out HERE

it looks like it was staged...or somekind of false flag operation

reply to post by ZiggyMojo


Well I don't know much about the technicalities of how searches on the internet work, but something happened last week, the day the "notebook" story came out (I think it was Thursday?), when I was searching on Google for "James Holmes." Initially, I had searched during my lunch break which was between 12:00-1:00. I searched his name, and a list of current stories came up...all on the notebook. The first story I read (and I can't remember which site I clicked on), the "source" mentioned stick figure "assailantS." And the reason I remember this is because I noticed the -s at the end of the word, and obviously thought more than one assailant.

When I got home from work, I searched "James Holmes" again, and none of the stories that I had seen during my lunch hour showed up. Is that normal? Because in my experience, it's not. It was like they had all disappeared, and the stories that showed up in the search had nothing to do with the notebook. It was like Google had erased all traces of the stories, at least when searching using just his name. I then decided to search "James Holmes notebook" to see if anything came up, and sure enough, the stories I had read earlier in the day were there (3-4 hour old stories). There were no new stories though, which again, I thought strange - usually the MSM pounces on stuff like that.

I tried once again to search just his name at around 8:00ish, and newer stories showed up in the search.
Anyway, it probably means absolutely nothing, but it just seemed that for a few hours the entire story disappeared...unless you knew it was there and to look for it.

reply to post by CinnamonHearts


There is nothing at all abnormal about this.

You saw it at the beginning of news cycle, by the time you checked again the popular articles about the notebook had become the most relavent results. That happens with popular stories all the time.

As for "assailantS".

Multiple pictures of an assailants = more than one assailant. Writing means endlessly monitoring your word count, even if it sometimes makes things read awkward.

And on top of that, if he's drawn a picture with 100 gunmen, would it MEAN anything? Should we therefore be looking for 99 more shooters?

Originally posted by Stormdancer777
Well after the Pennsylvania State University debacle, it wouldn't surprise me if the officials at the university are worried about something.

You better believe they are, and the MD Psychiatrist is busy cleaning up and preparing for an onslaught of media and legal inquiries. What astounds me is what came "out" after the Cho VA Tech Shooting. But since Holmes is alive, maybe this time we will get the opportunity to find out his motives.

"I suspect we will never really know Cho's motive, and the families know all too well what Cho did. We live [with] it every day. But there are many unanswered questions . . . who said what, who knew what, when" she said. (Lori Haas)


www.washingtontimes.com...

collegiatetimes.com... (Court orders answers)

There is so much dirt that can be found to describe his living conditions before he went off the deep end. Here is what I imagine his life is like:

He's squeaking by rent as a college student and falling apart because his habits are getting in the way of his studies and the psych patrol is undermining his confidence. He is going to have roommates who are broke and need a place to sleep, or avoiding parents, or the law. He may have friends chipping in on expenses.

From what I have read, his apartment was full of jars and booby traps as though it were a meth lab. Those skills are taught from somewhere. Usually there is someone running state to state teaching this stuff, someone in deep trouble with the law. These attitudes that get into peoples' minds that it's acceptable to buy weapons and hurt others, those are learned too.

But here is the thing that most theorists go too far on: that he's drugged by the government. I think he was on drugs before the trouble, and now in jail he's going through withdrawal symptoms. He is going to be going through withdrawal for a month or more, depending on the drugs he was using before.

Things are being censored because there is a gag order on the case.

Regardless of whether or not there were 2 shooters, there appears to be 2 James Holmes. This is most likely why no cameras are allowed. Did the dude have major plastic surgery or...

Originally posted by coyotepoet
Regardless of whether or not there were 2 shooters, there appears to be 2 James Holmes. This is most likely why no cameras are allowed. Did the dude have major plastic surgery or...

That's been debunked... and those sorts of imperfect side by side photo comparisons are very sketchy at the best of times...

reply to post by longlostbrother

That's been debunked... and those sorts of imperfect side by side photo comparisons are very sketchy at the best of times...

Care to point me towards the info that has debunked it? I haven't seen any of that yet.

but here are a few more photos



Look at the eyes.-granted the bottom picture isn't that great, but it even looks like different eye colors.

Originally posted by coyotepoet
reply to post by longlostbrother

 

That's been debunked... and those sorts of imperfect side by side photo comparisons are very sketchy at the best of times...

Care to point me towards the info that has debunked it? I haven't seen any of that yet.

but here are a few more photos

Look at the eyes.-granted the bottom picture isn't that great, but it even looks like different eye colors.

edit on 5-8-2012 by coyotepoet because: pics

I'll try and find the link, but someone did a much better and professional job of comparing the photos and it was clear that they were the same person.

As for eye colour, based on two random photos, give me a break.... unless you have very similar lighting, etc., trying to determine if people's eye colour is the same from two random photos is absurd.

It's fairly obvious to everyone but extreme CTers that it's the same guy, his parents say it's him, the police say it's him, the court said it was him...

Two very different photos (one of which is obviously stretched, and which are taken from different angles, with a different expression, and different hair colour) is not good enough to start leaping to these sorts of conclusions...

the other one, which debunked it, had them over-layed and faded between the two and there was at least an attempt to account for the perspective...

I'll try and find that link..

I just don't understand what the point of a cover up would be. So what if he had roomates? What would be the point in hiding that? Also, what you're showing us doesn't mean or prove anything. Anyone can own website and say whatever they want on it. There is nothing more to this story no matter how bad you want there to be. Holmes is a schizophrenic, he killed people. Period. Critically think, please.

reply to post by kisharninmah


The room mates may have been involved. They may have been handlers who got Holmes to do what he did, they may just be ordinary people who happen to know certain things about Holmes that maybe someone doesn't want to be public knowledge. Covering up the existence of roommates would make sense if you didn't want the media to find them and question them.

Critical thinking involves looking at all angles of a story, even if you end up abandoning the more far fetched theories eventually. No-body has diagnosed Holmes yet so you can't say you know he's schizophrenic, it might take months to diagnose what he has or hasn't got.

Originally posted by DrHammondStoat
reply to post by kisharninmah

 

The room mates may have been involved. They may have been handlers who got Holmes to do what he did, they may just be ordinary people who happen to know certain things about Holmes that maybe someone doesn't want to be public knowledge. Covering up the existence of roommates would make sense if you didn't want the media to find them and question them.

Critical thinking involves looking at all angles of a story, even if you end up abandoning the more far fetched theories eventually. No-body has diagnosed Holmes yet so you can't say you know he's schizophrenic, it might take months to diagnose what he has or hasn't got.

Why would investigators want to hide it from the public? If he had roommates they would be in custody to be questioned by the police. The media couldn't question them there. If not, police would need the media to put the images of these roommates out so that viewers can help find them. The media is speculating as to why and who might be involved regardless. There are gag orders and such until the trial is completed. However, this is not critical thinking it is conspiracy hunting. It takes about a few seconds of thought to see that this reasoning makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. The OP implies that law enforcement would want to hide the real criminals behind this shooting. Why? Law enforcement - they're just people like you and me. With families, wives, husbands, children -- this is not some government conspiracy.

Originally posted by DrHammondStoat
reply to post by kisharninmah

 

The room mates may have been involved. They may have been handlers who got Holmes to do what he did, they may just be ordinary people who happen to know certain things about Holmes that maybe someone doesn't want to be public knowledge. Covering up the existence of roommates would make sense if you didn't want the media to find them and question them.

Critical thinking involves looking at all angles of a story, even if you end up abandoning the more far fetched theories eventually.

You can't back up a single stitch of this with evidence though, can you?

Critical thinking doesn't involve making up wild theories and then pursing them past a point of reason.

The ONLY evidence of his room mates was a single report (all the others stem from the NBC report) that got the info from "public records". No eye witnesses said he had a room mate, much less two, in fact all of them called him a loner, and his neighbour basically said that he was the only person Holmes hung out with... "not me and his room mates"

Generating distracting nonsense isn't clever at all.