It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by theabsolutetruth
reply to post by heycitizen
Nobody seems to be saying they were suffering the effects of tear gas, just it got smoky!
The police audio has one of the officers saying that they thought it was CO gas
Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by happyhomemaker29
It would make it harder for the case because we would all dessect it and study the frames.
Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by happyhomemaker29
Id say thats a correct assumption going by another poster who says tear gas is more horrid and you need to remove clothing and shower down quickly.
Originally posted by happyhomemaker29
That's what I keep saying but everyone wants all the surveillance released which will be detrimental to prosecuting him. If he is a patsy, it will detrimental to finding the real person. Either way, it's harmful. Release the surveillance footage AFTER the case is over. But everyone wants answers now, which is understandable. Unfortunately, MSM, and us bystanders are going to have to wait for our answers.
Originally posted by Manhater
Here's another thing that I find far fetched from the reports. If this guy even took whatever 100 MGs of Vicodin or hydrocodone. The amount is an exaggeration. He would not shoot up a place. He would be sleeping it off, like he looked in court.
Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by skitzspiricy
How about this senario......
Holmes was offered a part in a short movie or documentary, he was told everyone in the theatre were actors and actresses and that his firearms had only blanks? After realising he was conned and the bullets were real, he told Police he was a Batman character in a short flick to do with some kind of psychology experiment, he spat at prison guards etc knowing he was toast and did'nt believe him - who called in doctors to drug him up.edit on 24-7-2012 by bluemirage5 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by violet
Originally posted by shockedonlooker
I'm wondering about the tear gas too. I don't see anyone with vision or clothing issues Here in this post with vid further upthread. I don't know if tear gas burns the skin. No time stamp or known if this is the first known video of people outside. It's shakey / blurry and looked to be cell phone vid.edit on 7/24/2012 by shockedonlooker because: (no reason given)
My daughter got tear gassed by cops at the Vancouver riot and I don't recall her saying anything about her skin, just coughing and burning throat, eyes. She wasn't rioting btw, just got stuck in the crowd
Originally posted by HumanPLC
reply to post by ButterCookie
Yeah, i can vouch for the external burning.
I served with 23 parachute field ambulance (now part of 16 air assault brigade) and i can remember my first experience of CS Gas during our NBC training. Its stings like a right ole bugger and lasts for a good hour or so.
The stinging is actually made worse when you are sweating due to the sweat pores being open and so i would have imagined the effects would have been quite noticable on those involved (im sure they would have been sweating after running to get out of the theater)
Also, regarding decontamination, our decontamination drills involved using fullers earth powder and a cloth blotting pad. The technique we learned was called 'blot bang rub'.
Originally posted by detachedindividual
It's harrowing to listen to the radio audio. But it did reveal something to me that was otherwise unknown - he was still wearing the gas mask, or at least had it in his possession when he was found.
You can hear the officer when they discover him, and he describes him first as a male in a gas mask.
So how did the gas mask we have all seen end up at the other end of the building?
Was there more than one gas mask? Did an officer take it there, and why?