It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
It sounds like the Grays to me.
Originally posted by ProfessorT
This case has always amazed me just as much as the Roswell incident. It has got everything apart from actual aliens. There are many witnesses, adults and children who both describe seeing the object(s). There are many questions this case raises but may never be answered. I would suggest that everyone watches the fantastic documentary that was made about this. Not only does it show the government will always attempt to hide visitations from alien craft but they will also do their best to shut witnesses up. There are various things you can compare with other UFO cases.
Originally posted by ProfessorT
Not only does it show the government will always attempt to hide visitations from alien craft but they will also do their best to shut witnesses up.
Originally posted by VoidHawk
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
It sounds like the Grays to me.
I hope your right to be honest, it makes me angry to think that technology such as hovering saucers would be denied to the rest of the world.
As I said elsewhere in this thread, the sainer (more programmed) part of my mind tells me these craft were made on earth, However, their size and shape does indicate the occupants (if any) were quite small so would indicate that it could be the grays.
Originally posted by Nightchild
Originally posted by tones
sooooo where are the pictures the lady took?
lemme guess
they didnt come out when developed
or the government intercepted them from their local Walgreens of their time
Maybe you simply did not read it thoroughly enough;
Graham Simmonds says he was prepped to tell the students that what they’d seen didn’t exist. He says he was given the job of walking up and down the corridors to keep the students in their rooms. While he was walking the corridors he saw the teacher who’d been taking photographs of the saucers struggling with people in uniform who were demanding she hand over her camera.
Originally posted by xxblackoctoberxx
reply to post by VoidHawk
i dont know if someone has already replied with this but just in case
skeptoid.com...
Originally posted by VoidHawk
Originally posted by ProfessorT
Not only does it show the government will always attempt to hide visitations from alien craft but they will also do their best to shut witnesses up.
Just take a look at some of the comments in this thread.
Originally posted by RoyBatty
In the two "bell" photos in the original OP, light falls on the side of the object regardless of whether it is upright or on it's side. If these photos were taken during the same sighting this just doesn't add up. If the sun is reflecting off the side of the object in the first photo, then in the second it wouldn't also be reflecting off the same part of the object when it is turned 90 degrees.
I don't doubt those people all saw something. It's possible it was a man-made UFO. It's also possible that these photos are fake but used to illustrate what those folks saw. The problem with them is that when you start looking at the reflections and realize they are probably fake, it lends less credibility to an otherwise very credible story.edit on 11-7-2012 by RoyBatty because: Correct a contraction
Originally posted by VoidHawk
Originally posted by RoyBatty
In the two "bell" photos in the original OP, light falls on the side of the object regardless of whether it is upright or on it's side. If these photos were taken during the same sighting this just doesn't add up. If the sun is reflecting off the side of the object in the first photo, then in the second it wouldn't also be reflecting off the same part of the object when it is turned 90 degrees.
I don't doubt those people all saw something. It's possible it was a man-made UFO. It's also possible that these photos are fake but used to illustrate what those folks saw. The problem with them is that when you start looking at the reflections and realize they are probably fake, it lends less credibility to an otherwise very credible story.edit on 11-7-2012 by RoyBatty because: Correct a contraction
I spotted that about the photo after I'd posted it. It's just one photo shown at two angles, which is the correct angle I dont know.
Well spotted though.
January 4, 1978 Miki-Cho, Kagawa, Japan Picture taken by Hirobumi Matsu#a at 3:00pm while with a friend. Object was a rare gold-metallic material. Matsu#a stated that UFO was under "intelligent control." He took several photos before object disappeared
Originally posted by cavalryscout
Awesome thread.
To begin with this is proof that just because a subject / topic has been discussed it doesn't mean you shouldn't be allowed to freshen it up a bit or expand on it. (imo neway.) I do think you should give credit to older (original) threads if you know of them.
Anyway I think they saw something but I'm leaning toward experimental aircraft. Probably Germany or something we stole from the Nazis.
I read somewhere that the airforce actually fabricated some of the ufo stories while they were testing the U2. They probably do the same crap today.
Originally posted by PhoenixOD
reply to post by lordaqua
It usually takes a lot more than just witness testimony alone to convict someone. In a courtroom it is a unique situation where a decision HAS to be reached. In court a 'decision' can be made on witness testimony but that does not make the testimony 'proof' which was the original claim made by the OP.
I might be able to provide 50 people that say that Elvis had lunch at my house yesterday but that doesnt prove he did. You might want to make a decision based on what they say but thats no proof.
Witnesses does not = proof.
So while the OP may have made a decision based on witness testimony there is no actual proof like he was claiming. Which is a shame, id love to see real proof of flying saucers.
edit on 10-7-2012 by PhoenixOD because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
Originally posted by VoidHawk
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
It sounds like the Grays to me.
I hope your right to be honest, it makes me angry to think that technology such as hovering saucers would be denied to the rest of the world.
As I said elsewhere in this thread, the sainer (more programmed) part of my mind tells me these craft were made on earth, However, their size and shape does indicate the occupants (if any) were quite small so would indicate that it could be the grays.
The Grays orchestrated the whole event.
The 2 saucers were only about 20 feet in diameter according to the witnesses.
That means they were probably remote controlled by a mothership overhead.
---------
It makes sense to deny the technology to the whole world.
Some of the technology involved is dual use technology.
- civilian and military applications -
This technology could be used to attack Israel if it wound up in the wrong hands.
----------
We have the right and the responsibility to protect our secrets.
Does this make sense to you?