It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Unown
Originally posted by Bilk22
Hey unknown, you seem like quite the expert. Can you comment on my posts above?
Thanks, but I'm only saying what I know.
Anyways, this is just my take on it:
You can easily "hack" into a router through Wi-Fi if the default password is still set. People who are knowledgeable generally change this. (There are ways to get into a protected router through Wi-Fi, but it requires time and resources the government wouldn't want to bother with.)
Hacking a router through the internet is a bit more messy. It mostly relies on exploits and the ignorance of the router owner. It may be easy or very difficult depending on the router settings. So I suppose it may work on those who don't know much about computers and things.
Some linksys routers recently got flashed without the owner's consent by Cisco themselves. Of course, it was because of a default setting on the router which allowed cisco to do that.
With so many kinds of routers being used, the feds would have to find an exploit that would work on all routers. Even if they were to succeed and would try to change something, tech experts would notice something was up with their routers and would immediately report on it, making the entire thing public.
So in my opinion, your scenario is possible, but improbable based on the resources needed and implications of such an act. There are much better ways to "control" the internet than attacking consumer owned devices. ISPs are one way of doing this. If the government can control ISPs, they can control the internet.
Like I said, it's just my take on this. I wouldn't expect an attack like this from the government.
Originally posted by Bilk22
Maybe I used the wrong terminology. I should have said modem vs router. An ISP doesn't need to hack a modem. They can access it directly. This is where I see them gaining access to flash the modem so that it directs all data simultaneously to the ISP and the government data center. This gives the government the capability to shut down internet service of whom ever they deem appropriate for what ever they see as a reason.
All the government needs are the access codes from each service provider for every modem they have issued. They send the magic bullet flash to every modem all at once. Some may work with no issues and some may fry the modem or need rebooting. Maybe this is why they say some people will lose service.
I don't know, but this to me would be the way to control internet access by the government.
Originally posted by demongoat
Originally posted by Bilk22
Maybe I used the wrong terminology. I should have said modem vs router. An ISP doesn't need to hack a modem. They can access it directly. This is where I see them gaining access to flash the modem so that it directs all data simultaneously to the ISP and the government data center. This gives the government the capability to shut down internet service of whom ever they deem appropriate for what ever they see as a reason.
All the government needs are the access codes from each service provider for every modem they have issued. They send the magic bullet flash to every modem all at once. Some may work with no issues and some may fry the modem or need rebooting. Maybe this is why they say some people will lose service.
I don't know, but this to me would be the way to control internet access by the government.
sorry but i think you need to learn more about networks.
there is no "access codes for modems, they have accounts that are tied to MAC addresses on the modems, and the internet service providers control access to them.
the government wouldn't need anything routed to them, all they would need is a program called a packet sniffer, anyone can get those.
i'm not sure how you think cable modems and cable routers work, but the manufacturers could just place a backdoor if they wanted, no need to flash anything.
besides the isps are far too willing to log what you do anyway, so if the government wants to know what you are doing they can force the isps.
heck given that someone has shown how to dump malware onto your rom and cmos, the government could get motherboard manufacturers to do it.
why anyone would is beyond me, they would be committing financial suicide.
Originally posted by GenerationGap
You've heard the story. There's a vicious virus that's been floating around for some months now, and on Monday the FBI will be isolating machines that are infected, leaving affected machines in a cyber no man's land.
The story of this virus is a FALSE FLAG EVENT.
This is a government test brother. The "DNS Virus" is not a virus, it's a program that is in it's BETA phase, its a portion of the EAS program. You know the internet kill switch given to Obama at the start of his Presidency, this is part of that infrastructure. On Monday they are testing it, or rather I should write "arming" it.
This "virus" is a government program. They are testing their ability to alter the DNS record databases nationwide, something never done before and actually quite complicated, courtesy not of the FBI, but DHS. Again its complicated, and the odds of something going wrong, are high. This little BS story about our Federal Government helping to protect us from an existing virus is just that, a cover story. A mini-false flag if you will.
Essentially, this is DHS putting us behind their firewall that they control on Monday. If your network goes down its not because you have a virus...It's because you don't have THEIR program (the real virus IHMO). If you don't have their program, you wont be routed through their firewalls/controlled DNS Record databases. On Monday they arm it for the first time; and if everything goes well, on Tuesday Obama, and every President after him will have the ability to either cut the internet off, or reroute all requests to an "Emergency Alert System" page, but only in the event of a catastrophe or uncivilized uprising (Read as False Flag Event). Monday is a big day.
About the Internet Kill Switch:
www.switched.com...
China Tested their Kill Switch in April, now it's our turn:
www.zdnet.com...
FEMA's page on the EAS for background information:
www.fema.gov...
We thought we stopped SOPA, I've got bad news fellow countrymen, on Monday we get behind the firewall by law or by crook.
No, there's no link to Fox News, InfoWars, Aljezeera, or RT. And there will be no link. This is only common sense and I'm shocked if I'm the first person to recognize this. A false flag is being waved and we're being duped into following it right to McAfee:
www.siteadvisor.com...
This has False Flag and Government Social Engineering by fear BS all over it.
Come on DHS, you can do better than this.
edit on 7-7-2012 by GenerationGap because: Typos, likely to fix more.
Originally posted by Aliensun
After reading into three pages of discussion on this matter, I personally find it a bit scary in that so many self-styled experts on this matter have dozens of pros and cons as to the real nature of this coming event and what it REALLY means. If the technology is that grabled that few understand it from one end to another, than that is reason to be concerned. Basically, it is exactly similar to software hacking and hacking and hacking of what is said and assuredly told to us time and time again, that, "OK, the problem is fixed now."
And isn't there always backdoors into every computer system, and haven't some of us older folks lived through time after time where we were assured that, "Aw, the government wouldn't/couldn't do that to us would they?"
"Trust not in what your country can do for you but in what it can do to you."
(A slight paraphrase of JFK.)
If anyone can point me to some basic, easy to understand threads on this site, or even an online crash course , it would be much appreciated.
I have windows 7 Heehaw , and I just checked services, and couldn't see anything listed as remote access.?
When setting up my home network, I did press NO.. on all the options for allowing remote access.. is that good enough? What else should I look for under services because some services seems to not have the option to be disabled, and is listed as automatic.