It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by beezzer
How about you be fair? Put up what you're asking of an entire movement. What's wrong with the world?
So no healthcare issues? No free college issues?
Originally posted by Kali74
1. Resisting the corrosive influence of money in government and policy all over the world that has created an enormous disparity between the .01% and the rest of us.
2. Non-violence.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Kali74
Now be fair. I'm being serious.
Debating anyone supporting OWS is like bowling with smoke.
If you know their "core values" then I formally challenge you to a debate.
*tosses a gauntlet*
Originally posted by petrus4
Also, I continue to admire your tenacity, Kali, even if I do suspect it is largely for a lost cause. Jibeho, beezzer, and their conservative ilk are not interested in anything remotely resembling rational debate, where Occupy are concerned. They troll, purely for the joy of trolling.
We can say whatever we like, and the response will always come directly from the perpetual tape loop inside their heads.
"Get a bath, a shave, and a job, filthy hippie scum."edit on 3-7-2012 by petrus4 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by beezzer
I thought you wanted core values? Health care and student debt are talking points, side effects... but if we put them on a sign, we're accused of not having a concise message? So are we (Occupiers) supposed to talk about those or not? I thought you wanted us to narrow our focus. Though, I suppose if we did only say that there's a wealth disparity... you would run around saying prove it.
Originally posted by beezzer
How about a consistant message?
How about a clear, consise message?
If Occupy has such a thing then can you list them?
Police arrested 26 Occupy movement members during a protest outside the Pennsylvania Convention Center Sunday night. The 20 men and six women were charged with disorderly conduct and obstructing traffic during the protest on the 1200 block of Race Street, police said.
Police swarmed around City Hall and rousted Occupy Philadelphia protesters from their encampment overnight, more than two days after a deadline passed for them to leave. The occupiers responded by roaming around Center City, scattering and regrouping with police following their every move in a chaotic night of cat-and-mouse that ended before daylight.
"The Dilworth occupation is over," Mayor Nutter said at a news conference just before 7 a.m. Crews were using bulldozers and other heavy equipment to clear up debris and fire hoses to wash down Dilworth Plaza as he spoke.
PHILADELPHIA (AP) — More than two dozen protesters with Occupy's national gathering have been arrested after a spontaneous march to Philadelphia's City Hall.
Occupy Philadelphia member Nate Kleinman says the arrests happened around 9 p.m. Sunday. He says a group of people attending the national conference had been on a spontaneous "solidarity march" to City Hall when they were arrested. He says the march wasn't part of the conference's organized events.
Philadelphia police say 26 protesters were arrested and are being charged with disorderly conduct and obstructing a highway, both summary offenses
Originally posted by FlyersFan
And so it begins .... and it isn't even the 4th of July yet.
They are just there for a get together to discuss the 'movement', eh?
Bull crap. And this is just what is being reported.
Originally published Nov. 30, 2011
9 Occupiers Arrested in big fight at Comcast Center 'Sit in'
ETA
Picture from Occupy Philly .. the sign says 'do not litteredit on 7/4/2012 by FlyersFan because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by beezzer
I'm not backtracking even a 1/4 of an inch. You want all this "clarity" on your terms and when I deliver you want me to expand but expansion causes you to say we lack clarity. That is intellectually dishonest, part of debating is conceding when your opponent has made a valid point, not continue moving goal posts. So I refer you back to the cartoon I posted because it is simple enough. Come back to me when you're more interested in knowing than being right.edit on 4-7-2012 by Kali74 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by beezzer
Think of it as a visual aide.
I'm not the one in need of such, you are.