It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
No, they won't help. They will assume it's someone elses problem. MANY people would be left out to live with untreated medical problems and unecessary suffering. The system is set up so that each individual takes care of their self, this is capitalism, it works to ensure people make an effort. We know that this is a good thing for our countries wealth when we compare with communist countries. However, some things must transcend that system and one of them is health. Countries must take account of the fact their monetary/wealth systems create an atmosphere where selflessness is seen as foolish and put in place mechanisms to make sure fundamental things such as taking care of each others lives and health is not lost in the process. To put monetary systems first above all else is a form of extremism.
Originally posted by Masterjaden
Originally posted by fleabit
So are there no exceptions?
Someone who has a disease they can't control and makes it so they can't work - children who live in a group home and need medical care - your next door neighbor is older and retired, but her sad social security doesn't allow her to pay for the medical attention she needs - they should all just be sick and die? Because otherwise, they are basically making you their slave?
The lack of compassion in this country is pathetic. We have a HORRIBLE health care system. Most countries
CARE FOR their fellow citizens - their health care is multitudes better. Their unemployment is multitudes better. Because they realize the real value is human life. Not owning 3 SUVs, 2 55" tvs and then complaining because your hard earned money dares be spent on someone who desperately needs medical care.
It's so very sad how our country is progressing. People care about them - their little family and nothing else. A thousand years ago, people actually visited and knew their neighbors. They cared for their fellow humans. We are losing our ability to be social - and to care at all for anything that doesn't directly benefit YOU.
If you want to complain - complain about military spending. The astronomical amounts spent by our government for our military for even one year, would probably subsidize an amazing health care system for ALL our citizens for 20 years.
No the difference is that I feel that society will willingly elp those in need and you feel that all of society must be forced at the point if a gun to do so
Jaden
Originally posted by Open_Minded Skeptic
Show us all the language in the law that says doctors will be dragged out at gun point to provide medical service. That is a pretty big deal, should be easy to find. We'll wait. (and wait and wait most likely)
No the difference is that I feel that society will willingly elp those in need and you feel that all of society must be forced at the point if a gun to do so
Jaden
Originally posted by Masterjaden
I came upon an interesting thought while discussing Obamacare in another forum I frequent where people were trying to claim that healthcare is a right...
I don't understand how ANYONE can claim that a service provided by another is a right... That would infer that you have the right to force someone to work for you. That is THE definition of slavery.
Anyone who advocates that healthcare is a right, advocates for slavery.
The hypocratic oath does not infer forced servitude. It is a man's personal honor to keep their word. The Doctor still must have the choice whether to do so or not. Non action on the part of the doctor does NOT amount to murder.
Jadenedit on 1-7-2012 by Masterjaden because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by mr3dboot
reply to post by Masterjaden
For anyone who seriously like Obamacare, I have an idea for you.
Just wait and see.
Do you really think that Justice Roberts would side with the liberals unless he knew something?
Forcibly taking from one to give to someone else, is called robbery
Originally posted by mr3dboot
reply to post by Open_Minded Skeptic
The GOP is not trying to stop anyone from voting. Seriously, do you ever read anything other than Democratic talking points?
Dead people and illegals shouldn't vote. Funny that you see it the other way.
Showing a state issued ID to vote is a great idea and I can't wait until all 50 states enforce it.
What's that? Puts a burden on the elderly? On those who can't afford it? How about you in your sincere sense of decency to all Americans shell out exactly $4.18 and pay for an ID for someone.
Bet you haven't read that states are willing to forgo costs for those who can't afford one have you?
No ID=No Vote.
Your dead?=No Vote
In this country illegally?=No Vote
People who disagree with these three simple thoughts are either willfully ignorant or on the DNC payroll.
It is forcible. "Our" representatives do not represent us at all. They represent the corporations and the wealthy.
Originally posted by CB328
Forcibly taking from one to give to someone else, is called robbery
It's not really forcible, because we all elect our representatives who create the taxation. Since you republicans hate society you should all move to the Sahara desert where you be completely unaccountable and can live in the hell you wish on everyone else.