It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by yourmaker
I live by a simple quote.
"A guy told me one time, "Don't let yourself get attached to anything you are not willing to walk out on in 30 seconds flat if you feel the heat around the corner."
What is it exactly that I would die for? I don't know yet.
Originally posted by charles1952
Is it logical to die to earn a good reputation when you're no longer alive to enjoy it? I would argue that you are almost right, but that it is not to impress others, but to make living with yourself bearable. if I did something incredibly vile just to save my own life, say turn in a dozen friends, I'd like to think I would hate myself from that day forward. It wasn't that long ago that people being given a white feather for cowardice would kill themselves for shame. I think some of that remains.
Would you jump in front of a bullet to save someone you didn't know? How about someone you hated?
I'm sorry I'm not addressing your other comments. If you feel they're particularly important, let's discuss them, but they seemed a little, I don't know, political? That's not the word I want, but I don't know how to say it.
With respect,
Charles1952
I'm not trying to persuade anyone to go one way or the other. (Yet. I may change my mind and try to force an agenda down everyone's throat. ) Just exploring here, if we save them because we love them, are we just saying "I'm willing to give my life up for people I am willing to give my life up for?"
Would you jump in front of a bullet to save someone you didn't know? How about someone you hated?
No I wouldn't. I am more important to me than he is. Name me one good reason why I should go out of my way, get myself shot and die for someone I either don't know or hate. I know it sounds cold, but that's because men are taught to lay down their lives for others regardless of their value.
You're absolutely right, that's why I was saying I was having trouble finding the right word. I agree that I don't know what dying for my country means. Clear thinking demands we say something a bit more concrete. Perhaps, "These invaders will set up a system where no one can speak freely. I want my family, friends, heck, everybody, to be able to speak freely. If my death helps stop the invasion, I'm ready for it."
On the contrary! They are void of politics.
No I wouldn't. I am more important to me than he is. Name me one good reason why I should go out of my way, get myself shot and die for someone I either don't know or hate. I know it sounds cold, but that's because men are taught to lay down their lives for others regardless of their value.
Doing what is right!!. (Sorry, I get excited sometimes.) We need a society, a world, where "doing what is right" is the accepted thing to do, the expected thing to do, the celebrated thing to do.
In these circumstances you don't expect to die, you are just intent on doing what is right.
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by LesMisanthrope
Dear LesMisanthrope,
I'm delighted to see that you are getting the approval that your posts deserve. As you can probably tell, I am not pushing an agenda here (that I know of), I'm hoping to get people to explore. You are pointing us down an additional path, making our exploration more thorough.
I'm not trying to persuade anyone to go one way or the other. (Yet. I may change my mind and try to force an agenda down everyone's throat. ) Just exploring here, if we save them because we love them, are we just saying "I'm willing to give my life up for people I am willing to give my life up for?"
Would you jump in front of a bullet to save someone you didn't know? How about someone you hated?
No I wouldn't. I am more important to me than he is. Name me one good reason why I should go out of my way, get myself shot and die for someone I either don't know or hate. I know it sounds cold, but that's because men are taught to lay down their lives for others regardless of their value.
You're absolutely right, that's why I was saying I was having trouble finding the right word. I agree that I don't know what dying for my country means. Clear thinking demands we say something a bit more concrete. Perhaps, "These invaders will set up a system where no one can speak freely. I want my family, friends, heck, everybody, to be able to speak freely. If my death helps stop the invasion, I'm ready for it."
On the contrary! They are void of politics.
You're right, it can become so abstract as to be meaningless. Maybe the word "politics" came into my head because abstract, meaningless, generalities seem to be the particular tool of politicians. I meant nothing critical of you at all.
With respect,
Charles1952
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
reply to post by LesMisanthrope
No I wouldn't. I am more important to me than he is. Name me one good reason why I should go out of my way, get myself shot and die for someone I either don't know or hate. I know it sounds cold, but that's because men are taught to lay down their lives for others regardless of their value.
You never know what you will do until faced with the situation.
I think I would feel that I did right attempting to prevent you from killing the evil Dr. (I forgot what the evil doctor's name was.)
You see a man killing another. You rush into save the victim and in the process kill the attacker. Later you find out that that attacker, was me trying to kill a man would undoubtedly kill thousands. Who in this case should have died?
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by LesMisanthrope
Dear LesMisanthrope,
That's not fair!! I'm supposed to be the one that gets to avoid the tough questions. All right, you've caught me.
I think I would feel that I did right attempting to prevent you from killing the evil Dr. (I forgot what the evil doctor's name was.)
You see a man killing another. You rush into save the victim and in the process kill the attacker. Later you find out that that attacker, was me trying to kill a man would undoubtedly kill thousands. Who in this case should have died?
Your attempt was outside the normal channels of justice, and I'm assuming there was nothing there that made it obvious that the evil Dr. had to be killed. I hate to say it when it comes to life or death, but I think I would have played the odds and protected the evil Dr. against you.
You're asking "Who should have died?" May I answer first, that I don't see anything that I did wrong in protecting the evil Dr. I acted with good intentions, with all the knowledge that was available to me, and there was no time to get more information.
Who should have died? That's easy. Not you, 'cause you're a nice man, you have candy (Excuse me, I'm getting punchy) I think this may be one of the causes of war and hatred; the need, or desire, to act with insufficient information. (We screw up, because we're ignorant, in other words.) I believe this is one of the reasons why the Bible (Sorry, no agenda meant) tells us not to judge. Besides the fact it does something to us, we don't know enough to judge well.
With respect,
Charles1952
I think I understand. They are pure, innocent, and could grow into anything. There is so much hope and future there. Perhaps that's why real men would cry "Women and Children First!" Children are worth sacrificing for. You have done well, a brave warrior wounded, but not defeated.
Children.
I salute you and the other warriors in this fight. I'm saddened to tears by the stories you all are sharing with us, but what triumph and hope shines through you to the world. I'm honored that you have told a bit of your lives, I'll draw hope from it. Thank you.
I've stood up for people and been beaten senseless for my chivalry in the past. But it's like the old saying, "for evil to prevail good men simply must do nothing." I'd rather stand up and be counted and risk being killed than stand by and allow someone's suffering to continue.