It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by ajay59
I think me and Ajay got it.
We have stars.
This is to comical.
Ajay I hope you aren't stick'in me with this theory ? I just answered the question with what I know. And noticing the time stamps, you tied me with the same answer. So that makes this your theory too stud. If you want to play pointy finger ?edit on 26-6-2012 by randyvs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by bearwithredhat
Here's the post AGAIN...
The only known device that can shift a 10,000 ton block of stone with ease in a single lift is… A ZEPPELIN.
As a basis, I have assumed that the central roadways were not roadways, but, in effect, a shipyard for the construction of Zeppelins, built in hard wood, and filled with hydrogen. The original, late Victorian Zeppelins actually were filled with pig’s bladders filled with hydrogen.
By using the stats for the Hindenburg I scaled up on the basis of the length of the main roadway through Puma Punku (which I believe was a mile long). I substituted the weight of lumber for steel. The lift was lower, but there would have been no passenger section to weigh it down. The result was a Zeppelin with a net lift marginally in excess of 10,000 tons, just great enough to have moved Baalbeck’s biggest stones.
Had a Zeppelin been used it would explain lists of things. Since these would have been dangerous in narrow valleys it would actually would have been easier and safer to built near the tops of mountains and to have used only the biggest stones, rather than having all the loading time of small stones and for greater stability. Also, had a zeppelin got into trouble, one can quite imagine the crew jettisoning a big stone that ends up pointlessl half way up the mountainside below.
This would also explain the positioning of the pramids and megoliths. Using trade winds, these could have voyaged across the Atlantic to Central America then traveled up the eastern seaboard to cross the Atlantic on the way back coming out near north west France and Britain.
Arriving in Britain after a storm crossing, these zeppelins would need a new supply of hydrogen and repairs, hence the magnetized stone circles like Stonehenge. By putting a copper wire bound rota in the centre of Stonehenge turned by horses, Stone henge then becomes a vast alternator, capable of generating electricity that could be used to electorlyse sea, salt or march water to produce…hydrogen. It is interesting to note that in many ancient civiliszations like the Romans and Greeks, the God of the Sea was alaso the God of the horse and in Ancient Britain, the Horse was their God.
To get back to “base camp” at the Great Pyramid, the Zeppelins would need to cross the Alps at the most shallow passes. This would then explain Ley Lines as indeed, it was originally pointed out that they curiously resemble trade routes yet cross mountains as if they are not there.
Most of these Ley Lines come out at places like Delphi which again is built near the clear to of a mountain… and thence on to Egypt. This incidentally, would also explain why parts of Antarctica are mapped, but ONLY the parts which happent o have trade winds.
For the pyramids, I assumed that the Zeppelins might have been pulled by horses on the ground. Assuming two of these Zeppelins, one taking a day to load and one at the other end taking a day to unload, it gave a round trip of one week, and incredibly dropped out the figure of 21.7 years to move all the necessary stones.
Originally posted by Mickierocksman
A mile long Zeppelin hey…… ok, so tell me how the wind currents and updrafts would never be a problem (or did they only take flight or build on still days?)
Secondly, how did they dock and then fill the Zeppelin before loading up a 10K ton block for it to lift?
Thirdly, please calculate how much force would be exerted on say 100 teather ropes attached to a mile long Zeppelin with a wind speed of 60mph?
Originally posted by ajay59
Oh, how silly of me! I should have surmised that the ancients merely ran down to the local Exxon and purchased one hundred billion gallons of liquid hydrogen with their gold cards!
Oh, how silly of me! I should have surmised that the ancients merely ran down to the local Exxon and purchased one hundred billion gallons of liquid hydrogen with their gold cards!
Originally posted by bearwithredhat
Originally posted by Mickierocksman
A mile long Zeppelin hey…… ok, so tell me how the wind currents and updrafts would never be a problem (or did they only take flight or build on still days?)
At those heigths, the wind is lower, plus the heavy weight of the Zeppelin would give it some degree of stability.
Kijewise, Egypt is not know for its high winds.
Secondly, how did they dock and then fill the Zeppelin before loading up a 10K ton block for it to lift?
The blocks of stone have slots in them. One possibility would be to have a wood frame constructed around the block and have the zeppelin, in effect, slide part of its superstructure under the top edge of the top of the frame, like a sled upside down and, effectively snatch it into the air, bt there are various ways which might be considered.
Thirdly, please calculate how much force would be exerted on say 100 teather ropes attached to a mile long Zeppelin with a wind speed of 60mph?
Why 60 mph? Why 100 lines? Look the idea is that it follows the trade winds.
Originally posted by ajay59
Did they have access to high tensile steel cable? If not, what type of rope did they use? Can you tell me where I might find some of this material as I think I may be in the wrong line of work!
Originally posted by ajay59
Look son, give something tangible or what can I say? "That dog won't hunt"!edit on 26-6-2012 by ajay59 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ajay59
Ancient man never erected any stone monument with stones weighing more than a few tons! If anyone out there thinks different, PROVE IT!
In fact, I would like to see anyone prove beyond a shadow of a doubt, that ancient man built anything! That's what I thought, no proof just speculation!edit on 25-6-2012 by ajay59 because: (no reason given)
Coral Castle is a stone structure created by the Latvian American eccentric Edward Leedskalnin (1887-1951) north of the city of Homestead, Florida in Miami-Dade County at the intersection of South Dixie Highway (U.S. 1) and SW 157th Avenue. The structure comprises numerous megalithic stones (mostly limestone formed from coral), each weighing several tons.[2] It currently serves as a privately-operated tourist attraction. Coral Castle is noted for legends surrounding its creation that claim it was built single-handedly by Leedskalnin using magnetism and/or supernatural abilities.[3]
Originally posted by sonnny1
Originally posted by ajay59
Ancient man never erected any stone monument with stones weighing more than a few tons! If anyone out there thinks different, PROVE IT!
In fact, I would like to see anyone prove beyond a shadow of a doubt, that ancient man built anything! That's what I thought, no proof just speculation!edit on 25-6-2012 by ajay59 because: (no reason given)
hmmmmmm.
Coral Castle is a stone structure created by the Latvian American eccentric Edward Leedskalnin (1887-1951) north of the city of Homestead, Florida in Miami-Dade County at the intersection of South Dixie Highway (U.S. 1) and SW 157th Avenue. The structure comprises numerous megalithic stones (mostly limestone formed from coral), each weighing several tons.[2] It currently serves as a privately-operated tourist attraction. Coral Castle is noted for legends surrounding its creation that claim it was built single-handedly by Leedskalnin using magnetism and/or supernatural abilities.[3]
Coral Castle
Prove he didnt.....
edit on 26-6-2012 by sonnny1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by openeyeswideshut
So how would they have harnessed the hydrogen out of the air?edit on 26-6-2012 by openeyeswideshut because: wrong reply to