reply to post by ldyserenity
i agree with ur perspective on the matter, but let me b more extremist for my mind which cant function but radically or nothing
the thing is not more then nothing only smthg is more then nothing for sure
a thing, is ultimate absolute superiority to nothing while also free which confirm that absolute superiority
so imagine when a thing is that quality to nothing what about two and more things, it is really another dimension where any is the value of a true
thing there by itself freedom which is clear and completely different to another thing also there clear value freedom
this is the least that can say about true existence or true existing objects, i didnt invent any and it is really the least since i cant b but
objective so from what u r, and clearly u r from much below nothing since u cant even admit the linear way of thinking being existence of smthgs
reason
so i agree but,
what ur thinking is kindly not right so from lacking to know right, is what u naturally put the responsability of all on oneself, which cant b, it has
nothing to do with objective even as a principle fact, where u confirm it unconsciously since u mean the end as being the mirror clarity not reality
clarity of someself
the least dimension of true existence involve always much more then a freed intelligence, intelligence is to the relative character of superior
constancy justification so relative to objective value of smthg which is relative to objective absolute value of a thing
which is also the reason relatively to a pick intelligent that is confirmed by knowing how all is the same positive rule too making it free out of
intelligence as a plus to mean smthg else
back to the point, existence is for those freed superior intelligence right realities while of so for too truth freedom rights reality wills
so there is like us conscious that represent freedom rights to b real as freedom right separate to intelligence facts
and there is like very away freedom that true existence represent its full rights first to possess existence fact to its watever wills to do with
so there is infinite amount of free ones, smthg is free relatively representing one possible only freedom even out of relative thing, the freedom is
always one this is the point why one seem to b a rule, irrelatively if that freedom is right so out of absolute thing constancy or of objective value
or of absolute freedom superiority so watever, as long as there is objective relativity there is then always a pick free superior while that pick is
always only one even if u change u become another one, u cannot add freedom cmon like god invent to please ur will to be justified as wrong