Scientists Fear Fault in Alaska Could Generate a Killer Tsunami

reply to post by amongus

Watch the video (he'll appreciate the revenue), read along with the article.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by amongus

 

Watch the video, read along with the article.

I did....meh, somebody borrowed from other sources, but oh well. At least the info is here. The OP isn't trying to make money in his own blog by this, so I'm fine w it..

I don't get you lot, I really don't.
You whine and moan about people and their stupid doom porn youtube videos, who have no clue what they are talking about, lowering the quality of ATS blah blah blah.. Someone gets off their backside, goes out of their way to bring recent studies, and information to people, and you nit pick and drag them down..

Have it both ways. Why not?
Headdesk.jpg

reply to post by Phage


Something you don't like about that video I produced would you rather me take it off?

Its fair use in my eyes I produced that video as it was important subject matter.

Its fair use its what they do in the mainstream media all the time.

If you can do a better job please do but I work very hard on my website and all channels and I don't ask much from anyone at all I do it in my spare time after working a full time job

reply to post by Deplume

I have a problem with stealing.
It's also against the T&Cs of ATS.

reply to post by Deplume


I promised my subs I would give them at lest 2 - 3 investigation videos each week and two news updates and I post it on here and get attacked?! WTF!

reply to post by Phage


Its not stealing its fair use! Tell me what did I steal and why don't you moan at someone who is actually causing a problem

Originally posted by Somethingintheclouds
reply to post by Deplume

 

I promised my subs I would give them at lest 2 - 3 investigation videos each week and two news updates and I post it on here and get attacked?! WTF!

You work for subway?

reply to post by Somethingintheclouds

Attacked?
I'd call it busted.
The least you could have done is provided the source of you're "research". Word for word copying without stating that it is and without providing the source is plagiarism.

reply to post by amongus


I only enable ads on videos I own all content for as thats the rules of fair use

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Somethingintheclouds

 

Attacked?
I'd call it busted.
The least you could have done is provided the source of you "research".

Which I provided in the description of the video! Would you prefer it in the post too?

Phage: He didn't need to link to the article because he didn't quote the article in his opening post, and the article is clearly credited in the description of the youtube video. If you can;t be bothered to click and watch the vid on youtube, and see who gets credited in the description, that's your own problem.

I think being an antagonistic so-and-so should be against the T&C's of ATS...

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by amongus

 

Watch the video (he'll appreciate the revenue), read along with the article.

edit on 5/17/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)

revenue? I don't gain any from that video

reply to post by Deplume


I also think that attacking someone that is working really hard on something is also not fair

reply to post by Deplume

he didn't quote the article in his opening post

He did.

Originally posted by Somethingintheclouds
The next great Pacific tsunami may well come from Alaska according to new scientific research. If this will be anything like the great swells of seawater that region has kicked up in the past, it could cause death and destruction as far away as Hawaii and California!

Recent analysis of Alaska’s potential to generate a future tsunami which is highlighted in the May 8 issue of Eos, have turned up a worrisome similarity between the source of the magnitude 9.0 earthquake that generated the Japan tsunami and a particular segment of a major quake-prone fault running along the seafloor just south of Alaska’s Aleutian islands.

Earth Change News Investigates

see who gets credited in the description

Descriptions can be edited.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Deplume

 

he didn't quote the article in his opening post

He did.

see who gets credited in the description

Descriptions can be edited.

I might be new to this site but I have been here long enough to note that you discredit anything you don't like which is unfair

Yes you are entitled to your own view but slating someone for copyrighting when they have not is dam right out of order.

I know your considered a god in this site but your far from it because all you do is slate other people.

Originally posted by Somethingintheclouds

Yes you are entitled to your own view but slating someone for copyrighting when they have not is dam right out of order.

You are free to display and print for your personal, non-commercial use information you receive through the Discovery Sites. But you may not otherwise reproduce any of the materials without the prior written consent of the owner. You may not distribute copies of materials found on the Discovery Sites in any form (including by e-mail or other electronic means), without prior written permission from the owner.

dsc.discovery.com...

You used the entire article as your script. You did no independent research. You did not credit the source in the video. I don't have to ask if you obtained permission.

Originally posted by Phage

Originally posted by Somethingintheclouds

Yes you are entitled to your own view but slating someone for copyrighting when they have not is dam right out of order.

You used the article as your script. You did no independent research. You did not credit the source in the video.

You are free to display and print for your personal, non-commercial use information you receive through the Discovery Sites. But you may not otherwise reproduce any of the materials without the prior written consent of the owner. You may not distribute copies of materials found on the Discovery Sites in any form (including by e-mail or other electronic means), without prior written permission from the owner.

dsc.discovery.com...

edit on 5/17/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)

It is for non-commercial use and the whole video I have not used the article word for word really with the # they put on youtube your having a go at me I am fairly new to all this and I make one small mistake

You ever make a mistake in your life? Its fair use and I have cited the article in the video.

reply to post by Somethingintheclouds

I make one small mistake

Mistakes can be corrected but I'm not sure Discovery Channel or Sarah Simpson (the actual author) would consider it small.

It is not fair use.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Somethingintheclouds

 

I make one small mistake

Mistakes can be corrected but I'm not sure Discovery Channel or Sarah Simpson (the actual author) would consider it small.

It is not fair use.

edit on 5/17/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)

Right well I cant delete this post now can I?