It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ringlejames
reply to post by Lazarus Short
I sure hope you are joking. Hepatic coding. Really that is what I see as yeah right a made up story that has hidden codes. The hidden hepatic coding may hold value what ever it may be, but that is probably why I totally 100% irrevocably distrust anything the bible says as true. Forget anything about the Sumerians at this point,
Originally posted by ringlejames
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
In response to nibidu does exist. There is a story on msn RIGHT NOW about an astrophysicist that he has discovered a planet fitting nibirus historical dipiction messing with things orbital path, red, and volcanic. based on its internal tempreture. The size since it has just been seen 100% most definitely because of its long eliptical orbit the size is currently guesstimated to be anywhere from half to 4x the size of earth I will post a link in my next post
edit on 16-5-2012 by ringlejames because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by eletheia
reply to post by autowrench
Although it was 1869 when Swiss physician Friedrich Mischer first discovered DNA, it
was 1951 before Watson and Crick started work on unravelling it, and it was 1953 before
they published their results.
So at the time 'humans' were deciphering the 'stone' tablets of the Sumerians they (humans)
would have been unaware of the meaning of DNA?...Odd that, people's so far seperated by
time use the same words (DNA) when language alters with every generation!!
Many people do, but the FACT is,
In short, I find the Genesis account more believable than Sithcin-style half-baked theories.
Originally posted by ringlejames
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
In response to nibidu does exist. There is a story on msn RIGHT NOW about an astrophysicist that he has discovered a planet fitting nibirus historical dipiction messing with things orbital path, red, and volcanic. based on its internal tempreture. The size since it has just been seen 100% most definitely because of its long eliptical orbit the size is currently guesstimated to be anywhere from half to 4x the size of earth I will post a link in my next post
edit on 16-5-2012 by ringlejames because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by autowrench
reply to post by Lazarus Short
Many people do, but the FACT is,
In short, I find the Genesis account more believable than Sithcin-style half-baked theories.
all Zecharia Sitchin did was write some books based on what he found out. He did not make the story up, he did not "invent" the Sumerian Tablets. He was a writer. Please stop giving Zecharia Sitchin credit for everything having to do with Ancient Sumeria. Read some books, you will feel better.
Originally posted by Lazarus Short
Laz replies to Renegade2283:
I'll pass over most of your reply without comment, but don't you think you're grasping at straws with your undue attention to a "tiny possibility"? Then you say, "Give me a break"?? No, give me a break - I may not know as much as you on the subject of Egyptology (I did remember the correct name of the book after your admonishment, BTW), but I'll wager you know next to noting about the heptadic codes and Ivan Panin, and that's a guess based on your dissing it so offhandedly. Really, it serves no purpose for us to second-guess the knowledge of others on this forum, except concerning the specific things they post here.
No, I did not find what I was looking for, but what I was NOT looking for - an ability not all of us possess, just like the ability to see what you're looking at.
edit on 16-5-2012 by Lazarus Short because: lah-de-dah
Originally posted by Lazarus Short
Laz replies to Renegade2283:
(I did remember the correct name of the book after your admonishment, BTW),
edit on 16-5-2012 by Lazarus Short because: lah-de-dah
The Book of the Dead is the Modern name of an ancient Egyptian funerary text, used from the beginning of the New Kingdom (around 1550 BC) to around 50 BC. The original Egyptian name for the text, transliterated rw nw prt m hrw is translated as "Book of Coming Forth by Day".Another translation would be "Book of emerging forth into the Light"
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
DNA testing has also been done and discovered that out of several thousand people located in different parts of the world, hidden within their mitochondrial DNA is the DNA of one matriarch, their lineage goes all the way back to one mother. So this lends credence to the fact that all mankind once had the same matriarch and that would mean that the story of Noah and his sons and their wives surviving isn't some bedouin's bullsh*t campfire stories. Back in ancient times it was not uncommon for your sister or half sister to end up your wife, or your female first cousins, so people were interbreeding.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
So we all have the same or similar stories of creation. Wow who knew? Being that our faiths originated in the same area amoung people who were cousins (decendends of Ham, Shem and Japheth) it's pretty much a no brainer as to why we have stories of ceation that are very similiar .
I however i am not going to jump on Sitchin's boat that these "Watchers" who came from heaven are friendly, or they wouldn't have screwed with man to make monsters (like the Chimera or Harpy) or the Nephilim giant slave races who according to the Book of Giants found with the Dead Sea Scrolls were 450 feet tall (think ancient Greek Titan myths, this is where they came from folks) and who were throwing around giant blocks that weighed 1 million to 1.5 million pounds like the Ba'albek stone below.
Originally posted by Renegade2283
And I do not deny that many of the stories in the bible probably occurred. Probably not exactly as described mind you. But there is an element of truth to most of the statements in the bible. However you can not deny that no bible we have to day is "original" so to say.
Also, the heptadic coding kinda gives credence to the idea that some of the bible must be metaphorical and some maybe entirely fabricated. If it wasn't so then it would be impossible for the coding to work.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
The proof of the real God is the one who answers his believers prayers when they need him to most and in ways they can never foresee.
Originally posted by novastrike81
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
The proof of the real God is the one who answers his believers prayers when they need him to most and in ways they can never foresee.
I guess the god of the Bible isn't real since he doesn't answer most believers prayers. That's one of the main reasons believers fall away from Christianity. I definitely didn't have my prayers answered.