It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Text
1) Massacre of unarmed merchants during sacred month~
Date: Late January(Rejeb), 623 A.D.
Place: Nakhla
Victims: 4 Merchants from Quraysh tribe of Mecca, the Tribe to which Muhammad himself belonged.
Four UNARMED merchants were travelling to Mecca to sell their goods consisting of raisins, honey and animal skins. It was the holy month of Rejeb which was considered sacred for trade in Arabia. It was a point of honour that any form of warfare or violence was strictly forbidden in this month.
Muhammad 's gang attacked the helpless men from behind and stabbed two of them to death. They plundered all the goods as booty and Muhammad got one fifth as his share.
This shows the utter lack of morals or scruples on Muhammad's part. The 'Prophet of Islam' did not possess a shred of pity or kindness, or the slightest sense of justice. He cold-bloodedly murdered two innocent people who had never done him any harm and did not even know him! All this was done in a month that the Prophet himself declared was a sacred month in which no warfare should take place. Muhammad was obviously motivated by nothing but hatred and greed.
Conveniently, divine revelations came down from his always abiding Allah that absolved him of all the guilt.
Al Baqara 2:216 "Warfare is ordained for you, though it is hateful unto you; but it may happen that you hate a thing which is good for you and it may happen that you love a thing which is bad for you. Allah knoweth, you knew not."
Here Muhammad is completely removing all blame from himself, for having started the fighting.
The most insidious and devilish implication of this verse is that Allah is completely justifying and sanctioning Muhammad's murder of the innocent Meccans. Over and above this, Muhammad is conveniently implying that warfare is hateful to him, but that he instigated it because it was ordained by Allah! What moral sacrifices the "Apostle of Peace" had to make!
Al Baqara 2:217 "They question you (O Muhammad) with regard to warfare in the sacred month. Say: Warfare therein is a great transgression but to turn men from the way of Allah and to disbelive in Him and the inviolable place of worship and to expel its people thence is a greater transgression, for persecution is worse than killing"
Here Allah is clearly saying that to kill or create warfare in the sacred month of Rejeb is a very grave offence, but to justify his own violation of Allah's rules, Muhammad comes up with the idea that since the people killed were unbelievers, it was perfectly all right!
The reason given for the horrific murder of the innocent Meccans, is the fact that they did not believe in Muhammad 's version of Allah. How much more tolerant and kind could the "Great Prophet" be!
Originally posted by iIuminaIi
Ooh , one word to describe you 0_o "Weak"...Should i expose more ? I'm truely, a bible expert...
No. What I said was accurate. There is nothing new in Islam. It's bits and pieces of other religions, and sprinkled iwth misogyny, politicalisms and so-called 'visions', all put togther by it's cult founder.
Originally posted by skOrpiOn
Newsflash: Islam was never meant to be a "new" religion. It was simply a continuation of the religion of Abraham, Noah, Enoch and all those other Old Testament figures.
Originally posted by sk0rpi0n
reply to post by FlyersFan
No. What I said was accurate. There is nothing new in Islam. It's bits and pieces of other religions, and sprinkled iwth misogyny, politicalisms and so-called 'visions', all put togther by it's cult founder.
Newsflash: Islam was never meant to be a "new" religion. It was simply a continuation of the religion of Abraham, Noah, Enoch and all those other Old Testament figures.
How come no one in ATS talks about Hinduism and the way it oppresses the population in India
Originally posted by Sahabi
reply to post by azulejo
Why is it ok for the Qur'an to attack the beliefs of Christians by saying Jesus is not the Son of God and saying he did not get crucified? This is offensive to Christians.
Why is it ok for the Qur'an to attack Jews, Sabians, Idolaters, Atheists, Apostates, and non-believers of Islam?
Yet you decry a forum thread debating Islam?
Who poisoned Muhammad is a completely relevant question and fine point of religious debate.
Originally posted by sk0rpi0n
Newsflash: Islam was never meant to be a "new" religion. It was simply a continuation of the religion of Abraham, Noah, Enoch and all those other Old Testament figures.
Originally posted by redneck13
reply to post by azulejo
Again, you seek to cloud the issue on this thread. Do not tell me I am or am not this or that because I am not this or that. You dribble is meaningless. I would not ask a Muslim anything and expect the truth as it is OK to line to an infidel, correct?
Do not try to come here spouting about a fascist, abusive, racially discriminating religion. In an attempt to taint the investigation of
The title of the thread is
Who killed the prophet Muhammad? A 1400 year old murder mystery