It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We dont know who they are we dont know if it is a hoax or not, IT COULD BE A HOAX
Originally posted by Snakedoctorjw
Wait ANTONIO HIMSELF CALLS IT A HOAX in this damn interview! @ 21:00 min He says
>>We dont know who they are we dont know if it is a hoax or not, it could be a hoax
Nope, he did not call it that, but he did say they don't know if it's a hoax or not hoax (just like he said that in another ATS thread), and yes, he also said it could be a hoax, but you forgot to include that he also said they can't prove whether it's a hoax or not hoax...
Originally posted by DJW001
But he knows it's a hoax!
He's just a liar.
Nope, you're the one who are spreading lies...
Originally posted by DJW001
I know you are, but what am I?
Originally posted by artich0ke
reply to post by IAMTAT
"Enthusiast" to say the least. Overall, nothing is more disappointing than inconsistencies. And I agree with what you said about his opportunity to address Sovar's contribution. It almost seems as if he is making every attempt to distance Sovar and the video... But information shows that the connection and suspicious is too hard to ignore--especially since Sovar works at hotel and is likely the Security Manager referenced to by Paris... Check this out:
19:12 Paris claims that Barnhart, the lead investigator, interviewed TWO witnesses.
20:17 Paris again reiterates that there were two witnesses.
23:06 Paris claims there were THREE witnesses. Paris did not shed light on the third witness' testimony.
25:30 Paris again claims they spoke to two witnesses.
25:51 to 26:23 Paris mentions main witness was not present when the MIB showed up. Paris says the second witness is a security manager. Again, no mention of the third witness.
Hmmmm.