It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There is no word for eternal in the Old Testament
It also says that someone who claims time is an illusion seems to have ignored special relativity and general relativity....
They were considered adopted sons into the family? Yet, they had masters whom they had to obey. It is our moral obligation to help people out in their time of need, not make them your servant in order to do so. Don't you see this? If I see a family starving, to help them should I make them my servants? Or, should we as a community help them out? Which is more moral?
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Bond servants chose to serve out of love for the family. It was a position of rank in the household. They were considered adopted sons into the family. And what don't you grasp about this concept that in that culture freedom for some folks meant freedom to starve to death? How was a person to grow food without land? How were they to eat if they couldn't hunt or fish?
What does the Hebrew say?
Originally posted by Akragon
reply to post by jmdewey60
There is no word for eternal in the Old Testament
The eternal God is thy refuge, and underneath are the everlasting arms: and he shall thrust out the enemy from before thee; and shall say, Destroy them.
Isn't that from the OT?
See, I was talking about time in our reality this whole time. I'm not talking about time in those other dimensions. I'm talking about in our reality. How did we get on this anyway?
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
It's not an illusion FOR US, we live in the 4th dimension. In the grand scheme of things, and relevant to this argument it's an illusion, there is no time in eternity. There is no time in the 5th - 10th dimensions, you need mass, gravity, and velocity for there to be time.
Originally posted by Hydroman
They were considered adopted sons into the family? Yet, they had masters whom they had to obey. It is our moral obligation to help people out in their time of need, not make them your servant in order to do so. Don't you see this? If I see a family starving, to help them should I make them my servants? Or, should we as a community help them out? Which is more moral?
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Bond servants chose to serve out of love for the family. It was a position of rank in the household. They were considered adopted sons into the family. And what don't you grasp about this concept that in that culture freedom for some folks meant freedom to starve to death? How was a person to grow food without land? How were they to eat if they couldn't hunt or fish?
That's why I said time exists, it just depends on the reference point.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
"Gravitational Time Dilation 2 astronauts"
Originally posted by Hydroman
See, I was talking about time in our reality this whole time. I'm not talking about time in those other dimensions. I'm talking about in our reality. How did we get on this anyway?
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
It's not an illusion FOR US, we live in the 4th dimension. In the grand scheme of things, and relevant to this argument it's an illusion, there is no time in eternity. There is no time in the 5th - 10th dimensions, you need mass, gravity, and velocity for there to be time.
Originally posted by Hydroman
That's why I said time exists, it just depends on the reference point.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
"Gravitational Time Dilation 2 astronauts"
No they didn't what? The bible says "Servants, obey your Masters," does it not? Next, you still haven't answered my question on beating your servant. It clearly states it in the bible that as long as they don't die after two days from the beating, it's ok. Do you deny this? You STILL have not answered that.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
No they didn't, a bond servant served freely, it was an honor to be one. An adopted son with all the rights and privileges a son would have. Look up what a "doulos" is.
I've already said the model you're thinking of is immoral and not permitted Biblically. Why are you still arguing with me?
Or get their "physics" from a YouTube video religion guru.
So someone who claims time is an illusion or isn't fundamental seems to have ignored or dismissed SR and GR, and did so without any explanation.
My original question? It was "Is it moral to allow the sacrifice of an innocent creature to atone for your wrong doings?"
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
What's your question?
Originally posted by Akragon
reply to post by jmdewey60
There is no word for eternal in the Old Testament
The eternal God is thy refuge, and underneath are the everlasting arms: and he shall thrust out the enemy from before thee; and shall say, Destroy them.
Isn't that from the OT?
I agree with that, if there is anything outside the 4th dimension. But, it does exist depending on the reference point. Wherever I am in this dimension, when I wave my hand so much time has passed. It is relative to my location.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
It's still a physical property here, it's not uniform. Even here it's not a constant, outside the 4th dimension it's non-existant.
Originally posted by Hydroman
My original question? It was "Is it moral to allow the sacrifice of an innocent creature to atone for your wrong doings?"
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
What's your question?
At least you're honest. You can't decide what is moral or immoral without your ancient book. Again, I am glad you live in our day and TIME so that you have some kind of guide.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Since I cannot appeal to the Bible and must appeal to my own immorality, I'm disqualified from answering because Moral Relativism is a self-refuting fallacy.
Next question?
Originally posted by Hydroman
I agree with that, if there is anything outside the 4th dimension. But, it does exist depending on the reference point. Wherever I am in this dimension, when I wave my hand so much time has passed. It is relative to my location.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
It's still a physical property here, it's not uniform. Even here it's not a constant, outside the 4th dimension it's non-existant.
The literal meaning of the Hebrew word is, from of a former age.
The eternal God is thy refuge, and underneath are the everlasting arms: and he shall thrust out the enemy from before thee; and shall say, Destroy them.
If your daughter gets raped, is it ok to make her marry the person who raped her? What does your bible say?
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Next question?
You can't decide what is moral or immoral without your ancient book.