Trayvon Martin Shooter Told Cops Teenager Went For His Gun

reply to post by WP4YT


Very good points you bring up....I have been wondering about the 3 day lapse...is it even true?

It adds more fuel to the fire if it is.

Did his mother not try to contact him from Miami and why didn't dad and girlfriend realize he didn't come home?

Does he have a history of just taking off for days doing god knows what...or did parents just not care that son didn't come home for 3 days. I would have living at the police station, pestering them to find my kid.

Anyone remember (dating myself here) back in the 70's they had those little announcements before the news?

"It's 11 o'clock, do you know where your children are?" Maybe parents need reminders again.

reply to post by timetothink


They filed a missing persons report....

Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by popsmayhem

 

You realize that damns Zimmerman further right? No signs of struggle on either of them points towards murder, not self defense, not manslaughter...murder.

It must be so frustrating for you not to be able to link directly to Stormfront.

edit on 29-3-2012 by Kali74 because: (no reason given)

Just because that BIAS one sided argumented article says that it does not support zimmermans
claim does not mean it is true. Have you people learnt nothing?
We know he hit someone, evidence is zimmermans face.
People came running out of the house, and there are witnesses
who were there and zimmerman had NO TIME to injure himself.
So if he did not injure himself then treyvon injured him.
Which means since treyvon injured him and he has no bruises
or marks that zimmerman NEVER PUNCHED OR TOUCHED HIM AT ALL.
If zimmerman never punched treyvon at all then we know that it was treyvon
who instigated the whole thing by putting his hands on zimmerman

reply to post by popsmayhem


How does your keyboard still function with the amount of drool it must be drowning in?
Better question..why don't you stay on Stormfront where no one will argue with you?
That video shows Zimmerman being 100% fine, no broken nose, no black eyes, no cut up head, no blood anywhere...your hero is a child murderer.

Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by WP4YT

 

Very good points you bring up....I have been wondering about the 3 day lapse...is it even true?

It adds more fuel to the fire if it is.

Did his mother not try to contact him from Miami and why didn't dad and girlfriend realize he didn't come home?

Does he have a history of just taking off for days doing god knows what...or did parents just not care that son didn't come home for 3 days. I would have living at the police station, pestering them to find my kid.

Anyone remember (dating myself here) back in the 70's they had those little announcements before the news?

"It's 11 o'clock, do you know where your children are?" Maybe parents need reminders again.

Here, I'll make it simple for you and link you to my post that already went over this.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by Kali74


The "Child" jumped the guy from behind and he was shot dead and there is nothing that is going to happen to the shooter. Children do not jump adults from behind. We are all better off when "Children" like this are dealt with in the harshest manner possible and in this case it was a superb outcome for society as a whole.

The "Child" took offence because someone asked him a question and when that person turned around to walk away the "Child" pounced on the victim. That it turn provoked a proper response and now the "Child" is no longer with us. I actually sleep better when I hear criminals will not be wasting tax payer money sitting in jail which is exactly where this "Child" was headed..

Maybe if the parents of this "Child" actually raised the "Child" properly we wouldn't be having this conversation...

Originally posted by TruckDriver69
reply to post by Kali74

 

The "Child" jumped the guy from behind and he was shot dead and there is nothing that is going to happen to the shooter. Children do not jump adults from behind.

Post up the proof, or are you talking out your butt?

Pathetic ...

reply to post by TruckDriver69


Somehow you know how this child was raised?

reply to post by braindeadconservatives


Witness accounts and the victim or are we just going to assume the "Child" did not jump the victim here? The "Child" should have learned manners and decorum in a civilized society early on in his life. The "Child" went for the victims gun and the "Child" lost. These are the facts as we know them. This was a victim statement told to the police or are we just assuming that the "Child" was shot for no good reason? I find that theory very laughable.

Originally posted by TruckDriver69
reply to post by braindeadconservatives

 

Witness accounts and the victim or are we just going to assume the "Child" did not jump the victim here? The "Child" should have learned manners and decorum in a civilized society early on in his life. The "Child" went for the victims gun and the "Child" lost. These are the facts as we know them. This was a victim statement told to the police or are we just assuming that the "Child" was shot for no good reason? I find that theory very laughable.

Yup, talking out you butt... Enjoy

reply to post by Kali74


Somehow you seem to know a lot about well, if this was indeed a "Child." If he was a "Child" he was a very hot tempered "Child" or are we assuming the victim in this case shot the "Child" in cold blood with no facts to back them up? The victim statement clearly says the "Child" went for his gun. Or are you the type to just take the minority point of view with no actual facts?

reply to post by braindeadconservatives


One liners are a very convincing argument. You have no intelligent case to be made about the "Child" here? I hear a lot of people defending the "Child" when the victim and witness statements clearly states the "Child" assaulted the victim and actually went for the gun. I think you tend to think out of your butt...

Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by popsmayhem

 

That video shows Zimmerman being 100% fine, no broken nose, no black eyes, no cut up head, no blood anywhere..

Take another look.
AND IF ANYONE MISSED THIS PLEASE
take a look at the thread that has been keeping this case updated
www.abovetopsecret.com...
That video has been around for a day already,
and has already been debunked.
Here you can see the BS propaganda that the MSM
is spewing again, by posting a video with the headline
*no injuries in video*, when clearly if you look at this picture,
you can see the back of his head is injured.

Here
YOU can see zimmermans nose is crooked looks broke to me
and right under the eye you can see bruising, and anyone who has ever had a black eye
can tell you it looks worse a day or two after the initial hit.

Just amazes me how the MSM works and people keeps buying into
the story they want too. That zimmerman is a racist cold blooded murderer.
Do not forget it was a rainy day, remember
that is why treyvon had his hoody on.
The blood got washed off in the rain,
The ground underneath said grass still hurts. It was raining, good luck finding blood in the grass, especially since Zimmerman got up and moved after he shot Martin in self defense,
As proof from eye witnesses.
Because, with treyvon being on top of zimmerman beating
his face in, would prove treyvon was the agressor
because treyvon was never hit by zimmerman!!
NOW WITH THE NEW statements from
Trayvon Martin's funeral director: No signs of fight

www.thegrio.com...
Not that hard to understand.....

Originally posted by TruckDriver69
reply to post by Kali74

 

Somehow you seem to know a lot about well, if this was indeed a "Child." If he was a "Child" he was a very hot tempered "Child" or are we assuming the victim in this case shot the "Child" in cold blood with no facts to back them up? The victim statement clearly says the "Child" went for his gun. Or are you the type to just take the minority point of view with no actual facts?

It is clear Zimmerman called the police

Ignored the advice of the police dispatcher not to engage Martin

Zimmerman did engage Martin

A fight started

Martin got the upper hand in the fight

Zimmerman killed Martin

That's the case

Originally posted by popsmayhem

Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by popsmayhem

 

That video shows Zimmerman being 100% fine, no broken nose, no black eyes, no cut up head, no blood anywhere...your hero is a child murderer.

Take another look.
AND IF ANYONE MISSED THIS PLEASE
take a look at the thread that has been keeping this case updated
www.abovetopsecret.com...
That video has been around for a day already,
and has already been debunked.
Here you can see the BS propaganda that the MSM
is spewing again, by posting a video with the headline
*no injuries in video*, when clearly if you look at this picture,
you can see the back of his head is injured.

Here
YOU can see zimmermans nose is crooked looks broke to me
and right under the eye you can see bruising, and anyone who has ever had a black eye
can tell you it looks worse a day or two after the initial hit.
Just amazes me how the MSM works and people keeps buying into
the story they want too. That zimmerman is a racist cold blooded murderer.
Do not forget it was a rainy day, remember
that is why treyvon had his hoody on.
The blood got washed off in the rain,
The ground underneath said grass still hurts. It was raining, good luck finding blood in the grass, especially since Zimmerman got up and moved after he shot Martin in self defense,
As proof from eye witnesses.
Because, with treyvon being on top of zimmerman beating
his face in, would prove treyvon was the agressor
because treyvon was never hit by zimmerman!!
NOW WITH THE NEW statements from
Trayvon Martin's funeral director: No signs of fight

www.thegrio.com...
Not that hard to understand.....

edit on 29-3-2012 by popsmayhem because: (no reason given)

Look at the tip of the police officers forehead, did he get hit too??? By Zimmerman???

Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by popsmayhem

 

How does your keyboard still function with the amount of drool it must be drowning in?
Better question..why don't you stay on Stormfront where no one will argue with you?
That video shows Zimmerman being 100% fine, no broken nose, no black eyes, no cut up head, no blood anywhere...your hero is a child murderer.

Really i saw the video so how are you going to see cuts on a grainy low quality video. You do realize before that video was made paramedics cleaned him up at the scene. So in your world the police lied the paramedics lied.Apparently they pretended to treat him on the scene and the blood was ketchup right? Lets also just throw out the testimony of the person that saw Treyvon beating him bad enough that he screamed he was calling the cops.Ah but he was in on it to im sure even though he didn't even know Zimmerman and identified both of them by there clothes. As i pointed out before you tend to see what you want to see why dont you look at some facts.


Now to agree with someone else if he was white he would get life but since hes Hispanic hell get off trust me the hispanic community is starting to get behind zimmerman. Since this is the other major voting block for democrats this will disappear.Watch first the feds will say we dont have jurisdiction being unable to prove hate crime. This gives the democrats a way out they go see we tried. Then the states attorneys office will again after further investigation uphold there previous decision of not enough evidence to prosecute.

Then part 3 the democrats will start with well if he wasnt carrying a gun this wouldnt have happened and once again try to get rid of carry laws.Alot of republicans will jump on board because going into an election year dont want to look like there doing nothing about the black teens death.People think dems and repubs are diffrent there not they all have 1 goal get elected.

PS if he wasnt hispanic he would have got the death penalty but as a minority hell be fine.

reply to post by braindeadconservatives


Martin started the fight, got the upper hand and then was shot in self defense. Yep, sounds about right to me. The "Child" was not the victim here. The victim lived and the criminal died. We all win.

Originally posted by TruckDriver69
reply to post by braindeadconservatives

 

Martin started the fight, got the upper hand and then was shot in self defense. Yep, sounds about right to me. The "Child" was not the victim here. The victim lived and the criminal died. We all win.

How do you know Martin started the fight?

You don't

Acting like a child and making things up will not be enough to sway a jury.

reply to post by TruckDriver69


The white guilt card? Zimmerman also claimed Martin beat him up, clearly that didn't happen either.