It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by xEphon
That's funny considering the only real reason Zimmerman is walking free right now is because he has a judge as a relative.
Which is why he walked free from his domestic violence arrest
Which is why he walked free from his battery of an officer arrest
Even the police department wanted to charge him,
But good ol DA who is pals of judge Zimmerman says "Na, not enough evidence"
Yeah. Good for our legal system.
Originally posted by xEphon
Originally posted by DavidWillts
Im just glad the media was not allowed to hijack our legal system this time and that Zimmerman walks free. If treyvaughawne just picked anyone else to assault that day maybe he would still be alive.
That's funny considering the only real reason Zimmerman is walking free right now is because he has a judge as a relative.
Which is why he walked free from his domestic violence arrest
Which is why he walked free from his battery of an officer arrest
Even the police department wanted to charge him,
But good ol DA who is pals of judge Zimmerman says "Na, not enough evidence"
The civil rights community and the liberal media live by the poetic truth that America is still a reflexively racist society, and that this remains the great barrier to black equality. But this "truth" has a lot of lie in it. America has greatly evolved since the 1960s. There are no longer any respectable advocates of racial segregation. And blacks today are nine times more likely to be killed by other blacks than by whites.So the idea that Trayvon Martin is today's Emmett Till, as the Rev. Jackson has said, suggests nothing less than a stubborn nostalgia for America's racist past. In that bygone era civil rights leaders and white liberals stood on the highest moral ground. They literally knew themselves—given their genuine longing to see racism overcome—as historically transformative people. If the world resisted them, as it surely did, it only made them larger than life.
Zimmerman also has a history of stalking suspects and of police envy. Zimmerman contacted the Sanford Police Department 46 times in the past 15 months, the agency reported today. The most frequent reason for his call – eight times – was to report a suspicious person, the agency said. “I hold law enforcement officers in the highest regard and I hope to one day become one,” Zimmerman wrote in an application to the Seminole County Sheriff’s Office citizen’s law enforcement academy. That’s a class in which citizens learn about policing and how the sheriff’s office works. He went through that program in 2009. … In 2003 he saw a 24-year-old Lake Mary man shoplift a 24-inch TV from an Albertson’s Supermarket, called the Seminole County Sheriff’s Office and followed the suspect’s car for several blocks, allowing a deputy to make an arrest. The next year, he followed a man in his vehicle for several blocks after accusing him of spitting at him, according to an incident report. The other driver accused Zimmerman of tailgating him, and was not arrested. Yes, the good people of Sanford should rest easy with Zimmerman roaming the streets. I presume the police took his gun for testing, but what’s to stop him from buying another?
Originally posted by DavidWillts
reply to post by pizzanazi75
What a retarded story. Out of the 46 calls 8 of them were for a suspicious person? So the remaining 38 were for legitimate purposes?
Originally posted by cdesigns
Zimmerman didnt know he was a Cop .......
Originally posted by Deranged74
reply to post by kimish
What about zimmermens past, connect the dots. ANYONE who would assault a cop would assault a civilianedit on 4-4-2012 by Deranged74 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by conspiracy nut
Originally posted by DavidWillts
reply to post by pizzanazi75
What a retarded story. Out of the 46 calls 8 of them were for a suspicious person? So the remaining 38 were for legitimate purposes?
this is what i heard from the info released so far. an expert was on msnbc on the martin bashir show, he had examined 7 911 calls so far. of the 7 calls 1 of them was for an open garage door one was for a dog fight, that leaves 5 calls that were for suspicious people, guess what all 5 people happened to be african american. like i said i cant wait to hear what the other 39 calls were about? i did hear that one of those other calls was about an 8 year old african american boy. i dont have a source for that.
I also heard the report about him calling on a 7-9 year old boy.
Originally posted by conspiracy nut
Originally posted by DavidWillts
reply to post by pizzanazi75
What a retarded story. Out of the 46 calls 8 of them were for a suspicious person? So the remaining 38 were for legitimate purposes?
this is what i heard from the info released so far. an expert was on msnbc on the martin bashir show, he had examined 7 911 calls so far.
Originally posted by DavidWillts
reply to post by pizzanazi75
What a retarded story. Out of the 46 calls 8 of them were for a suspicious person? So the remaining 38 were for legitimate purposes?
Originally posted by DavidWillts
Originally posted by conspiracy nut
Originally posted by DavidWillts
reply to post by pizzanazi75
What a retarded story. Out of the 46 calls 8 of them were for a suspicious person? So the remaining 38 were for legitimate purposes?
this is what i heard from the info released so far. an expert was on msnbc on the martin bashir show, he had examined 7 911 calls so far.
What sort of "expert" is needed to vaguely summarize 7 out of 8 calls to 911?
Originally posted by pizzanazi75
Originally posted by DavidWillts
reply to post by pizzanazi75
What a retarded story. Out of the 46 calls 8 of them were for a suspicious person? So the remaining 38 were for legitimate purposes?
And all 8 of those 'suspicious' people turned out to be black. Coincidence?
And just because 38 other calls were made does not make them legitimate. He called about trash in the road, a pothole, an open garage door, someone with tail lights out in his neighborhood, etc. If those type of calls are legitimate to you then I guess we disagree about why you call the police.
What is 'retarded' as you put is that you couldn't see that your self and I had to point it out to you. It shows that you don't have much use for reasoning skills or looking at all available outcomes to a situation. You just assumed all the other call were legitimate with out even knowing what they were.
Originally posted by DavidWillts
Originally posted by pizzanazi75
Originally posted by DavidWillts
reply to post by pizzanazi75
What a retarded story. Out of the 46 calls 8 of them were for a suspicious person? So the remaining 38 were for legitimate purposes?
And all 8 of those 'suspicious' people turned out to be black. Coincidence?
And just because 38 other calls were made does not make them legitimate. He called about trash in the road, a pothole, an open garage door, someone with tail lights out in his neighborhood, etc. If those type of calls are legitimate to you then I guess we disagree about why you call the police.
911 does not equal police...
What is 'retarded' as you put is that you couldn't see that your self and I had to point it out to you. It shows that you don't have much use for reasoning skills or looking at all available outcomes to a situation. You just assumed all the other call were legitimate with out even knowing what they were.
I know what they were and as fare as "reasoning skills" go you completely missed that when they said 46 calls over the last 15 months it was actually over the last 96 months.What is 'retarded' as you put is that you couldn't see that your self and I had to point it out to you.It shows that you don't have much use for reasoning skills or looking at all available outcomes to a situation.-see what i did there?
www.sanfordfl.gov...
Originally posted by DavidWillts
reply to post by pizzanazi75
So if a person makes a few pointless 911 calls in their life they automatically lose the right to defend themselves from crazed drug dealers?
So if a person makes a few pointless 911 calls in their life they automatically lose the right to defend themselves from crazed drug dealers?
And you again defend zimmerman by discounting his verified history of aggression and violence,
and slam Treyvon by slurring his name with no verifiable evidence (twitter feeds dont count) of him being a 'crazed drug dealer'...that is typical when you have no real arguments or defense. You slander and smear the victim.
Originally posted by amongus
So tired of all this. I understand what happened, but because it was an african american kid and a mexican man, it blows up into something that is just justifying Trevon's parent's attempt at a payday.
So sick of seeing all these threads about something that happens EVERY DAY in the world.