It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tri-lobe-1
reply to post by Hanslune
Howdy Hans,
Are you saying now that the thriths are maybe Phoenician.....where in that old balbeck thread you huffed and you puffed about them being roman....and any one who disagreed with you was just fringe muck.....How dare you question the old german dig.....even if it was selective and narrow in scope...
Hans....I'm very confused by time teams turn about here.....Who would of thunghed??...
Originally posted by Hanslune
Its best to pick one theory based on what information you have and then try to prove or disprove it.
The evidence for the Trils is limited so that is what you have to go with. Either the stones were Rome quarried and used for building, or Phoenicians quarried, used by them then reused by the Romans.
I'd go with the Romans for the time being but before Blackmarketeer found that DAI report which we had been looking for for some time, I had been tending away from the Romans towards the Phoenicians given there architectural style of large foundation stones.
I believe my ire was directed more at people who believed they might be placed there by aliens, the evidence for the trils is very thin, the experts vote for Roman and there isn't enough evidence for someone else doing it to raise a good alternative scenario
Could the Phoenicians have quarried those stones? Maybe, we will probably never know
Originally posted by shake101
reply to post by Vandettas
Well, your muted.
EDIT: By the way, launching a personal attack on somebody in an intelligent debate on the basis of emotion, and getting your feelings hurt is basically asking for ignorance. Adieu!edit on 28-3-2012 by shake101 because: Forgot something
Originally posted by LightAssassin
I still believe in the AA theory. Especially considering if previous advanced human civ's existed it is quite possible they had space technology.
Originally posted by Hanslune
reply to post by Logical one
That's known as the AA paradox why were these guys only interested in moving rocks around......
Originally posted by Logical one
The Ancient Astronaut theory doesn't stand up to any real scrutiny........besides if these ancient peoples had "Space technology"........then why would they only use it to build monuments?
And why is it that those ancient astronauts haven't come back to help us build.........more monuments?edit on 29-3-2012 by Logical one because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Hanslune
That's known as the AA paradox why were these guys only interested in moving rocks around......
Originally posted by Xtrozero
One other thing to think about to add to your, why only help us with large stones...If an alien race was let's say millions of years advance to us would our level of advancement today really be that much far off from 2000 years ago in their eyes? Why would they be in hiding EVER... Kind of like if they helped us in the stone age, and then thought when we became farmers, WOW we need to hide they are too far advance now...lol
Originally posted by Logical one
You also have the mystery as to why ETs had no qualms showing themselves in public in ancient times......but in modern times suddenly they have become somewhat shy of us primitive humans!
The more you examine the Ancient Alien hypoythesis the more ridiculous it gets!
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Kind of weird that they are all around us and now we have 7 billion cameras and instant communication to every part of the world and really have nothing more than what we also have for big foot.
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
There just isnt any evidence to support aliens.edit on 29-3-2012 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Tsurugi
Could the Phoenicians have quarried those stones? Maybe, we will probably never know