The MATRIX of 188 - LEY LINES of the 188 DAY Mega-Quake Cycle Discovered & linked to NEW MADRID QUAK

/popcorn.

Ok, this will at least be fun to watch for the rest of the day.

Can also confirm the Quake in Mexico, others have the info.

reply to post by free_form


That makes no sense. There is no way to detect if time is changing unless there is an external event that can be used as a clock. Then again it makes as much as ley lines.

Yep, earthquake in mexico is all over the latin news... Lol, dont tell me ATS got it semi right...

Well this 188 day theory has definitely got my attention now. I am also wondering, however, if this was just a precursor to another quake on the 22nd (the actual date reported to hit on the 188 day cycle)?

the mexico quake today 20/03/2012 could be a just sign of the bigger one to come on the 22nd

Is it plausible that the earthquake in mexico and india on opposite sides of the plate could be a forewarning for an impending larger more devastating quake to follow in the next few days?

Hahaha. Totally read this thread last week and thought it was quacky. Coincidence or prescience?

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by free_form

 

That makes no sense. There is no way to detect if time is changing unless there is an external event that can be used as a clock. Then again it makes as much as ley lines.

Time is probably not the best word to use. The vibrational energy of our planet, and all of us, is increasing in frequency. Thus, "time" is accelerating. If you look at the frequency at which significant events (large-scale disasters, wars, stock crashes, etc) occur in history, they occur much closer together and in quicker succession as time has progressed. There are several pretty good threads on this in the forum, so you can scoff at it as crazy talk or go search for them, they explain it better than I can.

Originally posted by dejavooo
the mexico quake today 20/03/2012 could be a just sign of the bigger one to come on the 22nd

edit on 20-3-2012 by dejavooo because: (no reason given)

The 22nd is the WRONG DATE. Tomorrow is the 188th day.

thread

I dont know this 188 theory but maybe it is with proximity, like around 188 day, not exactly the same number of days.

It looks like this theory is correct.

The quake in Mexico was huge.

But I think that probably a 10 quake is coming in this days.

Be prepared and remember that the mayan calendar is correct, this year is going to change the world forever.

The fact that several 7.0 + quakes occur during these 188 day cycles where "certain" quakes are used to validate this theory, makes it complete bunk. Certain quakes are cherry picked while many others are overlooked or not even discussed. The lines on the map are a joke. Earth is ROUND, not flat, so the lines on the maps are useless.

Why are all the other BIG earthquakes that occur during these 188 day cycles not even mentioned?

Originally posted by dejavooo
the mexico quake today 20/03/2012 could be a just sign of the bigger one to come on the 22nd

edit on 20-3-2012 by dejavooo because: (no reason given)

Happy Skull and Bones Day!
322

reply to post by My.mind.is.mine


its the 20th in my time zone, and the author of the video stated 22nd of march

Any specialist in statistics in the house?

What are the exact mathematical probabilities of a earthquake above 7.0 in the Richter scale to hit in any given random interval of 5 days?

For example, take the random interval between March 10 and March 14 (10, 11, 12, 13 and 14). What were the mathematical probabilities of an earthquake with magnitude above 7.0 happening in that randomly chosen interval?

Originally posted by GLontra
Any specialist in statistics in the house?

What are the exact mathematical probabilities of a earthquake above 7.0 in the Richter scale to hit in any given random interval of 5 days?

For example, take the random interval between March 10 and March 14 (10, 11, 12, 13 and 14). What were the mathematical probabilities of an earthquake with magnitude above 7.0 happening in that randomly chosen interval?

Magnitude 7.4 OAXACA, MEXICO March 20, 2012
Magnitude 6.9 OFF THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN March 14, 2012
Magnitude 6.7 VANUATU March 09, 2012
Magnitude 4.0 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, CALIFORNIA March 05, 2012
Magnitude 6.6 SOUTHEAST OF THE LOYALTY ISLANDS March 03, 2012
Magnitude 6.7 SOUTHWESTERN SIBERIA, RUSSIA February 26, 2012
Magnitude 6.0 OFF THE COAST OF OREGON February 15, 2012
Magnitude 6.4 SOLOMON ISLANDS February 14, 2012
Magnitude 5.6 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA February 13, 2012
Magnitude 6.7 NEGROS - CEBU REGION, PHILIPPINES February 06, 2012
Magnitude 7.1 VANUATU February 02, 2012
Magnitude 6.3 NEAR THE COAST OF CENTRAL PERU January 30, 2012
Magnitude 6.6 SOUTH SHETLAND ISLANDS January 15, 2012
Magnitude 7.2 OFF THE WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA January 10, 2012
Magnitude 6.6 SANTA CRUZ ISLANDS January 09, 2012
Magnitude 6.8 IZU ISLANDS, JAPAN REGION January 01, 2012
usgs.gov

About one every two weeks or so, so not such a big deal, when there's an 8 there will be something to talk about but 7.6 with no damage barely makes the nightly news

I'd like to see someone post a map of ALL quakes ever recorded onto a map! I'm sure we will see major lines without drawing them. Has anyone ever done that before? Then a map of all quakes over 7, then over 8, then over mag 9! Then we will need a map showing Quakes that DO DAMAGE or have at least killed a few people!

I'm sure that then we can lay this to bed! Either there will be clear lines of interest or there won't be. Once we have that, we can try to connect the dots by times/days/solar occurrences/sun cycle/moon cycle/ect.

That would be a massive undertaking trying to use science to figure it out.


OP....great video! I LOVE it when someone is doing something, and not just sitting in there chairs watching others do something. Then after not doing anything, just claim with there own biased belief system that the person who did something is a hoaxer!

Has the fact that the op is using 2d lines on a 3d map been addressed?
en.wikipedia.org...


Earthquakes will, and do happen outside of this cycle also.

Originally posted by PageAlaCearl

Originally posted by GLontra
Any specialist in statistics in the house?

What are the exact mathematical probabilities of a earthquake above 7.0 in the Richter scale to hit in any given random interval of 5 days?

For example, take the random interval between March 10 and March 14 (10, 11, 12, 13 and 14). What were the mathematical probabilities of an earthquake with magnitude above 7.0 happening in that randomly chosen interval?

Magnitude 7.4 OAXACA, MEXICO March 20, 2012
Magnitude 6.9 OFF THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN March 14, 2012
Magnitude 6.7 VANUATU March 09, 2012
Magnitude 4.0 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, CALIFORNIA March 05, 2012
Magnitude 6.6 SOUTHEAST OF THE LOYALTY ISLANDS March 03, 2012
Magnitude 6.7 SOUTHWESTERN SIBERIA, RUSSIA February 26, 2012
Magnitude 6.0 OFF THE COAST OF OREGON February 15, 2012
Magnitude 6.4 SOLOMON ISLANDS February 14, 2012
Magnitude 5.6 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA February 13, 2012
Magnitude 6.7 NEGROS - CEBU REGION, PHILIPPINES February 06, 2012
Magnitude 7.1 VANUATU February 02, 2012
Magnitude 6.3 NEAR THE COAST OF CENTRAL PERU January 30, 2012
Magnitude 6.6 SOUTH SHETLAND ISLANDS January 15, 2012
Magnitude 7.2 OFF THE WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA January 10, 2012
Magnitude 6.6 SANTA CRUZ ISLANDS January 09, 2012
Magnitude 6.8 IZU ISLANDS, JAPAN REGION January 01, 2012
usgs.gov

About one every two weeks or so, so not such a big deal, when there's an 8 there will be something to talk about but 7.6 with no damage barely makes the nightly news

edit on 20-3-2012 by PageAlaCearl because: (no reason given)

I see a lot of quakes BELLOW 7.0 in that list.

BELLOW.

6.9 is NOT above 7.0

One more interesting detail: at the time when the quake hit, it was already March 21 in China, Bangladesh, Japan and lots of other countries...