The MATRIX of 188 - LEY LINES of the 188 DAY Mega-Quake Cycle Discovered & linked to NEW MADRID QUAK

Ok look sacred geometry is very important to us all so please check these theories out on a spherical map of the earth before just connecting dots. The line you draw from Christ Church to Chile is in fact smaller than the line from Japan to Christ Church. Just plot the paths on google earth.

If you want to receive a nobel prize you might have to actually get up out of your chair.

I agree the 188 cycle is very interesting but this thread is far from an authority on the matter.

What I think needs to be done is to calculate the time in hours between the quakes, using GMT or something similar, then get a margin of error, and see how it fits together.

Also, sure, the OTHER quakes not fitting doesn't mean a dang thing right now. IF (and it seems that it may well be) there is a 188 day cycle (or maybe 4,500 hour ?) and that is a starting point. remove those from the list, and see if any new patterns may arise, maybe there are 5 other cycles, perhaps 24 days, and a 756 day, etc) and maybe when they align they may have bigger ones. Perhaps looking deeper, there might actually be a 282 day and a 188 day that explains why certain ones are bigger. This may well be a harder challenge than the ancients (ie, some dead pope) that figured how to accommodate the damned leap year. Hell, the whole 188 day thing might better compared to lunar months or something else! The 188 day cycle may still need tweaking, but think of Wagner when he found continental drift, but couldn't explain it, and how after that did it actually get taught in colleges, let along elementary school? Maybe it will go down as being 4567 hour cycles, and will be called the '188 day oscillation' even though it isn't 188 days. (Like how the Cincinnati airport is in KY, the Dayton airport is in Vandaila, etc)

It's quite a coincidence. I'll be interested if any earthquakes shake us up tomorrow. The big day. Now when we mention "the big one". Don't we mean earthquakes that hit population centers that cause death and destruction?

It's sort of like the ideology of a tree falling in the forest. If no one is around does it make a sound? Well yes, but it doesn't matter to us. We weren't around to hear it. Earthquakes that are large that hit in remote areas, are they to be considered one of the "big ones"? Or do we mean earthquakes that have an effect on large population centers?

Just a thought.

Well, If you draw a horizontal line from the place the earthquake was, it seems to be crossing the other lines perfectly... coincidence?

Wow. Maybe I should rethink my last post. This is kinda creepy. I wish there was a definite way to predict these things. I would love to move off of the New Madrid fault, but what place is actually completely safe? Earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, floods....seems like Mother Nature is having a field day with us lately.

I am of the thinking that Mother Earth is as alive, living, and breathing as we are. I also believe that the earth has a collective consciousness. Our actions and intentions will build to a point - where we are the target for extinction. In the end, she decides and if she wanted she could do us in a dozen different ways.

So be happy and positive. Don't feed the machine.

Pretty good thread here. I immediately recalled this thread when I heard the news about Mexico. This and the Jakius Fogg thread about the Japan earthquake are the best I've seen in all my years at ATS. We see so many duds and charlatans here that you have to look at any prediction with a healthy dose of skepticism and discernment.

The Jakius thread stood out to me for a reason I can't quite quantify but I guess it has to do with a more indivivual intuitive/paranormal/ESP type of prediction. This one stands out for a totally different reason. The fact that a discernible pattern is involved is intriguing.

After going through the old Jakius thread I see he first noticed his prediction came true when what we now know were fore shocks of the 8.8 in Japan. I hate (and often love) how many different threads get created so I've kinda lost track of all of the ones about today's event, but the one video with the cheesy animation and classical music proposed that the pattern went mega-quake, 188 days ,7.5 > ,188 days, and then meg-quake. We would be at the mega quake point right now in the pattern, and given what happened in Japan, I don't think we can say we are out of the danger zone if this hypothesis is correct.

Science can say where earthquakes will occur pretty well. There is a pretty decent consensus of what potential energy release is possible. But as to timing science's best guesses are in terms of decades if not centuries. If a bigger event happens within the next week I'd say we have something worthy of much further study here.

As much as I love hanging out in Global Meltdown and Political forums threads like this are why I've been at ATS so long.

For all of us that really want to believe this seemingly extraordinary piece of predicting, you should go on over to the most recent page of quake watch and examine the graphs that Puterman so kindly to put together, and really shine a little light on the claims of a long term pattern.

Believe me....I really was very interested and wanted to believe this trippindicular geometry earthquake thingy.

Let me know what some of you think of the debunkage!!

www.abovetopsecret.com...

The video and thread made for a great read. This is something to keep an eye on. Thanks for sharing!!

This theory of 188 days is intriguing and all, but this year is a leap year. So wouldn't the next big earthquake therefore happen on the 21st of March?
Just asking.

reply to post by radpetey


Thanks radpety. Since that was not a finished job last night here is the completed listing.

First of all the theory states that major earthquakes happen every 188 days +/- 15 days which is a very large margin (more of that in a minute) and that this pattern holds good back to 1800 and beyond.

I don’t have the intention of going back that far but I will take the figures back to 1900 and see what I find.

There seem to be some big problems with the dates and thus....

In my opinion, given the number of large quakes @ ~16 a year this level of hits does NOT prove the theory.

Full listing in the source post


reply to post by NoNameBrand

Omg.....Thats.......Thats....another YouTube vid with absolutely zero explanation of what it's about.

That simply has to be the quote of the day!!

reply to post by Willease


I make it the 20th

See my list in the referenced post.

reply to post by PageAlaCearl
Then there is this image which looks surprisingly whose central pattern looks surprisingly like that of the map. this came from The Wave of Love a video on youtube. I think if this were superimposed within a globe there might be a correlation as well. Haven't set up an image host so just go to the 00:56 mark and pause with the space bar.

The Wave of Love Vid

Unless they are created by mankind, Mother Nature probably does not work in 'days' of 24hours. If we are saying they are created by mankind (and the govenor of Chile accused the USA of creating the one there), then we need some evidence from other sources like HAARP etc

The time between these eqs IS rather strange, but I am still not sure that it cannot be explained within the bounds of the monthly maximums which are generally around M7.3 in the last couple of years.

Unfortunately we again hit the problem of "how many coincidences mean anything" ?

reply to post by free_form

Time is probably not the best word to use. The vibrational energy of our planet, and all of us, is increasing in frequency. Thus, "time" is accelerating. If you look at the frequency at which significant events (large-scale disasters, wars, stock crashes, etc) occur in history, they occur much closer together and in quicker succession as time has progressed. There are several pretty good threads on this in the forum, so you can scoff at it as crazy talk or go search for them, they explain it better than I can.

Time is not changing. The claim is that the rate at which events are happening is changing.

This claim of a vibrational energy of the planet is wrong. No once can point to anything at all to substantiate that claim.

Disasters are not more common. What is larger is the number of people involved because the population is increasing rapidly. Wars are not more common. Stock crashes are not more common.

What seems to fairly clear from all of the threads is that the individuals posting are more aware of events. They themselves are taking the time to look at current events.

reply to post by GLontra


I already posted this in multiple threads. I believe it is 0.52. I'll check again.

Well at least we wont have long to wait to find out.This land has enough troubles already!

Please understand you are living in a matrix.

Is it too difficult to understand this?