The Apollo 11 Moon Landing Site --Now Seen in Unprecedented Detail

Originally posted by Lord Jules
reply to post by paradox

 

lroc.sese.asu.edu...

this is the picture i'm talking about. It looks like a smudge, nothing near a rover. It looks more like a footprint actually than a rover. I dont see how this is any different from the countless threads saying how a smudge looks like a moon base. Looks like nasa just picked a smudge and called it a rover before the internet community could call it a base. Still looks like a smudge.

hey Jules,
I told these NASA worshipers the samething about another one of a picture was more like specs of cottage cheese on a blemished face or a adolecents's cave drawing. They didn't like it at all.
They must have some 8d glasses or something they wear when they look at the photos. A bunch of these guys got so peeved that they were wanting to punch people and silly stuff like that. It was like the dudes from the Big Bang show wanting to get in a brawl at a Trecky convention, LOL

Originally posted by paradox
reply to post by Lord Jules

 

Put a 5' tall flag in your front yard and then take a picture from 13 miles up.

Tell me how that goes for you.

And no, those are rover tracks.

Are some of the newest images not supposedly 5 meter resolution or better? I would think someone could zoom in on the area in question to get a pretty good image of anything left by the astronauts. That should settle things once and for all.

i love aliens and all that sh!t.

reply to post by longjohnbritches


*Sigh*

Read more carefully, in-thread.

The photo that "Lord Jules" posted is not of an Apollo artifact.

Deny Ignorance! (Used to be the ATS motto....wonder where it went??)

We did go to the moon, but we were kicked off. I worked for nasa for many years. Never a straight answer is correct

Originally posted by wmd_2008

Originally posted by syrinx high priest
you could take a hoaxer to the moon, push his nose onto the apollo artifacts, and he would say

"fake"

just a huge waste of time

I would like to pay for their flights to see them on the condition it's one way

edit on 15-3-2012 by wmd_2008 because: (no reason given)

This is classic comedy.
First and formost. Even if some person did go to the moon, then nobody I mean nobody has been back since what, 1973 or so. How the hell would ya get those Hoaxers up dare.
I understand nasa has even lost the recipe for the Saturn 5 and the lunar landers. And with all the time and money NASA only got a dozen or so folks up there,if it's true.
So how the heck you gonna get millions of hoaxers up there to see those FAMOUS
foot prints anyhow??????? These photos don't hack it.
Oh BTW x pres DUBYA said the USA would have new boot prints up there in 2015.
Looks like he beat you guys to the comedy.
later dudes

Where did everyone go? Maybe to scrutinize high res images of the lunar landing sites? I thought it was a good point. NASA is either lying about the resolution of their imaging equipment or that they landed on the moon, simple as that!

Either way, they are lying if the flag cannot be seen on the images!

Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by longjohnbritches

 

*Sigh*

Read more carefully, in-thread.

The photo that "Lord Jules" posted is not of an Apollo artifact.

Deny Ignorance! (Used to be the ATS motto....wonder where it went??)

Duh! thats like Sigh right?
I was talking about the pictures I disagreed with on another thread.
Itn't there an ATS thingy that says don't jump on another members post unless you read it?

reply to post by ajay59


Incorrect:

Either way, they are lying if the flag cannot be seen on the images!

We are looking down from directly overhead the landing sites. The flags are a piece of cloth, thin fabric. How would it be seen edge-on, from Lunar orbit??

That is beyond silly.....and there is some thought that the flags may have disintegrated by now, in any case. The poles and horizontal supporting rods will still be there, however. Aluminum tubes, nor more than 3/4 inches to one inch in diameter.

Resolution of the LRO Camera is not that good.

reply to post by bicnarok


Best Hoax pics so far, i wonder if they where made in the same studio as the old ones.

i rented a documentary on telus cable about the moonlanding beign fake and actually showed the how they did it, this was about 2-3 years ago so i cant remember any of it, but left me with the conclusion of it being fake, because of the flag blowign around and how could they go into space if they never been there before but i dont know much maybe they sent probes or something check out the weather and envirement details, W/E

Conclusion: government has never been good, government is bad.

Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by ajay59

 

Incorrect:

Either way, they are lying if the flag cannot be seen on the images!

We are looking down from directly overhead the landing sites. The flags are a piece of cloth, thin fabric. How would it be seen edge-on, from Lunar orbit??

That is beyond silly.....and there is some thought that the flags may have disintegrated by now, in any case. The poles and horizontal supporting rods will still be there, however. Aluminum tubes, nor more than 3/4 inches to one inch in diameter.

Resolution of the LRO Camera is not that good.

Extreeaamly weak, next!

reply to post by CPeternell

I worked for nasa for many years.

Your claim of being a NASA employee was exposed as a lie in your thread:

A U.F.O. Factory on Mars?

Making you a 'poseur'??

reply to post by ajay59


Whaddya mean, "weak?

Look up the specs on the flags and the poles they were mounted on.

Now, tell us: What would a vertical pole stuck into the Lunar surface look like from directly overhead??

The rod that extends out horizontally from the vertical pole is about 3/4 inch in diameter. Just how can a camera with no more than 0.5 meters....METERS!... resolution per pixel see a 3/4 inch-wide object?

Use some common sense.

Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by ajay59

 

Incorrect:

Either way, they are lying if the flag cannot be seen on the images!

That is beyond silly.....and there is some thought that the flags may have disintegrated by now, in any case.

This is pure conjecture on your part.The Flag is a revered American symbol.
If NASA put a flag there that would rot then SHAME on themshame on you for worshiping them.
Otherwise it should cast a very large shadow. Very large if the angle of the sun is right.
Always excuses, always.

reply to post by ready4heaven


You were seeing a crap piece of junk film "documentary" if it "convinced" you.

Might want to do some better research. And, go back and look at the first page of this thread, at the photos.

because of the flag blowign around and how could they go into space if they never been there before...

NO, the flag never was "blowing around". It moved when it was touched. That is only time.

And, the other part? I think that is not even worthy of a response.....

reply to post by ajay59


The High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) will photograph hundreds of targeted swaths of Mars' surface in unprecedented detail.

HiRISE operates in visible wavelengths, the same as human eyes, but with a telescopic lens that will produce images at resolutions never before seen in planetary exploration missions. These high resolution images will enable scientists to resolve 1-meter (about 3-foot) sized objects on Mars and to study the morphology (surface structure) in a much morewww.nasa.gov... comprehensive manner than ever before.

It seems the image resolution is supposedly greater than I remembered. If we were on the moon, the evidense should be clearly visible on the images!

reply to post by ajay59


HiRISE resolution advertised at about ONE meter.

Things smaller than one meter will not resolve.

LRO Camera is a bit better, and depends on height (distance). As this thread's Opening Post noted, the satellite was lowered to only 15 miles high, temporarily, for the best resolution possible with that equipment.

Here are the LRO details:

The two narrow angle cameras provide extreme closeup images of the lunar surface with a spatial resolution of 0.5 meters (1.6 ft) per pixel over a swath that is 5 kilometers (3.1 mi) wide.

www.msss.com...

reply to post by longjohnbritches


Here is the 'very large' shadow cast by the flag



Of course this will not be good enough for you, so you will go on to make another excuse. Just like all deluded people do when denying reality.

To all of you "professional debunkers" out there, you may run along and collect your paychecks. We will tell your masters that you attempted to do your best, however it just wasn't good enough!