It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dashdespatch
reply to post by mikefortson
if cameras were worthless at night how come we have pictures of the flares?
if cameras were worthless at night how come we have pictures of the flares?
Originally posted by StratosFear
reply to post by mikefortson
I cant imagine how cool that thing must have looked. I have always wondered though, the V-shape craft was suppossidly following an interstate right? Well where would something like that disappear to? I mean did someone witness it shooting off into infinity at some point or did it just vanish? Or did it make it`s way into a restricted military area?
Originally posted by LoveisanArt
snip
Laugh all ya want ... snip
First eventThere are few known images of the Prescott/Dewey lights. Television station KSAZ reported that an individual named Richard Curtis recorded a detailed video that purportedly showed the outline of a space craft, but that the video had been lost. The only other known video is of poor quality and shows a group of lights with no craft visible.
Cognitech, an independent video laboratory, superimposed video imagery taken of the Phoenix Lights onto video imagery it shot during daytime from the same location. In the composite image, the lights are seen to extinguish at the moment they reach the Estrella mountain range, which is visible in the daytime, but invisible in the footage shot at night. A broadcast by local Fox Broadcasting Company affiliate KSAZ-TV claimed to have performed a similar test that showed the lights were in front of the mountain range and suggested that the Cognitech data might have been altered. Dr. Paul Scowen, visiting professor of Astronomy at Arizona State University, performed a third analysis using daytime imagery overlaid with video shot of the lights and his findings were consistent with Cognitech. The Phoenix New Times subsequently reported the television station had simply overlaid two video tracks on a video editing machine without using a computer to match the zoom and scale of the two images.
Originally posted by The Shrike
Originally posted by LoveisanArt
snip
Laugh all ya want ... snip
Good suggestion! and a har har!
Originally posted by ProfessorT
I'm not sure why every time this case is discussed people always mention a formation of planes. If it was a formation of planes it would have had to have been a pretty massive exercise. Witness reports suggest the object was silent and blocked out other objects which suggests to me this was not a formation of planes. Simply put, we still don't know what was in the skies in Phoenix that day only those who witnessed it do.
Originally posted by danaBLAF
Originally posted by ProfessorT
I'm not sure why every time this case is discussed people always mention a formation of planes. If it was a formation of planes it would have had to have been a pretty massive exercise. Witness reports suggest the object was silent and blocked out other objects which suggests to me this was not a formation of planes. Simply put, we still don't know what was in the skies in Phoenix that day only those who witnessed it do.
There were witnesses that also said they could see stars in a distorted way, there were also witness that said it was planes.
When it comes down to it believe it or not, people WANT to make something seem abnormal when its actually isnt.
If you ever heard of the hudson valley sightings its the same situation as Phoenix lights. People claimed it was 1 solid triangle for years, but every vid is planes in formation. Same with he Phoenix lights video, doesnt look like a solid object looks like planes. If I'm not mistaken the guy that recorded the 9pm triangle said it looked like planes.
Which is more likely, planes flying in formation being misperceived or a Alien triangle flying over a city?edit on 17-3-2012 by danaBLAF because: (no reason given)edit on 17-3-2012 by danaBLAF because: (no reason given)