It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by The Shrike
reply to post by mikefortson
Let's get some facts straight here and a clear mind while doing so.
1. It's NOT the Phoenix "lights", it's the Phoenix Flares!
2. The first event was of a poorly constructed triangle composed of jets that wandered in and out of the formation and this is what the grainy video shows. Anything else is wishful thinking.
3. NO ONE in Phoenix proper looked up and saw anything but a beautiful star-filled sky.
4. Because the military flares were dropped behind the mountains and this is supported by the nighttime video(s)taken from the opposite hills overlooking Phoenix and supported with daylight video from same location.
5. At least one video shows a military plane with a strobe in the same scene with the flare formation.
This event is just as bad as Roswell where no UFO crashed but the truth doesn't sell, fantasy does. Sad state of affairs. Belief wins over reason!
edit on 13-3-2012 by The Shrike because: To correct reply.edit on 13-3-2012 by The Shrike because: To correct reply.edit on 13-3-2012 by The Shrike because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 8thwonder
Originally posted by The Shrike
snip
"NO ONE" in Phoenix?!?
I guess 1000s of eyewitnesses including the ex-Governor Fife Symington must have been dreaming..
Originally posted by The Shrike
reply to post by mikefortson
Let's get some facts straight here and a clear mind while doing so.
1. It's NOT the Phoenix "lights", it's the Phoenix Flares!
2. The first event was of a poorly constructed triangle composed of jets that wandered in and out of the formation and this is what the grainy video shows. Anything else is wishful thinking.
3. NO ONE in Phoenix proper looked up and saw anything but a beautiful star-filled sky.
4. Because the military flares were dropped behind the mountains and this is supported by the nighttime video(s)taken from the opposite hills overlooking Phoenix and supported with daylight video from same location.
5. At least one video shows a military plane with a strobe in the same scene with the flare formation.
This event is just as bad as Roswell where no UFO crashed but the truth doesn't sell, fantasy does. Sad state of affairs. Belief wins over reason!
edit on 13-3-2012 by The Shrike because: To correct reply.edit on 13-3-2012 by The Shrike because: To correct reply.edit on 13-3-2012 by The Shrike because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by The Shrike
Originally posted by 8thwonder
Originally posted by The Shrike
snip
"NO ONE" in Phoenix?!?
I guess 1000s of eyewitnesses including the ex-Governor Fife Symington must have been dreaming..
I still say no one. The flares were not dropped OVER Phoenix proper. Only the residents on the hills opposite the mountains saw anything. How can you see something overhead if the activity was not taking place overhead?
The daylight video synchronized with the nighttime video proves it. Sorry, 1000s of eyewitnesses doesn't jive. Find a Phoenix resident who looked up and saw the flares. I bet you can't.
A neighbor moved to Phoenix and when I asked him what he saw he said he didn't see anything as there was no alarm in the streets, no huge amounts of people spilling out into the streets, it was the next day when word got around about the event.edit on 13-3-2012 by The Shrike because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by thesearchfortruth
reply to post by The Shrike
The Shrike, you may be right, but...
What do you say about the hundreds of people who described a silent boomerang shaped solid object blocking out stars as it passed slowly over the sky?
What do you say about the governor of Phoenix, Fife Symington who says he saw a giant craft that blocked the stars out as it passed? Symington was a pilot I might add...
How do you explain these testimonies?
(welcome to ATS Mike... )edit on 13-3-2012 by thesearchfortruth because: he added welcome
Originally posted by thesearchfortruth
reply to post by The Shrike
The Shrike, you may be right, but...
What do you say about the hundreds of people who described a silent boomerang shaped solid object blocking out stars as it passed slowly over the sky?
What do you say about the governor of Phoenix, Fife Symington who says he saw a giant craft that blocked the stars out as it passed? Symington was a pilot I might add...
How do you explain these testimonies?
(welcome to ATS Mike... )edit on 13-3-2012 by thesearchfortruth because: he added welcome
Originally posted by Orkojoker
Originally posted by thesearchfortruth
reply to post by The Shrike
The Shrike, you may be right, but...
What do you say about the hundreds of people who described a silent boomerang shaped solid object blocking out stars as it passed slowly over the sky?
What do you say about the governor of Phoenix, Fife Symington who says he saw a giant craft that blocked the stars out as it passed? Symington was a pilot I might add...
How do you explain these testimonies?
(welcome to ATS Mike... )edit on 13-3-2012 by thesearchfortruth because: he added welcome
Shrike explains them in a rather lame yet overconfident fashion. Typical. Any sighting can be prosaically explained if you just toss out the details that don't fit your explanation.edit on 13-3-2012 by Orkojoker because: editing purposes
Originally posted by Human_Alien
Not sure who the OP is or what position he takes but I doubt very much I will ever budge from my position about this event.
Originally posted by The Shrike
Originally posted by Orkojoker
Originally posted by thesearchfortruth
reply to post by The Shrike
The Shrike, you may be right, but...
What do you say about the hundreds of people who described a silent boomerang shaped solid object blocking out stars as it passed slowly over the sky?
What do you say about the governor of Phoenix, Fife Symington who says he saw a giant craft that blocked the stars out as it passed? Symington was a pilot I might add...
How do you explain these testimonies?
(welcome to ATS Mike... )edit on 13-3-2012 by thesearchfortruth because: he added welcome
Shrike explains them in a rather lame yet overconfident fashion. Typical. Any sighting can be prosaically explained if you just toss out the details that don't fit your explanation.edit on 13-3-2012 by Orkojoker because: editing purposes
Do the research, it'll lead you to the same conclusion. But it's okay that you badmouthed me, it's expected.