It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by adigregorio
So their bandwagon would be moot, since it HAS to be seperate from the states descisions. If they want to join with the state (non-profitness) then they must either jump off of the religion claim, or start offering the option to pop pills. (Also, telling them to offer that option is not forcing their workers to USE that option.)
If a worker was to use that option, well that takes us to confessional does it not? Something between the sinner and their God, not us and our morals.
Originally posted by adigregorio
Originally posted by seabag
Should taxpayers fund abortion and contraception? Should we be spending money on personal responsibility issues while trillions in debt. Do you care?
We do now, just not for churches. Or can I not get free rubbers in high school? What about free BC pills from planned parenthood? We do know that free is never really "free"? Someone pays for those raincoats and pez.
As for me caring, not really a point. What I mean is, what does my caring matter? It mattered in my faulty reasoning in my first post, because of the whole human flaw (also mentioned in said post) Here, well my caring is of little consequence.
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by sarra1833
I think people as a whole should learn to simply mind their own and not mind everyone else's on personal private matters such as to birth control or not, to pro life or pro choice and /especially/ who one happens to fall in love with.
The entire world has issues much greater than these silly things to worry on, truly.
It most certainly is my business when my healthcare is more expensive so that others can have abortions and contraceptives provided to them.
Not to mention the objection by Christian hospitals who are going to be forced to provide services that go against their views and the protections they have been afforded.
I thought we had a free market? Why should a private hospital be forced to provide a service they don’t want to provide?
Would it be OK if the government mandated that all restaurants in the US must provide tofu simply because a few Americans like it?
edit on 11-3-2012 by seabag because: (no reason given)
No comment OPer?
Avoiding my comments, or did you just miss my large post?
So their bandwagon would be moot, since it HAS to be seperate from the states descisions. If they want to join with the state (non-profitness) then they must either jump off of the religion claim, or start offering the option to pop pills. (Also, telling them to offer that option is not forcing their workers to USE that option.)
As for me caring, not really a point. What I mean is, what does my caring matter? It mattered in my faulty reasoning in my first post, because of the whole human flaw (also mentioned in said post) Here, well my caring is of little consequence.
Originally posted by seabag
Do you believe taxpayers should be funding nationalized healthcare and abortions/contraceptives especially at a time when our nation is trillions in debt?
Does this issue matter to you at all? Should it?
Will your vote be strictly about the economy and jobs or will this issue play a role in your decision making process this November?
Doesn't the issue of life and death extend far beyond the realm of religious ideology?
He goes on to warn Planned Parenthood and President Obama: “You better knock us out right now” because “I can promise you - Here comes the Catholic Church ... you’ve awakened a sleeping giant.”
“Priests and bishops that have in the past been content to remain quiet are no longer so. ... The Truth is being rained down everywhere. ... Here comes the Catholic Church.”
We either fund abortion and contraceptives now
or
Welfare and prision care later.
Just a little Logic is needed.
Originally posted by seabag
Don’t flatter yourself. I was responding to other posts…
Originally posted by seabag
Originally posted by adigregorio
So their bandwagon would be moot, since it HAS to be seperate from the states descisions. If they want to join with the state (non-profitness) then they must either jump off of the religion claim, or start offering the option to pop pills. (Also, telling them to offer that option is not forcing their workers to USE that option.)
1)You may be right…if they agree to take federal money or tax breaks they would in essence be relinquishing some rights.
2)I’d like to claim that I am a Christian activist who knows the ins and outs of these issues but I’m not. My main beef is that I don’t want Obamacare. I REALLY don’t want Obamacare to include abortion and contraception coverage for ANYONE because I'm pro-life and don't think the government should be holding people's hands.
Originally posted by seabag
The reason I asked if you cared is because if a person does care about this issue it may affect the way they vote this year…that’s all. Some people couldn’t care less about abortion (the intentional destruction of life for selfish reasons) and don’t care about a candidates position on the matter.
I can see why they would be against their cult members aborting them or using contraception. That would leave them with less children around them.
I certainly would not listen to anything a catholic priest says ESPECIALLY when it involves CHILDREN...
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by HangTheTraitors
I can see why they would be against their cult members aborting them or using contraception. That would leave them with less children around them.
I certainly would not listen to anything a catholic priest says ESPECIALLY when it involves CHILDREN...
Did you watch the video? NO?
He wasn’t talking about opening a day care or a human trafficking market, sir! He was discussing the abortion issue and the millions of innocent lives lost each year.
Calm down!
Originally posted by KeliOnyx
First the Catholic church has it's own problems to deal with in this country and should stay out of the political discourse. As for threats to Obama's re-election bid, it is really a joke on it's own as the Church has been in a continual decline in membership in the wake of child abuse and other scandals that do not get reported.
They may have had a legitimate complaint on the insurance mandate. A mandate that a number of states already require that went without comment. Add to this the ignorant right trying to boil this down to using condoms. Prescribed birth control is used for women's health reasons besides birth control. So in effect the church is mandating women to risk severe consequences to their health. At the very least prescribed contraception should be treated as any other prescription.
The other thing people keep failing to understand here is that it is already and has been long established that the Government does have the ability to curtail religious practices it deems against the public good. And they do this for good reason. Luckily the situations where the need to do so have been far and few between they do in fact happen. It is just a fact of society that we have to deal with the two are not always compatible.
He was talking about his and the churches opposition to ABORTION AND CONTRACEPTION and CHILDREN and them not having a choice.
Did YOU even watch the video? It CLEARLY involves CHILDREN!!
(*SIGH* Goes to show how BLIND and MINDLESS cult members really that they now cannot even see videos for what they are. SIGH!!!)