Finally! - A REAL Lunar Anomaly?

reply to post by Anunaki10


I remember hearing and reading about that.

Plenty of evidence from astronauts, pilots, and military officials who have in the past commented on sightings and they are always shot down by someone else...oh it just couldn't be.

It would most certainly have to be other life forms in this vast Universe/Mutliverse... I mean...COME ON!

Are we the only ones who can make it to the Moon? I doubt it... seems very naive to think so imo. But hey... Its just that..my opinion.

In case anyone is still interested, Here is the original image from Kaguya. The resolution obtained by the terrain camera was not comparable to that of the LROC (10m vs. 0.5m).


However, when over zoomed, the source of the "anomaly" becomes readily apparent. An important clue is in the way it suddenly appears (along with all the other ones in that particular area) at a particular level of zoom. Also, as has been pointed out, the "anomaly" is aligned with the pixel grid of the original.


The original image used does not contain enough information to resolve anything at that scale. Google "invents" it. Once again, don't use Google Moon for research.

Kaguya source

reply to post by Anunaki10


Why insert garbage into a perfectly good thread?

Lunar surface 1969, Neil Armstrong >>God, what is that out there?... What the h... is that???... But this is unbelievable!...

Originally posted by MamaJ
I remember hearing and reading about that.

www.abovetopsecret.com... And from Page 9 i presented the video footage where Neil Armstrong said >>God, what is that out there?... What the h... is that???... But this is unbelievable!...

Does this not resemble pacman? I don't see why a joke about pacman being on the moon after seeing this picture is considered offtopic.
Lighten up folks, it's only the internet

reply to post by Anunaki10


Alex Collier Need I say more

Originally posted by eriktheawful
This thread's topic is very specific: It's a question about a picture of a specific area of the moon, and the source of said picture. The overall topic of this thread is NOT to prove whether or not alien bases, human bases actually exist on the entire moon.

The title of this thread is "Finally! - A REAL Lunar Anomaly?", which means it's about ANY Lunar Anomaly ANYWHERE on the Moon, so you better get used to it, wether you like it or not...

Again: THIS thread is about a SPECIFIC place on the moon. Not the ENTIRE moon.

Let me repeat it to you, no matter how much you hate it, the title of this thread is "Finally! - A REAL Lunar Anomaly?", which means it's about ANY Lunar Anomaly ANYWHERE on the Moon, so you better get used to it, wether you like it or not...

Nor is this thread for trying to prove the existence of aliens anywhere.

There have been mentioned "Alien bases", "Dome cities", and that is ALLOWED, because this is about ANOMALIES ANYWHERE on the Moon, and guess what, Different kind of aliens species reportedly had bases on the Moon, yeah, different Extraterrestrial species such as from Rigel, Betelguese, the Barnard Star, and a planet orbiting Sirius, most known as “grays” but not all (some are blue, orange or even pale white), even some Reptilian beings were reportedly on the Moon, >>BOO!

Originally posted by XtraTL
Come on people! If you call yourself an expert and say you have been doing this for many years, be prepared to back up your claims with detailed evidence.

As far as I can tell, the OP did not do a single one of the following:

1) Compare the image with original source material.

2) Understand the technology used to produce the images you are looking at, including digital compression.

3) Provide details of the size of the object.

4) Do analysis, such as constructing a 3D model.

5) Obtain data from an alternative source.

6) Hesitate to jump to conclusions.

Once again, we are asked to believe a story based on pixelated data below the limits of resolution after image compression from a source not designed for scientific analysis. This just gets tired.

Here is a simple guide to doing research:

* Understand and check your data sources (scale, resolution, errors, format, limitations, provenance, reliability, repeatability all being understood)

* Make very conservative guesses and rule out only those that you can be absolutely sure are not correct

* Find a way to independently confirm your analysis/findings and present it for scrutiny by other experts

* Assume that you have made an error and actively look for it

* Make sure you respect the laws of evidence -- extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence

The biggest problems on ATS are inability to distinguish conjecture from evidence, to discern reliable sources of information from unreliable sources and a lack of understanding about science.

edit on 6-3-2012 by XtraTL because: Added checklist

My opinion is that this is sound advice for anyone interested...
Ofcourse the enhanced bulbous lunar shapes will continue to show up in future threads. When it does will the next poster go about it a little differently??.

Originally posted by wmd_2008
Alex Collier

Need I say more

Yeah, i also think Alex Collier is a serious dude who seems to have lots of "Insider knowledge", but he is also entertaining, do doubt about that, sometimes he does say a little joke or funny thing and then he laugh and the audience who listen to him also laugh as well, but it's only sometimes that Alex Collier says a little joke or funny thing, only sometimes. All in all Alex Collier is serious when he present his stuffs, and i think he really is serious about the stuffs he is presenting, for example in this conference Alex Collier explain that the quiet science of archeology has and will discover more and more of ancient history, including ancient Extraterrestrial civilizations, he says the Andromedans told him that there is going to be aknowledgement of a temple complex that belong to ancient Lemuria that is apparently still intact lying approximately 150 miles southwest of Easter Island, Alex Collier says he is told it's huge, he also says he have been told that the Russians already know it's there, that they have photographed it and exployed it in many submarines. And when Alex Collier present things like that, then i think >Wow, ancient temple complex at the buttom of the ocean 150 miles southwest of Easter Island

Originally posted by ProudBird
That ^ ^ ^ is fake, and this is something told to you before.

Nope, guess what, it's NOT fake, this is Armstrong's voice >>God, what is that out there?... What the h... is that???... But this is unbelievable!...

So it's a resolution anomaly, it does funny things to square pixels imaging organic nature. I could have told you on page one it is a terrain map and the photographic resolution is 10-meters/pixel, LRO has imaged under .5 meters per pixel recently as it has lowered its orbital ellipse. But even at that one has to consider the speed that the camera is traversing the ground, motion distortion is impossible to fully get rid of, its why several passes are merged together and final images take a while to go public.

Still, 25 km high at nearly 6,000 mph the ground at one meter is going to give you hundredths of a second to image it, and crap does happen.

Unfortunately, It's nothing but pixel errors in the Satellite image. However, I am still convinced that alot is going on up there, but more likely on the dark side of the Moon. ~SheopleNation

reply to post by SheopleNation

.....but more likely on the dark side of the Moon.

So, "something" goes on all hemispheres of the Moon?

Because, at any given place, it is "dark" for about two weeks at a time....then it is "light" for about two weeks...then, the cycle repeats.

So, it is even "dark" on the hemisphere that faces Earth....for about two weeks, every month.

Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by Anunaki10

 

Why insert garbage into a perfectly good thread?

Lunar surface 1969, Neil Armstrong >>God, what is that out there?... What the h... is that???... But this is unbelievable!...

Here's a better image of that crater, what ever was in there is gone now.....

" target='_blank' class='tabOff'/>

reply to post by NurzeChris

.....what ever was in there is gone now.....

What was "in there" were a bunch of pixels, from a different image with lower resolution.

This is pretty clear, as pointed out by some other members.

Originally posted by The Shrike
This member, Anunaki10, doesn't seem to be able to express his personal thoughts but uses tons of readily-available data that is just downright questionable but he doesn't seem to be able to separate fact from fiction so he throws in everything including the kitchen sink.

Well well well, look what we got here, if it isn't the "shrinking" 'Shrike' TACKLED by me
www.abovetopsecret.com... For all to see from this thread made by you, you are doing a nice job proving very well that it's you who don't separate fact from fiction, you have proven time and time again that you're not able to differentiate what is real and what is fantasy, you have demonstrated time and time again your ridiculous >>Don't bother me with the facts, my mind is made up!

Originally posted by Illustronic
So it's a resolution anomaly, it does funny things to square pixels imaging organic nature. I could have told you on page one it is a terrain map and the photographic resolution is 10-meters/pixel, LRO has imaged under .5 meters per pixel recently as it has lowered its orbital ellipse. But even at that one has to consider the speed that the camera is traversing the ground, motion distortion is impossible to fully get rid of, its why several passes are merged together and final images take a while to go public. Still, 25 km high at nearly 6,000 mph the ground at one meter is going to give you hundredths of a second to image it, and crap does happen.

What you say there is pure "speculation" from your side. Or is it just your attempt to discredit the image of these V shaped lights anomalies ?
Just because the orbiters are moving does not make the Lunar images "blurry"