It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Oxize
Some years ago David Wilcock had some credibility in hiself, but latetly he talk more about nonense. It seems how more conferences he is doing how more nonense he tell.
This goes the same for Steven Greer, which i liked alot in the past, but last years, he he talked also like David. He talked about channeling with UFO and other stuff.
I am an believer, but there need to be common sense to their talkings. If David or Steven Greer starts talking how they met an UFO or can make contact with it, ill skip to the next chapter.
To bad their ruining their own reputation.
Steven Greer had alot of credibility, but smacked himself with the UFO contact nonsense and the energy device he was working on with some scientists.
I hope there or some good ppl left which care about truth, instead of telling crap.
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by MamaJ
So which crazy theory regarding space are you referring to? Is it our position in regards to the galactic plane? We passed the galactic plane three million years back and will not be returning to it for another 30-40 million years. Is it our position in regards to the galactic equator? We align with the galactic equator every year. For the past few decades that alignment has occurred on December 21. 1998 was the ear where we had the most accurate alignment for that date. Since then we have been moving closer and closer to the alignment occurring on December 22. Are you referring to the crazy Nibiru theories? Those have been debunked over and over and even Sitchin didn't believe the 2012 claims made by Lieder and crew. You're going to have to be a bit more specific than "space." There have been a lot of crazy 2012 theories related to "space." It would be helpful to know which one of these nonsense theories you are subscribing to.
On another note, 2012 has no real significance for the Maya. It is just as significant as the end of the 12th baktun, 11th baktun, 10th baktun, etc. Apart from that there are no other ancient prophecies dealing with 2012. Unless of course you have stumbled across some obscure prophecy that I have not been able to dig up in my countless hours of research. I so I would love to hear about it. While you're at it, since you have done so much research, you must know of an example of the Long Count that ends after the 13th baktun. Would you mind telling me what that example is since I have not turned up any and apparently neither has anyone that believes in this 2012 nonsense.
So anything that doesn't feel good to you is deemed crazy? What crazy theory I am referring to is not any you have mentioned. Why should I be more specific with you when all you will do is not accept it even if it slapped you in the face.
While I would love to spill the beans on all of my research
We do not know everything about space nor do we know everything about our Earth.
For now though I take a back seat but in time I will put all my studies out in black and white for all to see.
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
The truth of the matter is the only reason anyone places any kind of significance on 2012 is because of the Maya. There are no claims regarding 2012 that predate 1984 which is when the GMT correlation was created. Yet there is not a single Mayan prophecy associated with 2012. Nobody has even been able to provide me with an example of the Long Count ending after the 13th baktun. So anyone that claims something is going to happen in 2012 are merely piggy backing on false claims made by New Age authors in the 80s. That is the most accurate way to describe the 2012 phenomenon.
reply to post by Xcalibur254
This is where my attitude comes from. I have yet to actually meet a 2012 believer who can back up their claims with legitimate facts. Of course I'm always open to someone proving me wrong. You can start b providing an example of the Long Count that ends after 13.0.0.0.0. That's all I'm asking for right now. This is the core premise of all 2012 theories and yet no one can provide an example. If no one can prove this as being correct why should we listen to what they have to say on the topic of 2012?
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by MamaJ
So anything that doesn't feel good to you is deemed crazy? What crazy theory I am referring to is not any you have mentioned. Why should I be more specific with you when all you will do is not accept it even if it slapped you in the face.
You were vague before and now you find some odd excuse as to why you to continue being vague.
I suggest you had nothing to offer in the first place despite some comment about having all of the links.
While I would love to spill the beans on all of my research
There is another claim followed by another poor reason for being vague.
We do not know everything about space nor do we know everything about our Earth.
Typical suggestion from those that can't figure things out. There is no need to know everything if you know enough to understand a particular issue.
For now though I take a back seat but in time I will put all my studies out in black and white for all to see.
Do you mind if I do not believe you?
I think the first thing to know is where we are at in Space and how our Planet and other bodies in our Solar System react to certain points in space.
What is at the core?