It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by marg6043
I have an 18 year son and if he has to serve in the military volunteer or not, I will like my son to serve his country with honor not in false pretenses and lies.
If my son has to give his life for his country I want to feel that his death was to keep others and me safe not because the stupidity and irrationality of our leaders
Originally posted by nanna_of_6
Grady, please explain to us why you would want George W Bush to remain in office,...... knowing that the Iraqi war is a farce and our people along with their citizens are dying ,....... for NOTHING , just as it was back in the Vietnam War ?
Are you married ? Do you have grown children at the age where they could be drafted into war, when the draft-starts ?
If you do have children,....... how,... or should I say WHY would you want to subject your child to such a horrorble end ?
You say you know what Nam was like (first hand), so why ????
In 1993, President Clinton signed Public Law 103-199, authorizing a memorial in Washington to those who died in the ``unprecedented imperial Communist holocaust'' that began in 1917. It is a memorial long overdue. And it is well-suited to Washington, the capital of the Free World and the headquarters of what President Kennedy called the ``long twilight struggle'' against the totalitarians of the Left. When completed, the Victims of Communism Memorial will include a museum documenting the crimes committed by the disciples of Marx and Lenin; original artifacts from the bitter night of Communist brutality (a piece of the Berlin Wall, a cell from the ``Hanoi Hilton''); and a database preserving the names of those wiped out in history's greatest slaughter.
[...]
For pure murderous evil, there has never been a force to compare with Communism. The Nazis didn't come close. The Holocaust was uniquely malignant - never before or since did one people construct a vast industry of death for the sole purpose of rounding up and destroying every single member of another people. But the Nazis exterminated 11 million innocents; the Communist death toll surpasses 100 million. Nazi power lasted from 1933 to 1945. The Communist nightmare began in November 1917, and continues to this day.
[...]
Communism equaled murder in North Vietnam as far back as 1945, when Ho Chi Minh resolved to annihilate his Nationalist rivals. ``It was appalling,'' recorded the historian Lucien Bodard. ``Thousands, maybe tens of thousands of men had been liquidated . . .. The intention was that horror and dread should extinguish the last trace of respect for them among the masses: Their execution had to be both shameful and terrifying. That was the reason for the mass executions of hundreds at once, the fields of prisoners buried alive, the harrows dragged over men buried up to the neck.''
[...]
One hundred million victims of Communism. And those are only the victims who were slain. It doesn't include those who were maimed or driven mad. Those whose lives went dark when a loved one was butchered. Those who spun out their years in potato queues, in vodka stupors, in daily fear. It doesn't include those who wasted 30 years as slaves in Siberia. The boat people who flung themselves into the South China Sea. The stifled poets, the gagged priests, the tormented refuseniks, the exiled democrats.
Rarely do we think of them, or of the hundred million. We forget how pathologically evil Communism has been, or why we poured so much blood and treasure into fighting the Cold War. It is to correct that amnesia that the Victims of Communism Memorial will be built.
www.gulag.hu...
...[T]he Soviet Union appears the greatest megamurderer of all, apparently killing near 61,000,000 people. Stalin himself is responsible for almost 43,000,000 of these. Most of the deaths, perhaps around 39,000,000 are due to lethal forced labor in gulag and transit thereto. Communist China up to 1987, but mainly from 1949 through the cultural revolution, which alone may have seen over 1,000,000 murdered, is the second worst megamurderer. Then there are the lesser megamurderers, such as North Korea and Tito's Yugoslavia.
Obviously the population that is available to kill will make a big difference in the total democide, and thus the annual percentage rate of democide is revealing. By far, the most deadly of all communist countries and, indeed, in this century by far, has been Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge. Pol Pot and his crew likely killed some 2,000,000 Cambodians from April 1975 through December 1978 out of a population of around 7,000,000. This is an annual rate of over 8 percent of the population murdered, or odds of an average Cambodian surviving Pol Pot's rule of slightly over just over 2 to 1.
In sum the communist probably have murdered something like 110,000,000, or near two-thirds of all those killed by all governments, quasi-governments, and guerrillas from 1900 to 1987. Of course, the world total itself it shocking. It is several times the 38,000,000 battle-dead that have been killed in all this century's international and domestic wars. Yet the probable number of murders by the Soviet Union alone--one communist country-- well surpasses this cost of war. And those murders of communist China almost equal it.
[...]
Communism has been the greatest social engineering experiment we have ever seen. It failed utterly and in doing so it killed over 100,000,000 men, women, and children, not to mention the near 30,000,000 of its subjects that died in its often aggressive wars and the rebellions it provoked. But there is a larger lesson to be learned from this horrendous sacrifice to one ideology. That is that no one can be trusted with power. The more power the center has to impose the beliefs of an ideological or religious elite or impose the whims of a dictator, the more likely human lives are to be sacrificed. This is but one reason, but perhaps the most important one, for fostering liberal democracy.
www.mega.nu:8080...
North Vietnamese troops or their guerrilla Viet Cong surely committed more democide than that for which I have been able to find estimates. Throughout the guerrilla period and during the war they shelled and attacked civilians in strategic hamlets and refugee camps, attacked refugees fleeing on the roads in order to create chaos, shelled civilians in most government controlled cities and towns, and purposely mined and booby-trapped civilian areas (as of mining roads traveled by civilian buses). Moreover, thousands or tens of thousands were abducted to disappear forever, but are not included here under assassinations and executions. The sources give no estimates of these killings and to leave it at this would thus create a large hole in the total democide. Accordingly, I will assume that the additional deaths from these North Vietnam/Viet Cong atrocities and terror amounted to at least 200 a month over the twenty-one years from 1955 to the end of the war. This seems consistent with both sympathetic and unsympathetic descriptions of North Vietnamese and Viet Cong tactics and actions during the war, especially in considering that as a minimum the 200 dead covers the length and breadth of the unestimated North Vietnam/Viet Cong atrocities and terror throughout all of South Vietnam for some thirty days.
[...]
Then there are the boat people for whose deaths at sea Hanoi is responsible. Some of these Vietnamese were forced to flee, some fled out of terror and fear for their lives, some fled by virtue of unlivable conditions that the communists had created for them. To understand the drive to flee on the dangerous open ocean often in unseaworthy boats is to realize the deadly hazards they faced from the regime, as discussed in Death By Government. The table lists estimates of the number of Vietnamese boat people that fled or tried to flee (lines 702 to 711) and their consolidation (line 713). Estimates of the percent of these then dying at sea are also given and consolidated (lines 716 to 730), followed by death estimates (lines 733 to 748). The consolidation of these (749) gives us one overall range of deaths. I calculate another by applying the consolidated percentage mortality to the consolidated number fleeing (line 750). Neither of these totals especially commends itself. In the usual fashion, I therefore took the lowest low and highest high and averaged the two mid-values to get the final range (line 751).
How many of these deaths is the responsibility of the communist Vietnamese, that is, democide? Neither the extremes of "none" or "all" is reasonable. Surely those who were forced to face death at sea, or risked it out of mortal fear of the regime or because their lives and families had been irretrievably ruined by it, should be counted as democide (by analogy consider that if children fled their family in winter because they fear being killed or are brutally abused, and then die of exposure in the snow, the parents could be tried for murder). However, those boat people who left for non-vital reasons, such as for economic reasons, and died at sea should hardly be counted as democide. What the proportion is between the two types of refugees is unknown. I assume that those for which the regime must be held responsible could vary from one-third to two-thirds, most reasonably a half of them. Applying this to the number who fled yields a likely Vietnam democide of 250,000 boat people (line 753).
www.mega.nu:8080...
Originally posted by nanna_of_6
,Affirmitive Reaction, if you THINK my first post has been changed, ..... please do tell what was in my first post before I supposively changed it ?
Originally posted by Affirmative Reaction
Originally posted by nanna_of_6
,Affirmitive Reaction, if you THINK my first post has been changed, ..... please do tell what was in my first post before I supposively changed it ?
You know exactly what the initial thread said, as you were the one who changed it after you were proven wrong. Go back and actually read my last post....you have no scruples...you have no honor...you are so afraid of being wrong that you edit your posts to change the questions you ask so that you can erroneously claim that you "never said that". Sorry, that's simply a lie, you know it, I know it, and fans around the world know it!
You said that Kerry never admitted to committing war crimes as the swiftvets proved in their spot by using Kerry's own words against him. You have now edited it, TWICE, because you were proven so utterly wrong by the video I posted. It's too bad that you don't have the integrity to admit when you have been proven wrong. But hey, you did a good job on the "bait and switch" there, since nobody quoted your entire post, there is no exact proof of what you REALLY posted. However, anyone with a lick of sense can read the resulting posts and clearly see what you did. And those that posted before you changed it know what it said as well. You aren't fooling anyone but yourself.....
[edit on 21-9-2004 by Affirmative Reaction]
Originally posted by elaine
I know how you feel Marg. My only son is 20, and of course I love him dearly. That's one reason I feel so passionately about this war. Alot of those kids over in Iraq really did'nt know what they were in for just being out of highschool and all. Alot of them are just kids.
Originally posted by nanna_of_6
It seems very strange that YOU, sir, are the only that has made such a statement.
I had explained how I do my posts (most of the time) and if you can not except my answer, ........... than thats too bad,...... for you, because it happened the way I said it did.
Originally posted by Affirmative Reaction
Right...you keep sticking to that story if it makes you feel good. Of course, why would the first five or six posts say what they do if that were true? Sorry, doesn't match. But hey, I'm not going to argue with you any longer. I'll just remember from now on to quote you first. You can't edit the content of MY posts.....
Originally posted by nanna_of_6
I'd suggest you look at the top of your screen that explains the "RULES" in the Mud Pit. You have been personally attacking and insulting me on two of my threads,.... specially this thread .
NOW BACK OFF !
[edit on 21-9-2004 by nanna_of_6]
Originally posted by nanna_of_6
Let me introduce myself: My name is Gary Jacobson. I served with B Co 2nd/7th 1st Air Cavalry '66 - '67, as a combat infantryman. We called ourselves "Grunts," operating out of LZ Betty near beautiful downtown Phan Thiet, Vietnam. Mine was the same unit as depicted in the movie, "We Were Soldiers," only one year later. Vietnam changed us all indelibly and forever. I'm now on 100% disability rating with an extra hole in my head, covered by a 3X4 inch plate, shrapnel the size of a quarter imbedded three inches into my brain...this all compliments of a trip wire booby trap that triggered a grenade, that in turn detonated an artillery round...and in the process completely ruined my whole day...in April '67.
Yes, I too remember being met by protesters when I was offloaded on a stretcher at Travis AFB...and many sickened me because of the ignorance and where they were coming from in their diatribe.
Yes, I too remember being met by protesters when I was offloaded on a stretcher at Travis AFB
Originally posted by nanna_of_6 Now, about John Kerry...he did not say what many vets gullibly acting on rumors say he said. No way did he call all vets baby killers, or war criminals. He was referring to a specified group of men who had been with him in a "Winter Soldiers Conference" who had confessed to these acts...no one else, and certainly not all vets.
I would like to talk, representing all those veterans, and say that several months ago in Detroit, we had an investigation at which over 150 honorably discharged and many very highly decorated veterans testified to war crimes committed in Southeast Asia, not isolated incidents but crimes committed on a day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command.
It is impossible to describe to you exactly what did happen in Detroit, the emotions in the room, the feelings of the men who were reliving their experiences in Vietnam, but they did. They relived the absolute horror of what this country, in a sense, made them do.
They told the stories at times they had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam in addition to the normal ravage of war, and the normal and very particular ravaging which is done by the applied bombing power of this country.
We call this investigation the "Winter Soldier Investigation." The term "Winter Soldier" is a play on words of Thomas Paine in 1776 when he spoke of the Sunshine Patriot and summertime soldiers who deserted at Valley Forge because the going was rough.
We who have come here to Washington have come here because we feel we have to be winter soldiers now. We could come back to this country; we could be quiet; we could hold our silence; we could not tell what went on in Vietnam, but we feel because of what threatens this country, the fact that the crimes threaten it, not reds, and not redcoats but the crimes which we are committing that threaten it, that we have to speak out.
ice.he.net...
In our opinion and from our experience, there is nothing in South Vietnam which could happen that realistically threatens the United States of America. And to attempt to justify the loss of one American life in Vietnam, Cambodia or Laos by linking such loss to the preservation of freedom, which those misfits supposedly abuse, is to us the height of criminal hypocrisy.
209.157.64.200...
Vietnam: Independent Investigation of Easter Week Atrocities Needed Now
A Human Rights Watch Briefing Paper
Vietnamese officials and civilians acting on their behalf beat and killed dozens of Montagnards during Easter week demonstrations in the Central Highlands, when thousands of people gathered to protest confiscation of ancestral lands and religious repression, according to new eyewitness testimony obtained by Human Rights Watch.
In response to an international outcry, in late April and early May the Vietnamese government organized highly controlled visits to the highlands by international media, diplomats, and U.N. agencies. Montagnards interviewed by Human Rights Watch reported that Vietnamese officials prevented them from providing an accurate picture of events.
Human Rights Watch called on the government of Vietnam to immediately allow full and unhindered access to independent human rights organizations and U.N. special rapporteurs to investigate the reports of extrajudicial killings, human rights abuses, and other violations of international humanitarian law in the Central Highland provinces of Dak Lak, Dak Nong, Gia Lai and Lam Dong. hrw.org...
Vietnam
REPRESSION OF MONTAGNARDS
Conflicts over Land and Religion in Vietnam's Central Highlands Vietnam should cease its persecution of indigenous Montagnards in the Central Highlands, and Cambodia should continue to offer sanctuary to
those fleeing across the border, Human Rights Watch said in this new report.
The 200-page
report, Repression of Montagnards: Conflicts over land and Religion
in Vietnam's Central Highlands, provides the most detailed account to date of the unrest that erupted in the Central Highlands of Vietnam in early 2001
and offers a rare glimpse into the mechanisms of Vietnamese political repression. Human Rights Watch provides an in-depth analysis of the
grievances that gave rise to the protests, and an analysis of the human rights violations that took place in response to them. It found that the
Vietnamese government violated fundamental human rights in the course of suppressing the protests, and that those violations-which range
from government infringement of religious freedom to torture by police-were continuing as of March 2002.
HRW Index No.: 2726
ISBN: 1-56432-2726, 04/02, 204pp., $15.00
Purchase online:
store.yahoo.com...
www.hrw.org...
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Another thing is that since I started to research Kerry, the number of left-wing sites defending his actions after Vietnam have exploded and the VVAW is all over the place.
Originally posted by nanna_of_6
........................
Of course the VVAW is all over the internet , syanding with John Kerry,....... they know him and know that John Kerry "DID" everything possible to help bring our "troops" home from Vietnam ..................
..............
Originally posted by nanna_of_6
I don't get it Grady ...WHY are you RESEARCHING him [Kerry] ????????????? Anyone that REALLY knows John Kerry,..... up-front and personal, would not need to "research" John .
Think About it
Originally posted by keholmes
didn't Kerry found the VVAW as a propaganda wing for him or something?
Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW)
Viet Nam Veterans Against the War was founded in 1967 and, at the height of its effectiveness in the late 1960s, claimed over 40,000 members. VVAW participated in and organized antiwar demonstrations, public education efforts, militant actions, and public hearings. The full text of one public hearing, The Winter Soldier Investigation (1970), is made available by the Sixties Project. We hope to bring more 1960s VVAW material on-line in the near future.
The Sixties Project also archives the following documents on VVAW:
A Veteran Speaks--Against the War, by Robert Muller
Statement by John Kerry, to the Senate Committee of Foreign Relations
VVAW still exists today. The VVAW of the 1990s is quite different from the VVAW of the 1960s, but still maintains an active presence as a veterans' peace organization. As the number of American soldiers in Vietnam decreased in the early 1970s, membership in the VVAW (along with antiwar activism in general) waned. In the mid-1970s the shrinking VVAW was riven by a struggle between radical and liberal members. After a contested election in 1978 and a lawsuit between feuding parties, the energies of both sides were diminished. The liberal wing won the right to use the VVAW name, and the much smaller radical Marxist wing was granted the appellation VVAW-AI (Anti-Imperialist). Both groups were quickly overshadowed by the newer Vietnam Veterans of America (VVA) founded in 1978 by Robert Muller, which is currently the largest Vietnam veterans organization. Since the late 1980s, VVA has itself split into two organizations--the Vietnam Veterans of America Foundation was started by Muller when he departed Vietnam Veterans of America.
Kerry in 1971: 'Our Democracy is a Farce'
By Marc Morano
CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer
April 22, 2004
(CNSNews.com) - John Kerry, the presumed Democratic nominee for president, was quoted by a student newspaper at West Virginia's Bethany College in 1971 as saying, "Our democracy is a farce; it is not the best in the world."
Kerry made the remarks on Nov. 2, 1971, according to the Bethany College student newspaper, The Tower . CNSNews.com has obtained a copy of the article written by John Majors, which details Kerry's visit to the college and appeared in the Nov. 11, 1971 issue of the newspaper. At the time, Kerry was still a leader of the anti-war group, Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW).
www.cnsnews.com...\SpecialReports\archive\200404\SPE20040422a.html
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
How much pillow-talk have you had Mr. Kerry?
[edit on 04/9/22 by GradyPhilpott]