It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by bottleslingguy
How do you know how far away the objects were do you know how much zoom was being used or the EXACT location they filmed from?
Originally posted by FlySolo
reply to post by wmd_2008
There is no need. Watching her video you can clearly see they are looking south to SW. If the airport is behind them five miles, the exact location is irrelevant. It knocks all plane theories to the swampy mud below
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Originally posted by FlySolo
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Originally posted by FlySolo
reply to post by wmd_2008
There is no need. Watching her video you can clearly see they are looking south to SW. If the airport is behind them five miles, the exact location is irrelevant. It knocks all plane theories to the swampy mud below
Care to prove the EXACT location they filmed from if you can!
Got a utube channel? Go ask her yourself. And be polite about it. But I don't understand why you still need to know that in light of already knowing the airport is behind them. They're not cessnas performing touch and goes at the airport.
How do I know because YOU say that or she says THAT , someone from that area posted that there are 3 airfields in the area NOT one, or are they all behind her.edit on 21-2-2012 by wmd_2008 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by CmdrZero
reply to post by Zcustosmorum
Show me Chinese lanterns that big that can move like these things do and I'll reconsider my opinion. To me it's a question of proportion. There are periods on the video where there are fairly good stable views of the lights. I estimate the range from the camera to be from as close as three miles to as far as ten miles at certain points. I've seen internally lighted hot air balloons at those ranges and these lights appear to about a quarter of their size. Meaning they're the size of a large truck. That would be one hell of a Chinese lantern.
But, as stated I'll keep an open mind.
Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by Xoanon
No one said she was at an airport did they, but 3 airfields in the area kind of shots the ufo claims down!edit on 21-2-2012 by wmd_2008 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by Xoanon
No one said she was at an airport did they, but 3 airfields in the area kind of shots the ufo claims down!edit on 21-2-2012 by wmd_2008 because: (no reason given)
the lights go from above the clouds to below and in front of the ridge line. can't be planes and planes don't act like that.
Originally posted by Xoanon
Thank you all for being here to make this a great thread,
I would like to reiterate that the video that I posted on page 1 of this thread was from 'EbensR4Real'.
He or she is not the original poster of this video.
This girl is...
Briar Rose's YouTube Channel...
www.youtube.com...
And this is the video that she posted
Interestingly enough the first thing she says is, "Waiting for something to happen".
You will notice from her YouTube channel that this is the first thing of this kind that she has posted.
She does not hang out at airports recording planes.
Thanks again everyone.
X.edit on 21-2-2012 by Xoanon because: .
Originally posted by Anon77
I've just been in touch with the original youtube poster to tell her about this thread and ask her about the sighting, Have encouraged her to register here and comment on the thread. Hopefully she will do. This is her youtube channel.
I think that is what is important about footage like this- high strangeness factor.
Originally posted by FlySolo
Below is the zoomed in airport and the picture was rotated 180 degrees. Notice north is at the bottom as indicated by the google compass top right.
I've triangulated your approximate position of the kids at 2.4 miles with the yellow lines. The red lines = 6.9 miles outward from the runways. Notice the lake in the center and the fields throughout. Not the terrain the film shows. They are in a residential area.
Now here I've rotated it back to we can see the eight counties that make up the foothills. The airport is north of there. Which would contradict the sunset. Without knowing exactly where they are, so far the evidence tends to suggest that the airport is behind them. I can dig into the triangulation photo and try to see what's there regarding vantage points but I don't think they're anywhere near there.
It's really after the 3:50 mark. If those are cessnas as you say, that incline is way too steep. It's literally ascending at 120 degrees. And there are two lights prior to going behind the branch, then only one.
i dont want to take to news cause no one will believe me, and yea no airports only vast fields and deep forrest we live in the valley the airport is 5 miles behind of where this was filmed and its an airport for little planes for crops and such
Five miles behind the airport they were. So I was correct. They are south of the airport. So I hope we can all stop with the airplanes coming in for a landing. I knew there was something to this sighting.
The only other thing that resembles an airport is the Jones aviation museum. Go search for it. It's a shack at the end of a dirt road.
Originally posted by Kali74
You've really backed up your facts, some still look odd to me but it is a shakey vid. I'd like it to be earth lights or even stranger but I think you got it. Thank-you.
OP, despite what the overly negative have commented, I don't think this was a waste of time at all. A good discussion is taking place as well as some learning. Thank-you.
Originally posted by CmdrZero
For any and all interested here's a stabilized version of the video.
Follow this link youtu.be...
After playing with the video a couple of things caught my eye.
This image is of what appears to be a tower of some sort. What's weird is that it's not lighted and as tall as it is (unless it's a well disguised tree) it should be. The Oroville Municipal Airport is 3 miles SW of downtown Oroville. Looking at aerial navigational maps I couldn't find any towers of any sort where they should be if what we see in the video is air traffic (the touch and go's mentioned).
I also discovered that the airport has no tower so considering the time of the day and the fact that these things continue past dusk I don't think these are student pilots. In fact I think the FAA would have a bowel movement if they discovered that that many students (obviously not IFR certified) were out there practicing at that time of day. There's also the fact that the lights appear to be several miles away from the airport at different times and that's not the usual way T&G's work. They generally never get more than a couple of miles away from the airport before they circle for a landing.
Then there's the landing light theory. I lived at the end of San Diego International for a while and I used to work near the near the airport in Memphis. I've seen landing lights. These are not landing lights and as big as they are they sure as hell aren't landing lights on a small Cessna. No way!
The helicopter theory is another hard one to buy. I have never seen a police helicopter use a search light where there wasn't a distinguishable beam to the ground. Traffic helicopters are dinky little things and I've never seen one equipped with search lights. So, I don't think these are helicopters.
That kind of leaves the military and you know who plus whose to say that they aren't one and the same? There is enough military in the area to certainly make them suspect but even they have rules. The one that stands out is the minimum altitude that must be maintained over inhabited areas. Some of these lights dip down so near the ground they must have been completely silent not to disturb folks on the ground.
I won't even discuss the Chinese lantern theory unless some one can show me one the size of a large weather balloon that would need a propane torch to heat it up.
What are they? Damned if I know but I'd sure like too. And for all the nonsensical crap the OP has had to deal with I have the urge to S&F him again.
It will be interesting to see if these things are ever positively identified but I won't hold my breath. Good job OP!edit on 21-2-2012 by CmdrZero because: hopefully to correct "malformed" linksedit on 21-2-2012 by CmdrZero because: gave up with the built in ATS linker