It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
from above source and its available for down-lode as well and finally nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com... this further clarifies what actually constitutes a dog bite and shows that dog bites have been on the decline since 1971 so i dont think any dog needs to be exterminated or banned as then they will just keep moving on down the list until we cant own any animal that could ever potentially hurt a human ever so punish the deed not the breed
TextStudy highlights A matched case-control design comprising 178 pairs of dogs (about 18% of all reported dog bites in the testing area) was used. Cases were selected from dogs reported to Denver Animal Control in 1991 for a first-bite episode of a nonhousehold member that required medical treatment. The median age of the bite victims was 12 years (range, 1 to 83 years); 64.7% of bite victims were males. Of the 83 bite victims, aged 12 and younger, 33 (40%) were bitten on the face, head or neck. When indicated on the bite report forms, 75.8% of all incidents, 32 (23.7%) of bites were recorded as severe. Bite report forms indicated where the bite episode occurred for 101 (56.7%) of the incidents. Of these, 51 (50.5%) took place on the sidewalk, street, alley or playground; 30 (29.7%) in the owner's yard; 14 (13.9%) in the owner's house; and 4 (4.0%) in the victim's yard. Dogs predominantly of chihuahua, golden retriever, labrador retriever, poodle, Scottish terrier, and Shetland sheepdog breeds were more common among nonbiting than among the biting dogs. None of the cases and only one control dog was a pit bull terrier. Dogs predominantly of German shepherd, chow chow, collie and akita breeds were substantially more frequent among biting than nonbiting dogs. The total numbers of dogs mainly collie (n=9) and akita (n=5) breeds were small compared to the total numbers of German shepherd (n=47) and chow chows (n=40). Biting dogs were significantly more likely to reside in homes with one or more children, ages 10 years and younger, and to be chained while in the yard. Of the 83 chained dogs, 44 (53%) had growled or snapped at visitors to the house. This same behavior, however, was reported in unchained dogs 44% of the time.
Originally posted by elouina
reply to post by _R4t_
And does an animal with a peanut brain recognize a baby as a human? Or even as a superior?
Originally posted by nightstalker78
Nancy Grace? Really? But yes,I believe they should be banned.They're nasty dogs.They're bred to be the way they are.And for anyone who says 'its the owner,not the dog'. Bull# and you know it.Certain breeds are just not meant to be kept as pets.Pit Bulls being the #1 choice.
And just how would you enforce that age limit?Have to add your birthday when registering?Or better yet,fax a copy of your id over to ats?have to use a credit card with that to prove you are who you say??All of those options just...suck.There's plenty of young posters here who leave well thought out replies(rise against comes to mind).It's not age it's just a matter of intelligence in my book.There's ignorant people of all ages.
Originally posted by rebellender
Back to the Ethnic peoples
Dogs are born with inherited instincts. Regardless of what people may think, our dogs are not humans. Our pet dogs live in a human environment, but they do not live, act or breath the same way us humans do. There is a term that is used whereby us humans apply our human characteristics to our pet dogs. That term is call 'Anthropomorphism'.
But when small children are involved, it has been my experience that dogs almost always consider the children equal or lower in the pack hierarchy than they are, and this is where the problem arises.
Because the dog considers the child a subordinate, it may refuse to obey the child's commands or 'accidentally' bump into the child and knock her down. It may escalate to growling at the child when the child is near food or toys, or even baring his teeth and biting when the child approaches or tries to play with the dog. It is essential that the parent understands this hierarchal relationship and takes precautions to prevent problems from arising.
Originally posted by cryptographrix
reply to post by nightstalker78
Edward Bernays, hun, not Alex Jones. Read the book.
And yes, what makes it propaganda is that you're trying to trap people with emotional pleas - namely, "What if a pit bull mauled your baby?"
That one is sooo overused by this point.
My daughter comes into contact with at least 2 pit bulls a week at the park, and has been almost every day for two years at this point - and none of them have even played violently with her, let alone bit her.
I'm living the reality. No "what ifs."
Now take a dog that has the potential to be aggressive.
Originally posted by rebellender
reply to post by nightstalker78
hey now, you are misspelling words. you are exposed for what you are let it go, have a good night and let those that have pit pulls have a good night too. your post history exposes you for what you are trying to do right here...ok?
Originally posted by rebellender
reply to post by elouina
Now take a dog that has the potential to be aggressive.
any animal has the potential to be aggressive, any animal. pits get singled out because of Jaw strength...