It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by dc1138
Can you explain an opening at the north pole, so that would be under the ice cap and on the seabed
Why doesn't the sea drain away
Originally posted by tpaine1809
reply to post by OldHag
I wish I could read that. I get what you are saying and if that is true holy crap!
Originally posted by tpaine1809
reply to post by thepupils
www.daylightmap.com...
This proves the possibility of two suns. Look how the light hits the earth. If there were 2 suns and we were on the inside of the circle we would see it this way. Those two light spots are representation of the possibility of 2 suns.
Originally posted by 3danimator
reply to post by Spiratio
Yes, science is always changing, but there comes a point with certain subjects where we can say with absolute certitude that our understanding is 100% correct. That we have studied it and understood it for long enough and we have locked. The composition of the air around us is locked. That will never change. We understand that. Same for the motion of the planets and stars. And same for the fact that the earth is solid.
Do we understand the full composition of whats under the mantle? No. But we understand enough to say with 100% conviction that its solid. Just because some details might be unknown will change does not mean that our fundemental understanding is THAT flawed.
Is there a small chance that the earth has a second sun in its centre and an inner and outer shell? No. There really isnt.
Originally posted by cypruswolf
reply to post by tpaine1809
The earth isn't hollow, basic freshmen level geology proves this. We know the composition of magma bodies and elements within the geological structures and histories of geologic formations, We understand plate tectonics, fueled by the radioactive energy within the mantle. The Earths magnetic field is the result largely of the iron core. Gravity and Magnetism are still separate forces. Simply put the idea of a hollow earth is bad science.
Science has a method to provide PROOF of something
Yes, science is always changing, but there comes a point with certain subjects where we can say with absolute certitude that our understanding is 100% correct
Originally posted by purplemer
Originally posted by cypruswolf
reply to post by tpaine1809
The earth isn't hollow, basic freshmen level geology proves this. We know the composition of magma bodies and elements within the geological structures and histories of geologic formations, We understand plate tectonics, fueled by the radioactive energy within the mantle. The Earths magnetic field is the result largely of the iron core. Gravity and Magnetism are still separate forces. Simply put the idea of a hollow earth is bad science.
and you know all this.. how..? because someone has told you its the case. We have drilled less than 10 miles into the earth. We have many theories to what is down there but until we go down and look we really dont know. and we dont understand plate tectonics.. if we did we would be able to predict earthquakes.
its best not to be too sure of anything..
No, we know this by reasoned scientific methodology and practices. You clearly are against science and have NO understanding of how we come to the theories