It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
reply to post by Spiratio
As Ramana Maharshi says there is no evolution and there is no material universe....
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
O.K. so basically the gods demanded human sacrifice but this was as I mentioned started with the Solar eclipse of the Sun by the moon -- the eclipse or sacrifice of the Son -- the first born -- so a goat was sacrificed. This is from the Turkana tribe -- one of the earliest examples -- and then the animal sacrifice became human sacrifice for the Solar city-state imperial ritual priests.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
O.K. so basically the gods demanded human sacrifice but this was as I mentioned started with the Solar eclipse of the Sun by the moon -- the eclipse or sacrifice of the Son -- the first born -- so a goat was sacrificed. This is from the Turkana tribe -- one of the earliest examples -- and then the animal sacrifice became human sacrifice for the Solar city-state imperial ritual priests.
Can you explain to me how "Sun" turns into "Son"? Two entirely different things, albeit homonyms.
The founder of systems theory for social science Gregory Bateson remarked: "Pythagoras and Plato knew that pattern was fundamental to all mind and ideation. But this wisdom was thrust away and lost in the midst of the supposedly indescribable mystery called 'mind.'"(82)
Social systems theory analyst Bateson makes the same point, "logic cannot model causal systems - paradox is generated when time is ignored....apart from language, there are no named classes and no-subject-predicate relations."(88)
Bateson built his social systems analysis, like the phasis of ancient Greek, around the dialectical syllogism of metaphor-- "Grass dies; Men die; Men are grass" in response to the western logical paradox "Epimenides was a Cretan who said, 'Cretans always lie'". Bateson states in Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity that "syllogisms in grass must be dominant mode of communicating interconnection of ideas...." (93) In response to the deep epistemological error in the West, like Bateson's Pythagorean social systems theory, the foundation of radical ecology chaos and complexity, or open systems theory, is also based from true music theory. As Capra describes in The Web of Life In the 1950s scientists began to actually build models of such binary networks, including some with little lamps flickering on and off at the nodes. To their great amazement they discovered that after a short time of random flickering, some ordered patterns would energy in most networks. They would see waves of flickering pass through the network, or they would observe repeated cycles. Even though the initial state of the network was chosen at random, after a while those ordered patterns would emerge spontaneously, and it was that spontaneous emergence of order that became known as 'self-organization.'(94)
Researchers from the Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie (HZB), in cooperation with colleagues from Oxford and Bristol Universities, as well as the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK, have for the first time observed a nanoscale symmetry hidden in solid state matter. They have measured the signatures of a symmetry showing the same attributes as the golden ratio famous from art and architecture.
I’ll say this: in the context of order, chaos, and criticality, being the “most irrational number” is THE property you want to pay attention to. In total order, nothing happens, nothing grows. In total chaos, nothing grows either. Things grow somewhere *in between* those. See “edge of chaos”, “(self-organized) criticality”. You will see. And in there, you’ll always find the golden mean. Because it is the most durable, resilient structure. The one that does not collapse on the onset of chaos. (technically, the last KAM tori to collapse on the onset of chaos)
The classical periodic orbits and the quantum mechanical spectrum are closely bound together through the mathematical process called Fourier analysis. The hidden regularities in one set, and the frequencies with which they show up, are exactly given by the other set. … The energies at which the atoms absorb radiation appear to be quite random, but a Fourier analysis converts the jumble of peaks into a set of wellseparated peaks. The important feature here is that each of the well-separated peaks corresponds precisely to one of several standard classical periodic orbits. Poincaré's insistence on the importance of periodic orbits now takes on a new meaning. Not only does the classical organization of phase space depend critically on the classical periodic orbits, but so too does the understanding of a chaotic quantum spectrum.404
405 Steven Strogatz, “The End of Insight,” The Edge World Question Center 2006, “What Is Your
Observation replaces insight. Mathematics becomes a spectator sport.
If this is happening in mathematics, the supposed pinnacle of human reasoning, it
seems likely to afflict us in science too, first in physics and later in biology and the social sciences...When the End of Insight comes, the nature of explanation in science will change forever. We'll be stuck in an age of authoritarianism, except it'll no longer be coming from politics or religious dogma, but from science itself.405
Could entanglement be a signature of chaos? Jessen and his collaborators think so. According to Jessen’s coauthor Shohini Ghose of Wilfrid Laurier University, theoretical papers have discussed potential links between entanglement and chaos for some time, but this is the first experiment to demonstrate the relationship. [The emergence of entanglement as a signature of chaos] “is very interesting to those who want to have a lot of entanglement in a system—it’s the fuel that helps with quantum computing. So if chaos helps to increase entanglement, that’s a good thing,” Ghose says. “But it also makes it harder to predict.” Jessen adds, “Chaos in entanglement could be why quantum computing is so difficult.”410
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
Well if you read my masters thesis
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
As I quoted from my masters thesis here
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
Then I discovered the Actual Matrix Plan conspiracy based on the same conspiracy -- corroborating my discovery -- only supporting it.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
1. I’m still confused about the only supporting it part, in view of your already saying that the actual matrix plan corroborated your discovery. Why did you add the statement "only supporting it"? Please explain.
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
The big error I made in my masters thesis was that I stated the logistic equations of chaos create the Tai-Chi symbol but the logistic equations are symmetric whereas the Tai-Chi symbol is not symmetric.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
The big error I made in my masters thesis was that I stated the logistic equations of chaos create the Tai-Chi symbol but the logistic equations are symmetric whereas the Tai-Chi symbol is not symmetric.
have to do with my question?
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
Yeah you're quoting me saying "only supporting it" but I don't know the full sentence of what you're quoting. haha.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
Yeah you're quoting me saying "only supporting it" but I don't know the full sentence of what you're quoting. haha.
It comes from your own OP!
You're a piece of work, ya know?
Go to your room!! (Just kidding.)
Then I discovered the Actual Matrix Plan conspiracy based on the same conspiracy -- corroborating my discovery -- only supporting it.