It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ThoughtForms
reply to post by poetpiet
the next time you meet a god won't you want to be able to understand more than just a symbolic poetic version of what that god is trying to tell you?
just thinking out loud... so to speak...
Peace,
-TFedit on 17-2-2012 by ThoughtForms because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
Frequency is a Western term already assuming sound as spatial distance. 90% of human history used the Perfect Fifth-Perfect Fourth-Octave intervals as complementary opposites so that is the proper "tuning" system -- just the simple 1:2:3:4 intervals and that's it.
So, you're saying frequency as modern science knows it is irrelevant to music. But then you talk about intervals as relevant. How were the intervals ascertained for 90% of human history? Simply by listening? No aids?
Another excellent example of this harmonic resonance of macroquantum holographic technology is physicist Itzahk Bentov’s book Stalking the Wild Pendulum (1977). Bentov’s focus is on the classical amplitude ELF brain-ionosphere wave, just as with Dr. Andrija Puharich and now the Project Haarp.
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
Listening to the heart beat for example - is really the easiest thing I'm talking about.
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
n India this transition to the Solar Freemasonic priesthood of ritual mass sacrifice was documented and promoted by math professor Abraham Seidenberg. The late UC-Berkeley math professor Abraham Seidenberg gives great credence to the structural basis of Freemasonry controlling science. Similarly, as Abraham Seidenberg documented, the Pythagorean triangles in Egypt had the base of the triangle equaling Isis, and the height as Osiris, and the hypotenuse as the complementary opposite resonance between Set and Horus. Time is not “contained” geometrically – the capstone of the pyramid is never completed – the mass ritual sacrifice continues.
Originally posted by rwfresh
Originally posted by ThoughtForms
reply to post by poetpiet
the next time you meet a god won't you want to be able to understand more than just a symbolic poetic version of what that god is trying to tell you?
just thinking out loud... so to speak...
Peace,
-TFedit on 17-2-2012 by ThoughtForms because: (no reason given)
No one can tell someone else what God's voice sounds like. They literally need to hear it themselves. Imagine there is a sound you can't hear and the reason you can't hear it is because someone is making a bad reproduction of the sound right into your ear without letting up. Telling you "It sounds like this!". Imagine the person making the bad reproduction of the sound is yourself. Or your ego.. telling you what God is saying
Originally posted by UncleV
There is much more to go into but not here, this thread is already 25 pages and no one knows what it is about yet!! LOL.
Listen to your heart...certainly valuable, no doubt about it. But that is rhythm, not tone, not frequency nor interval. Yes, we know most all cultures utilize the I-IV-V intervals, no argument there.
Here's what I'm thinking, correct me if I'm wrong. The OP has a vocabulary in all manner of unique things except music and frequencies.
But music has continued to rely on the basic tunings from natural consonance simple ratios. Dr. Sandy Trehub has even documented that babies naturally like consonant music while Dr. Kathleen Wermke found infants cry out in simple music ratios regularly and it's not just from exposure to music but due to auditory design. Dr. Thomas Fritz tested Western consonant tuning on the Mafa tribe in northern Cameroon – a tribe completely unexposed to Western music. The tribe correctly identified the emotions for happy, sad, and scary music. Dr. Fritz states: “The emotional expression of the music is inherent in the music itself. And it is not solely decodable through cultural imprinting.”21
Originally posted by rwfresh
reply to post by UncleV
"Listen to your heart...certainly valuable, no doubt about it. But that is rhythm, not tone, not frequency nor interval"
The heart makes sounds.. unless you are a vampire or zombie.
There is no math proof forthcoming. There can't be. That's the point.
BUT that doesn't mean what he is saying is not true. What he is saying is that to experience the proof you need to do what any good scientist would do and TEST the hypothesis. What's the experiment? LISTENING. If you do not run the experiment you can NEVER experience the proof. And this particular experiment's hypothesis is Truth itself.
Originally posted by poetpiet
regarding use and abuse of logic/pattern when it comes to definitions,
perfect pitches, frequencies, peeps at see through windows, deaf glimpses
and blind audations of breaking points, slivers and whipcrack nodes in
supracensual spectra stretching into vanishing points that have us
surrounded as well as embedded at the same time.
watertight logics as as nasty as all other such powertools and weapons.
These are more often than not pitted against and detracting from as well as preventing
not looser but loosening logics (lessening watertightness of mineral
aggregation to metabolize them and thus feed our soils and trees).
Long convoluted pabulum was once looked on favorably as alternative to and/or
prevention of war ... but it quite as often postpones, even prevents real peace.
peace.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
Listening to the heart beat for example - is really the easiest thing I'm talking about.
I thought tuning was about pitch. What about pitch?
UC-Berkeley quantum chaos math professor Ralph Abraham: “In fact, the known physical fields – electric, magnetic, gravitational, nuclear and so on – are all modeled, in mathematical physics, by the same abstract field, known to mathematics as the d’Alembertian wave equation. This is a bona-fide card-carrying member of the Cosmic Mind, and is just as fundamental to the creation of the cosmos as are the five Platonic Solids.”277 Abraham emphasizes that the early pivotal chaotic “bifurcation point” was when Kepler transferred Pythagorean harmonics of the Soul into magnitude as Force. Abraham now argues for a postmodern spiritualized science calling chaos “sacred math” to be used “until cosmic integrity prevails.”278
277 Ralph Abraham, “The New Sacred Math,” World Futures, 62: 6-16, 2006. Jean D’Alembert emphasized music theory as the secret model for reality. Christensen, Thomas. “Music Theory as Scientific Propaganda: The Case of D'Alembert's Élémens[sic] De Musique.” Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 50, No. 3 (Jul.–Sep., 1989): 409-427.
278 Ralph Abraham, “The Broken Chain, The bifurcation from soul to force, Kepler, 1605 AD,” 2005, revised 2010.
One prominent example of how music models science is the implementation of “frequency hopping.” Music healer Dr. Alice Cash documents how the current reliance on “spread spectrum” devices originated out of a music analysis: Take “frequency hopping,” in which coded signals are sent along a constantly changing set of frequencies so that the signals can be neither intercepted nor blocked. In 1942, the composer George Antheil and the actress Hedy Lamar suggested using the melody of a song as a way of sending signals in Morse code. The person receiving the message would already know what song was being used and constantly retune his receiver to the frequency of the next note in the song to hear the Morse-code version of the next letter in the message. Someone who didn't know which song was being used would have no idea what frequency to
listen to. The concept has spawned hundreds of patents and is the basis of many of
the secure communications systems now used by the U.S. military.339
339 Dr. Alice Cash, “Using Music for Brain Food,” Healing Music Enterprises. Not only are these “peer to peer” music-based spread spectrum systems becoming the norm for broadband communications but they are also becoming “self-organizing” as per the Actual Matrix Plan. The realm of research on this subject is well-covered in academia, demonstrated by the array of conferences in the subject area, as of 2008: **13th International Conference on Fuzzy Theory and Technology (FTT), **11th International Conference on Computer Science and Informatics (CSI), **9th International Conference on Computer Vision, Pattern Recognition and Image Processing (CVPR), **Special Session on Computational Intelligence in Economics and Finance (CIEF), **6th International Conference on Photonics, Networking and Computing (PNC), **8th Atlantic Symposium on Computational Biology and Genome Informatics (CBGI), **8th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Natural Computing (CIN) and for 2011 we have: The 10th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Computer and Information Science brings together scientists, engineers, computer users, and students to exchange and share their experiences, new ideas, and research results about all aspects (theory, applications and tools) of computer and information science, and discuss the practical challenges encountered and the solutions adopted.
Originally posted by rickymouse
If I dislocated a few joints I might get into that full lotus position. I'm not afraid of dying but I don't particularily like hurting. What eye are they trying to open, one between you're legs?
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
Originally posted by UncleV
There is much more to go into but not here, this thread is already 25 pages and no one knows what it is about yet!! LOL.
Listen to your heart...certainly valuable, no doubt about it. But that is rhythm, not tone, not frequency nor interval. Yes, we know most all cultures utilize the I-IV-V intervals, no argument there.
Here's what I'm thinking, correct me if I'm wrong. The OP has a vocabulary in all manner of unique things except music and frequencies.
Actually I started classical piano lessons at the age of 5 at McPhail School for the Arts in Minneapolis and then my last two years of high school I took private music ear training and orchestration from a former University of Minnesota music Professor. So then I performed a solo piano classical concert as a teenager -- performing Brahms, Mozart, Bach, John Cage and other pieces by memory.
When I entered college I focused on music composition but since I had done private training already I tested into the third level for music theory and then I composed a fugue. Then I took music composition at Smith College and private piano performance at Smith College. Then I transferred to UW-Madison and I was accepted into the music composition department.
The UW-Madison music composition department bragged that their graduates went on to the Ivy League schools where the professors had studied and the focus was on computer music generated formally using mathematics. There was an option to choose your own music composition focus so I focused on third world music. I disagreed with the music composition professors and then one of them claimed my orchestration transcription of a Schoenberg piano sonata to string quartet was communist! Then he said to redo my previous orchestration pieces even though I had already been graded on them and I had received As or Bs. So I then dropped out of the music composition program since it was obvious the professors were not being fair for whatever reason and it wasn't worth arguing about it.
By this time in high school I had also sang in choirs -- church and school -- the school was professional and toured the U.S. and recorded a c.d. I also played in a jazz band, a roots reggae band, a hardcore punk-country band and a blues band. So I had played some bars and cafes -- but I was still only 18.
So then I continued playing free jazz at piano but by then I was continuing to explore nonwestern music scales and modes and tuning and I could no longer play Western tuning while considering it good music.
I still consider Western tuning music and I actually prefer classical and good jazz but mainly syncopated rhythm is crucial. Western tuning is considered the "materialist" tuning in Indian classical music -- so the logarithmic tuning -- or its closest parallel in Indian tuning - is not unknown but just not the only one used nor considered the best tuning.
As for music tuning -- the "programmed" philosophy of music to evoke the emotions -- this has been proven to be universal to humans. In other words what Westerners consider "sad" music or "happy" music is accepted in all human cultures.
But music has continued to rely on the basic tunings from natural consonance simple ratios. Dr. Sandy Trehub has even documented that babies naturally like consonant music while Dr. Kathleen Wermke found infants cry out in simple music ratios regularly and it's not just from exposure to music but due to auditory design. Dr. Thomas Fritz tested Western consonant tuning on the Mafa tribe in northern Cameroon – a tribe completely unexposed to Western music. The tribe correctly identified the emotions for happy, sad, and scary music. Dr. Fritz states: “The emotional expression of the music is inherent in the music itself. And it is not solely decodable through cultural imprinting.”21
21 Elena Mannes, producer, The Music Instinct: Science and Song, PBS Documentary, June 2009.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
reply to post by UncleV
Is there a method of tuning instruments using only your listening skills - no gadgets or tools?
Originally posted by elmoastro
In this thread, the OP has put it into perspective from a sociological point of view, filtered through the language of music and tied to the energy experiences of meditation and qigong.
Quiet the mind, open up to reality--even if it flies in the face of your belief (read dogma), discover the universe.
edit on 17-2-2012 by elmoastro because: (no reason given)