It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HIWATT
Since when does someone require "government permission" to travel to the antarctic? (or anywhere really)
Originally posted by Dachende
The cost involved to support these people falls largely on the NZ government, as they used NZ as their home base and are currently travelling from NZ to Antartica. Last time NZ sent out all personell they had in the area to do a search and rescue, which cost NZ a crap ton of money . They followed no safety protocols and the timing of their trip to antarctica was very unusual.
Originally posted by LongbottomLeaf
When I was kid I remember my grandfather saying the further inland you go there is less snow and ice it gives way to plains of rock and sand. Sometime in the 40's after he got back from the pacific he changed commands and got sent on some trip there when he was in the navy. Now as I'm older I read about it and whaddya know pops was telling us the truth
Originally posted by SpaceJockey1
Amazing that we WANT to spend MILLIONS trying to stop/help FOOLS, but let people suffer poverty all over the world, including here in New Zealand!
Originally posted by Essan
Originally posted by SpaceJockey1
Amazing that we WANT to spend MILLIONS trying to stop/help FOOLS, but let people suffer poverty all over the world, including here in New Zealand!
No, we want to avoid spending millions rescing fools, so that we can instead use to the money to help people in poverty all over the word, incuding in NZ.
There is finite money. If some of it is wasted on expensive rescues of incompetent romantic adventurers, there's less for other purposes. Simple.
Originally posted by LongbottomLeaf
When I was kid I remember my grandfather saying the further inland you go there is less snow and ice it gives way to plains of rock and sand. Sometime in the 40's after he got back from the pacific he changed commands and got sent on some trip there when he was in the navy. Now as I'm older I read about it and whaddya know pops was telling us the truth
Originally posted by Dachende
The main issue being reported in the media here is that they are ill-equipped and incapable of mounting a successful mission to antarctica , as they demonstrated last time they went by coming back with 2/5 crew.
The cost involved to support these people falls largely on the NZ government, as they used NZ as their home base and are currently travelling from NZ to Antartica. Last time NZ sent out all personell they had in the area to do a search and rescue, which cost NZ a crap ton of money . They followed no safety protocols and the timing of their trip to antarctica was very unusual.
This has been all over the news here for the last few days - It wouldn't suprise me if a navy vessel intercepted them on their way, and "asked" them to change their plans.
As for your theory, I do believe there is something down there that the general public isn't told about. We have multiple bases there involving numerous countries, including Russia, China, USA, New Zealand, Australia.
Something tells me , we're not being told the whole truth about that place. I'm not saying it's an entrance to "hollow earth" , but I'm pretty positive there's something else there which has not been disclosed.
edit on 25/1/2012 by Dachende because: (no reason given)