It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hapablab
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Originally posted by InsideYourMind
Originally posted by hapablab
This is a false flag if I ever seen one, SOPA and PIPA fail so lets create a cyberwar to prove how important they are.
Far from it, this is very real. No good turning everything into a conspiracy.
What are we going to do? Allow them to walk over "our internet", remove sites at will and we can all sit down and not make a peep?
I fully agree.
Seriously, what is the point that some people are trying to make by saying that this is a false flag on Anonymous' part? Perhaps these people also believe that wars will end if people hold hands and sing songs.
As far as I am concerned, you're either with the revolution or against it.
No honestly I don't put anything past our government, Yesterday SOPA and PIPA fail and today this, just connecting some dots, If I'm wrong Im wrong, and what's with that last sentence about holding hands and singing, Im no hippy and I don't get that connection lmao.
Originally posted by Gigatronix
reply to post by UkRandom
OK you're gonna have to show me something that shows that the US is ignoring more serious cybercrimes in favor of going after filesharers. If we don't want them to have jurisdiction over MU guys in New Zealand, then how can we expect them to go after hackers outside of our jurisdiction?
Originally posted by Gigatronix
reply to post by UkRandom
Here's the thing. Get people to stop stealing stuff and the Anti Cybercrime Division(or whatever it is) will have less things to worry about. The logic you seem to be using is we should let people steal and get away with it because there are people doing worse things. I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that there are multiple divisions and departments of people all over working the whole spectrum of cybercrime, from online bullying to online stock trading fraud to filesharing to kiddie porn. It is my view that we should have a defense on all fronts, not a prioritized defense that leaves gaping holes on our backside. If we just ignore filesharing and go after the big targets, whos to say that the unattended problem doesn;t grow and multiply and become unmanageable in time, possibly mutating into an avenue of attack from people looking for an unlocked back door?
Originally posted by UkRandom
im just tryin 2 say there are much bigger fish to fry out there than ppl who illegally download music
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
A lot, if not the vast majority, of this stuff is already free if I remember to set my DVR or is available for free and legally on 10000 other sites...it's simply a matter of convenience as to when and where I will watch. The corporations fighting this for the most part aren't losing billions or even millions...they're just being deprived of squeezing every last nickel out of the consumer because they're greedy for more more more. They won't provide commercial-free or on-demand material because they are GREEDY. Clearly that is not what the people want...to be enslaved to their times and their commercials and their exorbitant profit margins.
They don't have or control the highway or the willingness and are too bull-headed to partner reasonably, so I don't have an ounce of sympathy for them. Their business models are obsolete. Their payment paradigms are old (not to mention GREEDY) and they've ripped off plenty of artists and consumers over the years, so I'd call that karma. In some cases, the artists suffer a bit, but contracts should be changing by now, as information and the world is. Maybe if their high-priced legal teams could get the dollar signs out of their eyes they could work out some compromises and really define fair use fairly.
And to have the government doing their dirty work for them because they're throwing a hissy? Intolerable. Go Anonymous!
As for MegaUpload, torrentfreak.com...
As for SOPA/PIPA? Parts of the bill I like...as in the privacy parts of my not-for-profit content that corporations like Google and others make billions from by using and mining OUR data. But that's a whole other story, and of course it's not us that the corporment wants or is paid to protect.
Originally posted by Gigatronix
reply to post by UkRandom
If you think the government is wasting its time dealing with filesharers, how do you feel about them having to waste time trying to figure out what some miscreant hackers are up to? If the system for dealing with cybercrime is already bottlenecked and out of whack as it is, Anon is just adding to it for no reason other than to be part of the problem and not part of the solution. Jacking around with the government and private websites only paints a big huge target on their head, while also making them look bad to people that couldnt give a rats rump about filesharing. If they really wanted to do something meaningful they'd be hacking into politicians/big business personal files and exposing corruption and evil agendas. Flooding websites that have little to nothing to do with MU's problems is the equivalent of having a childish temper tantrum.