It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I never stated FLight 77 did not hit the Pentagon, just we do not have solid evidence that it did. You guys really should read my post.
Originally posted by Disclosed Roger just admitted Flight 77 hit the Pentagon?
There is no evidence that the passengers were in the building.
So the passengers were mutilated elsewhere, and their remains trucked to the Pentagon, to be scattered in the debris pile?
How many people died at Pearl Harbor, how many young people? They also were basically killed in cold blood when the government let the attack happen. Where and when the people on the planes were killed is anyones guess until we get all the facts.
Originally posted by weedwhacker It breaks my heart....there is not a human being who could kill them in could blood.....except those bastard terrorists.....who were blinded by their idiotic ideology. bastards......
LOL. Not at all. Read your own post. You agreed with Mary Schiavo. You can't go around lying to all of us here what you posted above, Ultima1, and trying to back out of the goof YOU made. What a hoot.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1So you admit you lied and twisted what i posted?
Originally posted by jthomas Oh, we all know that you didn't admit it outright,
We know that you know that AA77 hit the Pentagon. We also know that we do not need "official reports" to know that AA77, a Boeing 757, hit the Pentagon. But now that your own quotes show you know AA77 hit the Pentagon, any further attempts at weaseling out if it are moot.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1I never stated Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon, only that we have no hard evidnece since most of it has not been released.
Originally posted by weedwhacker [I'm not intending to pile on here, ULTIMA....but you have still to answer the question.....IF AAL77 did not crash into the Pentagon, then where are those passengers, and crew??
So you agree then, there is evidence that Flight 77 hit the building. Maybe not the solid evidence you want, but evidence? Flight 77 hit the pentagon, but just no solid evidence....Just want to be clear about that.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1 I never stated FLight 77 did not hit the Pentagon, just we do not have solid evidence that it did. You guys really should read my post.
Do you have evidence that the [assengers were someplace else then?
There is no evidence that the passengers were in the building.
Can you showm em whin the quote i posted where Mary Schiavo stated anything about FLight 77. If not you owe my an apology.
Originally posted by jthomas LOL. Not at all. Read your own post. You agreed with Mary Schiavo.
Well last post on this in this thread, if you or other are interested i can start a new thread. I guess you have not seen the declassified and decoded documents that show the government knew about the Pearl Harbor attack. There has aslo been a recent release of declassified information on the USS Liberty attack.
Originally posted by weedwhacker But, really.....Pearl Harbor?? I think that notion has been debunked to death, but if you have evidence, start a thread!
www.abovetopsecret.com... You quoted Mary Schiavo to support your case. Further reading demonstrates Mary Schiavo used the the terrorists hijackings of all four flights on 9/11 to back up HER case. You tried to cherry pick quotes to support a claim and were caught red-handed. Cherry picking quotes is intellectually dishonest. Now you're trying to weasel out of it. Sorry, Ultima1, you need to apologize to all of us.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1Can you showm em whin the quote i posted where Mary Schiavo stated anything about FLight 77. If not you owe my an apology.
Originally posted by jthomas LOL. Not at all. Read your own post. You agreed with Mary Schiavo.
Sorry i still do not see anywhere that she stated anythign about flight 77 or any evidence of flight 77 hitting the Pentagon. Can you show me the page and paragraph? [edit on 29-5-2008 by ULTIMA1]
Originally posted by jthomas You tried to cherry pick quotes to support a claim and were caught red-handed. Cherry picking quotes is intellectually dishonest. Now you're trying to weasel out of it.
Why do people state for a fact that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon whan i have proven time and time again that most of the actual evidence has not been released yet? If we went to court and you presented a case that flight 77 hit the Pentagon using the information you have now you would probably be laughed out of court. So i rest my case that the there is no evidence that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon. Until we have more evidnece.
Originally posted by weedwhacker However, when pressed, ULTIMA doesn't dismiss the idea that AAL 77 hit the Pentagon.....he just continues to say (there is no evidence to confirm) that AAL 77 hit the Pentagon. Done here.....jfj123, Del....have we rested our case yet??
Please do.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1 So i rest my case ...
Gee and people talk about my short responeses. So you do agree that there is not enough evidence to prove in court that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon? [edit on 30-5-2008 by ULTIMA1]
Originally posted by _Del_ Please do.
I do not. But I have never seen a prosecutor allowed to use burden-shifting in summation. Nor have I ever heard a defense attorney blather about aimlessly while delivering a summation either. Perhaps it would be more effective than I anticipate, but it seems unlikely. I have seen them ignore evidence, however, so you've got that going for you.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1Gee and people talk about my short responeses. So you do agree that there is not enough evidence to prove in court that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon?
Originally posted by _Del_ Please do.
Well in this case there is no evidence. I mean all they would have to do is show the bad witness statements and that there is no evidence that shows that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon. Case closed.
Originally posted by _Del_ I have seen them ignore evidence, however, so you've got that going for you.