It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Your photos are blurry, making it look like people standing there, the pic provides a more clearer picture, as well as the burning vehicles on the left side. Hope that helps. [edit on 13-7-2007 by deltaboy] [edit on 13-7-2007 by deltaboy]
Originally posted by Intheshadwos Ok, I am a newbie here and a little confused so maybe someone can help me out with some answers to these? Firstly, is this the first known photo of the pentagon hit? Is that a group of 3 people standing talking? Where in relation to this photo are the vehicles that are on fire? Thanks
Originally posted by Caustic Logic a 757 knocked a 90ft wide, 30ft high hole in the Pentagon. Please see here and couble-check before repeating this "fact." frustratingfraud.blogspot.com... I've been wide awake for entirely too long.
... i'm not a person from the truth movement....i believe a 757 hit the pentagon...and anyone that claims to get something from the five clip footage is prolly not right....i cant make out the foreground from the back ground.... but i have a very reliable friend who told me we're not being told everything....and i trust him....because he was on awacs that day above nyc....
I feel sorry for these guys' girlfriends - their careful analysis of the Pentagon evidence gets it in the wrong hole. And we all know it's not good to get germs from the fallacy hole in the truth canal.
Thanks for noticing that line... It's not quite PC or whatever...
Originally posted by wenfieldsecret...
I feel sorry for these guys' girlfriends - their careful analysis of the Pentagon evidence gets it in the wrong hole. And we all know it's not good to get germs from the fallacy hole in the truth canal.
I've tried - video evidence. It is inconclusive. BUT it doesn't conflict w/a 757 strike IMO - don't prove or disprove. Just inconclusive.
i'm not a person from the truth movement....i believe a 757 hit the pentagon...and anyone that claims to get something from the five clip footage is prolly not right....i cant make out the foreground from the back ground....
Now that sounds interesting - I'd like to learn more. Awacs - air stuff - eye in the sky - if it's real, very valuable info, and first-hand for you... please do share?
but i have a very reliable friend who told me we're not being told everything....and i trust him....because he was on awacs that day above nyc....
For more information; www.projectcamelot.net... And this is another look at it. 911truth.tripod.com... This people has done there homework well. [edit on 14/7/07 by spacevisitor] [edit on 14/7/07 by spacevisitor]
• The plane that hit the Pentagon was a small, remotely piloted Navy jet. A full-sized Boeing 757 could not have been used because the aerodynamic ground effects would have prevented it coming in so low at full speed without it having to slow right down as if to land.
I'm not sure why i keep reading this thread as it gets more and more .... (edited for content) For anyone to compare mistaken identiy to ...um mistaken airplane...or mistaken plane didn't crash into the pentagon, it flew OVER the ?? Ahhhhh this is flat out crazy. It will never matter to some in here. The evidence is right THERE! You don't want to see it.
Originally posted by ANOK ^Obvious...Many witnesses claimed to have seen Jean Charles de Menezes wearing a backpack with wires sticking out. So much for eye witness reports, huh? I don't need witnesses, I can see with my own eyes, can you?
i pretty much told you everything he told me.... "we were on our way back from an overseas TDY when 9-11 happened. it was really sad we flew for just about 24 hours untill we were relieved. We're not being told everything" he's not allowed to talk about it...we had the clearence....but not the need to know.... p.s. ground effect helps a plane just float at minimum speed when it's roughly half the wingspan from the ground....if anything it would have helped the plane be just above the ground at the pentagon.... [edit on 14-7-2007 by wenfieldsecret]
Originally posted by Caustic Logic Now that sounds interesting - I'd like to learn more. Awacs - air stuff - eye in the sky - if it's real, very valuable info, and first-hand for you... please do share?
You missed my point. It was not mistaken identity, it was witnesses claiming they saw what they didn't, or the witnesses were not really witnesses at all... You can post witness reports all day but I believe my own eyes and experience first. The evidence is NOT right there. If it was we wouldn't be here discussing it. There is NO evidence a 757 hit the pentagoon.
Originally posted by CaptainObvious For anyone to compare mistaken identiy to ...um mistaken airplane...or mistaken plane didn't crash into the pentagon, it flew OVER the ?? Ahhhhh this is flat out crazy. It will never matter to some in here. The evidence is right THERE! You don't want to see it.
No it wouldn't. An aircraft flying at 400+ mph is going to be very hard to fly at an altitude literally inches off the ground. The plane will want too climb, holding it level would be very tricky. A plane at an altitude of half its wing length can produce up to 40% extra lift. Try keeping that plane level at that speed and you'll get into trouble very quickly. Then there is the problem of the hole in the pentacon being so low the engines shrouds would have to be touching the ground.
Originally posted by wenfieldsecret ground effect helps a plane just float at minimum speed when it's roughly half the wingspan from the ground....if anything it would have helped the plane be just above the ground at the pentagon....
Bodies...Where? I haven't seen them Light poles....Planted, plane didn't even fly through the light poles. Damage...Not consistent with a Boeing 575. Debris...Very little and easily plantable. Where are all the other wheels? Where are all the engine parts and other stuff that should not have burned up? Witnesses...We already went over this. You can't trust witness reports. DNA reports...Plane burns up into nothing there aint gonna be DNA reports. I have no proof, and neither do you, so don't ask for it. Its just my opinion from experience with aircraft and government methods. There is nothing that convinces me a 575 flew that flight path, crashed into the pentacon and conveniently cleaned up its own debris... [edit on 14/7/2007 by ANOK]
Originally posted by CaptainObvious how can you say that?? You have seen the photos,(debris,bodies,damage,lightpoles) read the DNA reports, listened to the EYE-witnesses.
NIST DNA experts had to come up with new DNA testing just for 911. The DNA testing at that time was not good for testing bodies that were burnt or crushed like the bodies on Flight 77. www.nist.gov...
Originally posted by CaptainObvious how can you say that?? You have seen the photos,(debris,bodies,damage,lightpoles) read the DNA reports, listened to the EYE-witnesses.
I have the NTSB data from the Flight Data Recorder that i received from a FOIA request. The animation done by the NTSB from the Flight Data Recorder shows that the plane was ona different flight path then the official story tells, also at the time of impact the plane was at 180 feet according to the altimeter. [edit on 14-7-2007 by ULTIMA1]
Due to the nature of the World Trade Center disaster, it quickly became evident that traditional methods for performing DNA typing were not likely to be fully successful in identifying all of the recovered remains. Traditional DNA ID methods depend on the presence of long, intact segments of DNA in order to accurately type the sample. The DNA in many of the samples recovered in this situation were so fragmented that these standard methods were ineffective.
Bullcrap! You're here to find the truth? You sound like someone else here that always says that, causticfox how are you doing with your new name? How about start with learning the truth about the physics of the South Tower tilt that you and others ignore in your search for 'truth'. What 'theory'? I don't argue theories I argue the physics, and that aint theory. The physics that you de-bunkers ignore while you concentrate on de-bunking un-provable theories. How about contributing to my thread about the physics of the south tower tilt? You and all but one de-bunker stayed well away from that thread, which is usual when the real questions get asked. ROTF you're hear to learn the truth... The truth is you have nothing. The truth is you ignore all evidence of a force other than fire and gravity acting on the buildings. The truth is you ignore all the physics anomalies you can't find an answer for. OK now we've got the personal slinging out the way, how about debating the points I bring up instead of trying to shoot me down, thanx... Yes my mind is made up, but at least I made up my own mind... Edit:forgot to dot an i... [edit on 14/7/2007 by ANOK]
Originally posted by CaptainObvious I on the other hand still search for the truth.
You made my day ANOK,"causticfox" now there's alot of 757 hit the Pentagon wrapped up in one word. The longest running thread keeps on keepin' on just like my search for real authentic information thats indesputible evidence Flt. 77 hit the Pentagon. You know, serial #s, FBI reports, terrorist DNA confirmation. It's been 6 years can we see somethin' more than the same old stuff?
Originally posted by ANOK Bullcrap! You're here to find the truth? You sound like someone else here that always says that, causticfox how are you doing with your new name? Yes my mind is made up, but at least I made up my own mind... [edit on 14/7/2007 by ANOK]