It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by nightbringr
Originally posted by RizeorDie
Originally posted by nightbringr
Originally posted by superman2012
Originally posted by nightbringr
While I do not advocate the bombing of Iran, I am certainly aware of their brutal human rights record.
All we have to do is look at their leadership. Famously announcing in front of the whole world at a UN convention that there are "no gays in Iran", shortly after publicly hanging teenage gay men with the explicit permission of the government is a sure sign of a very sick government.
You should check out the US's human rights record as well. Not just the US, but every country.
Your point is?
I'm quite aware the US is corrupt in the extreme. Does that mean I cannot say the same about Iran? At least we don't publicly hang homosexuals with the governments permission.
America is a big puppet and tool used to ensure Israels supremacy over the Middle East region. Iran is the thorn in the eyes of the extremist jews and christians.
This has nothing to do with Irans homo society, this is about jew supremacy. The jew controls USA, but it can never control the Islamic republic.
Do you deny that the hung gays in the street and Ahmadinejad declared "No gays in Iran"?
I suppose the big, bad Zionists paid Ahmadinejad to say that to serve their purposes then?
edit on 8-1-2012 by nightbringr because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by superman2012
Israel is not obligated to sign the NPD, secondly Israel is not the one who is going around threatening their enemies they'll wipe them off the face of the earth with nuclear weaponry, thirdly Israel and the USA are not only very close allies but also partners in Intelligence and some areas of the military technology. Israel is so intertwined, it's more complicated than you realise.
I'm sure the Americans don't allow the NPD in to top secret locations where nuclear weaponry is being stored - and let's face it - the USA is the only country in the world who has used them. So who should we trust the most with nuclear weaponry? I'd trust Israel long before I trust the USA with them.
These "death to America" demonstrations in Iran are only in attendance of afew thousand people. The population of Iran is approx 74 million. Hellooooooooooooooooooo!
edit on 8-1-2012 by bluemirage5 because: (no reason given)
We know, that once sanctions fail, the US has to either act or back down. In this case I see action is more likely, not just to obtain its national goals in relation to Iran, but also to simply not lose face. We have seen limited diplomacy, then international diplomacy designed to engage the international community to condemn Iran and get support for the US, then we have seen further sanctions and recently we have seen gun-boat diplomacy (the US carrier passing through the strait of Hormuz). Even though the strait of Hormuz incident is unrelated to the nuclear program (i.e. the US passed through when Iran threatened closure) it is still related indirectly (i.e. Iran threatened closure due to new sanctions).
Make no mistake, the actions the US is undertaking are detremental to itself. Blowing this out of proportion and acting as if it is the end of the world only isolates Iran and closes a diplomatic option (which hasn't been properly utilized as Obama promised too). Threats of military coercion will not stop Iran. When a weaker power is backed into a corner by a stronger power, it will at a point, act to defend its intersts. If Iran backed down now, not only would it set precedent for future US-Iran relations, but Iran would also lose face as a regional power and most importantly appear weak domestically, threatening the integrity of the Islamic Regime. The US needs smart and responsible foreign policy proffesionals to deal with this. It seems as if Obama, has either hired someone who is inexpirienced or is a neocon to deal with Iran.
You mention your surprise that the US is not invading Israel, North Korea, India, or Pakistan. There are two large differences between them and Iran. One, they already have nuclear weapons. Iran claims it doesn't. Two, those countries are not violating terms of a signed NPT, Iran is.
Originally posted by britelite1971
reply to post by superman2012
Iran sounds like an awesome place to live, at least according to you. Why don't you live there if it's so great? Perhaps a little hiking near their border should do the trick.
Originally posted by k1k1to
the universe has one big giant problem...
its called the middle east.....and how do we end all the problems and conflicts?
NUKE EM ALL!
Originally posted by Frira
Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
Originally posted by RizeorDie
The jew controls USA, but it can never control the Islamic republic.
Look at the map above - I wouldn't be too confident. Iran is utterly surrounded.
We have had this discussion.
Show the location of the former Soviet bases.
Indicate which of the American bases are there at the request of those governments, and for how long.
Then, and only then will that map indicate anything worth discussing-- LIKE HISTORY!... and then you will not want to discuss it-- until it gets posted again ...
* as if not already discussed;
* as if you do not know the dishonesty if its presentation--
and in hopes that bright educated persons will not descend upon the thread and point out the historically obvious to the bunch of blog-sucking morons who have not a clue of anything that ever happened in the world prior to 2001.
Harsh letter follows.
Like I said, we have had this discussion before-- and it will go the same way.
I'm not sure in what way the US or Iran is "the Aggressor." Does it do any good now to ask "Who started it?" And when you say "lead by example," do you mean by keeping the treaty?
If the US is the aggressor when it comes to Iran, shouldn't they lead by example?
But I have to admit confusion over this:
If the US is the aggressor when it comes to Iran, shouldn't they lead by example?
I'm not sure in what way the US or Iran is "the Aggressor." Does it do any good now to ask "Who started it?" And when you say "lead by example," do you mean by keeping the treaty? I'm hoping for a change in the government and the foreign policy of both nations quickly. I don't know how to avoid war otherwise.
Originally posted by LongbottomLeaf
I'm American and I want nothing to do with any of this. I dont want a war. I dont want to be Israels friend. I dont want to be Irans friend either. I'm tired of the events of my life having to be based off bitter fools ion the other side of the planet. I am so sick and tired of having to hear about the stupid middleeast all day every day for the last 30 got dang years.