It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by vogon42
Originally posted by 547000
A parents duty is to protect his child and raise him right. What will you do if your child goes to hell because of your inability to give him any discomfort? ...
Seriously....you see nothing wrong with punishing your child for something he/she did NOT do?
What YOU call religion, others would call sadistic. (and law enforcement would classify as abuse)
you remind me of a case where a mother burned her daughter with a cigarette to "teach" her that life is painful.
Originally posted by vogon42
Originally posted by 547000
A parents duty is to protect his child and raise him right. What will you do if your child goes to hell because of your inability to give him any discomfort? ...
Seriously....you see nothing wrong with punishing your child for something he/she did NOT do?
What YOU call religion, others would call sadistic. (and law enforcement would classify as abuse)
you remind me of a case where a mother burned her daughter with a cigarette to "teach" her that life is painful.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
reply to post by vogon42
Sounds like you have a pretty jaded view of things you do not even understand nor care to understand. ...... that money goes towards feeding and clothing needy families..
The traditional concept of Hell does NOT come from the inspired Hebrew or Greek manuscripts. It is a pagan myth adopted as Christian doctrine in the third century by church fathers. Yet, then as now, innocent people are taught the traditional concept of Hell by trusted authority figures. That trust deters questions, so for hundreds of years the myth has perpetuated. The KJV and other translations have also perpetuated the myth by less than the most accurate translation of the word Hell.
Originally posted by cloudyday
I think what makes a church event traumatic for kids is when their parents haven't taught them the beliefs of that particular denomination so the kids know what to expect.
If your parents are Catholic and teach you Catholicism from the cradle then the Catholic church is probably comforting. On the other hand, I know a woman whose mother didn't go to church and a neighbor started taking her to a Catholic church without adequate instruction. The priest insisted that this little girl confess her sins but she couldn't think of anything to confess. So she was terrified of the Catholic church after that and never went back.
I had a similar experience when I about 10 years old. I was raised as an Episcopalian and we didn't use terms like being "born again" or "saved". So I went to a 2 week church camp where everyone convinced me that I was going to hell because I wasn't "saved". I kept trying to get "saved" and nothing would happen. That was a miserable 2 weeks. When I got home my mother told me not to worry about it.
So parents make the difference between a positive and negative experience for the kid.
Originally posted by 547000
reply to post by vogon42
... Do you let your child touch the stove because you feel slapping his hand away is abuse?edit on 19-12-2011 by 547000 because: (no reason given)
We take our sons to church each Wednesday and Sunday. We continually seek to guide our kids in the Christian faith by example and love. We serve in the community and volunteer our time to good causes. As compared to those in our community who do not attend church, our kids thrive and are happy. They make good choices and are the top of their class. Are there exceptions in our community, where unchurched families thrive? Yes.
>>>>>>>>Mostly because generations before had been faithful to religious practice. The generations that followed, regardless of church or belief, benefited from the love that follows one generation to the next. We are products of our past. Christianity offers a model of love and discipleship that is unmatched in the world.
Originally posted by 547000
So just leave it at "don't sin, mkay. sins are bad, mkay" and leave it to it, not even explaining why? I think you're being naive. At any rate I am glad I don't plan on having children. They won't even believe the explanation of hell until much later in their lives, mostly never. What's the use of having a child if you know they are most likely to go to such a horrible place?
Originally posted by 547000
.....What's the use of having a child if you know they are most likely to go to such a horrible place?
Originally posted by wildtimes
.... You have not studied world religions if you honestly believe this. Buddhists, who have no concept of "hell", are FAR more loving.edit on 19-12-2011 by wildtimes because: (no reason given)