It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Eye witnesses claim 'unusual' movement of Israeli missiles

page: 3
19
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 28 2011 @ 10:15 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Nov, 28 2011 @ 10:29 PM
link   
Ah...."eyewitnesses" reported the moving of these missiles. I love it!!!!



posted on Nov, 28 2011 @ 10:33 PM
link   
reply to post by JBA2848
 


you know i think you are the first person in the bevvy of threads on this topic to even bring that up and i think it is a quite relevent point and alot more people then those invovled think that place is holy i wonder what the pope would say? let alone most of South America being catholic so i think its a pretty big if that russia would do any kind of nuclear strike on israel unless they launched first and even then they would probably bomb the crap out of them conventionally just to prove a point and knowing putin set up a palestinan state in whats left with russia gaurding the fledgling state but as that problay is never going to happen(the nuking not the Palestinian state part)



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 12:49 AM
link   
i thought it was against the geneva convention to use human shields. if they care so little about their citizens, what does that say about the government.

i don't think iran will target jerusalem, but by putting missiles there, the israeli's guaranteed it will be struck if there is war.



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 02:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by JBA2848
reply to post by Evanzsayz
 


If Russia bombed Israel they would have destoryed the religious center of most of the worlds religions.
Muslim, Christians and so on.


That is why US should attack Russia ( the communism ) before it destroys Israel.



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 02:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by princeofpeace
Ah...."eyewitnesses" reported the moving of these missiles. I love it!!!!


Very interesting ,


So those eye witnesses must be none-military people , hanging around the bases.

Or , maybe the eyewitness is the guy who is afraid to attack Iran , but heshe is a military eye witness .

And military intelligence is just letting those eyewitnesses walk around freely.
edit on 29/11/11 by hmdphantom because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 02:48 AM
link   
With all the threads about the situation in the middle east in the past few days and really in every thread that has to do with war, I've seen a lot of talk about nuclear weapons and who might use them first. A lot of people think nukes are going to used for almost anything, "if they do that, nuke" if they do this, nuke. Nukes, nukes, nukes.

It's understandable these nations are moving hardware and equipment around, the possibility of war is very real.

Neither Israel, Iran, Russia, USA, India, Pakistan, UK, France, or N. Korea (the nuclear club) are going to nuke anybody. No nuclear exchange is going to ocurr without a very very good reason. No country wants to be the first to launch. Only the threath of total destruction would make a country launch nuclear weapons. Here are the current nuclear strategies:

No first use- China, India. As in they will not fire first.

Only defensive use- US, (includes NATO) UK, Israel, Russia. Nato keeps pre-emptive strike as an option


Have indicated No First use- Pakistan.

Also let's not forget MAD. (mutually assured destruction)

Also if an enemy does not have nuclear weapons, nukes don't even come into the equation for Nuclear Armed States.

So let's calm down and not say Nuke!! everytime a military event takes place. Those weapons mainly exist as a deterrent. Just my 2 cents.
edit on 29-11-2011 by Dembow because: Forgot sumthing

edit on 29-11-2011 by Dembow because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 03:03 AM
link   
reply to post by Dembow
 


but,

what if psychopaths and maniacs are manning the buttons?

what if they act in unison and "press" at the same time from all sides?

what if somebody disables all the defensive systems?

long before the financial crisis started, many people said "Oh, they will never let THAT happen"



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 03:09 AM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 





what if psychopaths and maniacs are manning the buttons?


Then it will be the time to slap those maniacs in the face and get them down.



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 03:17 AM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 


To answer your questions:

Probably already are, being crazy doesn't mean stupid.

They acting in unison? Possible, however very unlikely. What would they do with a wasteland?

If defensive systems go down then they're all on the same boat. Let's remember ICBM's have never been used in war, only tested. No one knows for sure how the missiles are going to perform or the defensive systems.

Losing money and the mass destruction of whole nations are not in the same category, again Crazy doesn't equal estupid. Want to see a true weapon of mass destruction? The ak-47 has killed far more people than nukes.



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 03:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by hmdphantom
reply to post by xuenchen
 





what if psychopaths and maniacs are manning the buttons?


Then it will be the time to slap those maniacs in the face and get them down.


and WHO gets to decide who is a maniac?

the foxes in charge?



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 03:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by Dembow
reply to post by xuenchen
 


To answer your questions:

Probably already are, being crazy doesn't mean stupid.

They acting in unison? Possible, however very unlikely. What would they do with a wasteland?

If defensive systems go down then they're all on the same boat. Let's remember ICBM's have never been used in war, only tested. No one knows for sure how the missiles are going to perform or the defensive systems.

Losing money and the mass destruction of whole nations are not in the same category, again Crazy doesn't equal estupid. Want to see a true weapon of mass destruction? The ak-47 has killed far more people than nukes.


What if they have a way to control everything from a remote safe location?

Their money is already in a remote safe location.

check the net foreign assets of all these "loyalist" and anti west nations.

they have been investing transferring wealth for decades.



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 03:43 AM
link   
No wonder Europe wants a missile defense system.



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 03:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by JBA2848
reply to post by Evanzsayz
 


If Russia bombed Israel they would have destoryed the religious center of most of the worlds religions.
Muslim, Christians and so on.


And what do you think Iran happens to be? A staplepoint of Islam.



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 04:19 AM
link   
I wonder what 'unusual' movement is in comparison. Do they take them on day trips to get out and get some fresh air or and this is a more overnight stint at a motel ..............?



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 08:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by xuenchen

Originally posted by hmdphantom
reply to post by xuenchen
 





what if psychopaths and maniacs are manning the buttons?


Then it will be the time to slap those maniacs in the face and get them down.


and WHO gets to decide who is a maniac?

the foxes in charge?



The same person that understands



psychopaths and maniacs are manning the buttons



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 03:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Evanzsayz
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
 


LOL you really think Israel stands a chance against Russia just because they have nukes? That right there is funny as hell.


I dont' believe I said that anywhere - can yuo show where you think I did???



5 Nukes and Israel is back in the stoneage, and how will those jericho missiles reach moscow if Russia strikes first and completely wipes out their capabilities?


they won't of course - strawman argument.

Do you think Moscow wants to take the chance? Do they know where each of those missiles is at all times? Or where the Israeli submarine launched cruise missiles that may have nuclear warheads are at all times too??



posted on Nov, 30 2011 @ 06:42 AM
link   
S+Freply to post by TrueAmerican
 


I owe you an apology, I hope this is not taken off as being "off topic" as I write this in response to my accusations that the Source of True Americans thread was linked to Faal or David Booth.

Therefore I questioned the validity of the story, and am now going to rectify that, so imho it is "on topic" as it related to the worthiness of the readers attention and belief in the information being presented.

TA I was only in jest in my response to you about Ban thread, you have been an member for longer than me, and in fact are one of the longest serving members of ATS, and the amount of time and work and quality you add to the community is huge, I never have thought any less of you than an integral part of the community.

I did the actual thing I accused you of "check sources" when I was checking the source of your story I came across what I have later found out to be one of "David Booths" faals" own ramblings packaged somewhere else. Stating that he was in close "partnership" with WND and also they were going to work together as his "sources". I have found since usual rubbish, and just because some years ago WND linked to one of their stories.

I do not personally though having said that, particularly like or trust Farah, but that is personal, there is no ATS "view" as such on linking to him, and anyway he is not linked to Booth as I stated.

I am sorry if in any way my response affected or derailed the thread, if you want get both my posts on page 1 removed by Mods I am very happy for that. Like you TA I am just keen to make sure the "truth" is reported in this world of lies and spin, but I jumped before I looked.

Sorry again and thank you for you calm and courteous manner in the midst of the false accusation from me.
.............................................................................................................................................
On your story Hezbollah is preparing under similar lines as Israel:


Hizbullah has canceled leaves and is preparing for war, according to the Kuwaiti newspaper As-Seyassah.

“Hizbullah cancelled the vacations of all its militants, summoned thousands of its members and gave orders to its prominent officials to remain unseen in case a war broke out,” the daily said.

It added that the terrorist army and political party put its combat units, including missile units, on extreme alert. The newspaper also reported that the IDF is aware of Hizbullah’s preparations and has increased reconnaissance flights over southern Lebanon.

Hizbullah’s general mobilization also includes orders for senior officials to find a place to hide in the event that war breaks out.
INN

and a few days ago their leader said:


Hezbollah chief Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah, in recent televised speech, warned that any attack against allies Syria or Iran would engulf the entire region, hinting at the possibility of opening Lebanon’s southern front against the Jewish state.

Nasrallah has repeatedly stated it is well equipped and ready for any possible future war with Israel
2

It seems all sides are posturing and the borders are tense all around Israel as normal, but it seems to be an "air of anticipation" which I have not seen in previous such spats before, all sides seem to think Waror confrontation is imminent, and if they believe so what really can be done from the west to stop it, and then by ties to Israel be drawn into a wider conflict?
Not much we can do Is my concern.

Kind Regards,

Elf



posted on Nov, 30 2011 @ 10:15 AM
link   
Lol, apologies. This thread cracks me up.


What the “eye witnesses” saw was a

jet's external fuel tank

, probably belonged to a Dassault 'Mirage'.
Some of them have never seen this kind of objects, let alone this close, which caused some panic (which means nervous citizens by reporters who love to exaggerate)

www.mako.co.il...

rotter.net...

I would be very surprised if more than a 100 Israelis saw a Jerico III missile. I'm absolutely sure, no Palestinian ever saw one or know what it looks like.



posted on Nov, 30 2011 @ 12:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by gravitational
Lol, apologies. This thread cracks me up.


What the “eye witnesses” saw was a

jet's external fuel tank

, probably belonged to a Dassault 'Mirage'.
Some of them have never seen this kind of objects, let alone this close, which caused some panic (which means nervous citizens by reporters who love to exaggerate)

www.mako.co.il...

rotter.net...

I would be very surprised if more than a 100 Israelis saw a Jerico III missile. I'm absolutely sure, no Palestinian ever saw one or know what it looks like.


Well first, it may not matter to you, but I appreciate Elf's sincerity, and I graciously accept the apology. No problems here Elf, but it seemed a bit odd. And instead of a heated reply, I used the alert feature- something I am going to do more of in the future to avoid getting myself banned. It's not personal.

Google translation:

Jerusalem police [said] that this is an old missile was not usable and under police escort to the camp near Jerusalem crowns. "With the receipt of the request, the police came there and found a civilian truck driver leads IDF service."


So it was a missile, just not a Jericho. Ok, that about sums it up. I guess.



new topics

top topics



 
19
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join