OWS Website Bans Alex Jones

reply to post by seabag

Yup i read it and i went to your source. Tried to cross reference your sites info on any google news and found NOTHING. You've already decided what you believe though. Already shut yourself to other possibilities.

Originally posted by jlv70
reply to post by seabag

 

I know they didn't get any money out of Soros:

(Reuters) - George Soros isn't a financial backer of the Wall Street protests, despite speculation by critics including radio host Rush Limbaugh that the billionaire investor has helped fuel the anti-capitalist movement.

Source:www.reuters.com...

That is complete propaganda! You tried this once before defending Soros, didn’t you? In fact, the Tides Foundation, Adbusters, MoveOn.org, Media Matters are all funders of OWS.

reply to post by seabag


I'm not trying anything, facts are facts, you're the one that chooses to ignore them because they don't happen to jibe with your opinions.
Reuters tried to link Soros with OWS right from the get go, that's why the had to retract their first article and put this one out.
www.reuters.com...

reply to post by seabag


Take a look at your HERO...AJ talks a good game but in reality he is an arrogant thug hisself. That stands true regardless of OWS.

Originally posted by blarged
reply to post by seabag

 

You've already decided what you believe though. Already shut yourself to other possibilities.

You must be talking about yourself. This link and this link set the stage farely well. If you choose not to believe it then that says more about you than it does about me. I don't keep my head burried in the sand and block things out that are uncomfortable. There are dozens of sites that link Soros to OWS. Heck, you can find a ton of them by a search here on ATS.

reply to post by EspyderMan


Both our points prove a hunger for power. Not all OWS people crave it but it's blatant when a select few get to decide what info gets passed around.

reply to post by seabag

HA! You think some random guys YT video has more legitimacy then a real news source. Getting a bit desperate? I'll ask again: Show me a legitimate news provider or transaction proof. Im not denying that you could be right. But you are failing to present an unbiased news source that i can read without having someones political fears plugged into me.

This isn't the 1950's anymore. Nobody gives a crap about the communist party anymore. The red scare is over.

EDIT:
Your news sources you provided were the first ones i read from your old post. Try again from somewhere else that isnt pushing their biased views please

Originally posted by romanmel
reply to post by seabag

 

Take a look at your HERO...AJ talks a good game but in reality he is an arrogant thug hisself. That stands true regardless of OWS.

I don’t give two $hits about AJ. He’s not my hero…..he’s just a guy fighting against a lot of what I thought OWS was fighting against.

I was pointing out the complete and utter hypocrisy of OWS for banning people they don’t like.

You can continue bagging on him all you want It’s really funny how much you despise AJ.

Did he hurt your feelings at some point in your life?

reply to post by seabag


You say you don't care about Alex Jones but your thread is titled, "OWS Website Bans Alex Jones". My question is, if you don't care about AJ why cry over the fact he is banned from OWS?

No, AJ didn't do anything to me. I am an independant thinker and research for myself. My research indicates AJ is out for AJ. Bill Cooper said it best...

The website is not banning topics about Alex Jones. It is an anti-spam policy.

I just looked at the website again and there are threads about Alex Jones

Here's two of them

Don't Ignore Alex Jones

Was Alex Jones wrong?

Here's a thread about Ron Paul

How to talk to a Ron Lawl Supporter

Originally posted by blarged
reply to post by seabag

 

HA! You think some random guys YT video has more legitimacy then a real news source. Getting a bit desperate? I'll ask again: Show me a legitimate news provider or transaction proof. Im not denying that you could be right. But you are failing to present an unbiased news source that i can read without having someones political fears plugged into me.

This isn't the 1950's anymore. Nobody gives a crap about the communist party anymore. The red scare is over.

EDIT:
Your news sources you provided were the first ones i read from your old post. Try again from somewhere else that isnt pushing their biased views please

edit on 22/11/11 by blarged because: (no reason given)

You consider everything biased when you disagree with it, so I can’t win with you!

How about:

link
link
link
link
link

That's 5 minutes of searching. I could go on and on all day. You guys really need to stop fighting this……its getting beyond absurd at this point

reply to post by MathiasAndrew


At the time the threads title was valid. Those examples are less than 24 hours old.
The site in question got a lot of heat and changed the status accordingly.

Why Icke? What has he done wrong?

www.davidicke.com...

He seems to have said some very supportive stuff from the little i read.

Originally posted by bicnarok
if he was such a dangerous rebel to those in power he´d have been taken out by now.

would that convince you? lol.

I like all these nitwits in here slamming on AJ. AJ is an egotistical blow hard, he blows stuff out of proportion, and LIKE ALL HUMAN BEINGS has been wrong.

Saying that, he has done more than any of you people on here. Those of you who think you are a free thinker you would take the good from AJ or any other source and leave the bad. Except all you twits are too dumb to realize that everyone has an agenda, EVEN if they are giving you a good product..


I listen to AJ and he has become unbearable to hear recently, he does however have some good information if you weed out through all his bs.

The OWS movement is crap. There is no defined agenda, I get all sorts of mixed messages from them. I find it hard to follow or listen to them since there is no head to their movement saying what they are about. All sorts of groups are said to be in their movement and I have a hard time supporting them.


Although for better or for worse I do not wish to censor them as they have censored AJ. Whether it be for spamming or not. YOu can make innocent legit rules work for you when something is not going your way. So those of you saying that it is merely to combat spamming.. please how stupid do you think we are.. Just like the cops are using rules to vacate the ows people the ows website is using rules to route AJ out. Its funny how people do not see the flip side of things.. yeah great thinkers the lot of you..


.. but knowing AJ i would not be surprised if eh blew this out of proportion as welll.. his ego has been rampant lately. He is excited, people are finally beginning to wake up , but he funny part is that he is being left out.. and still getting pegged a loon.

reply to post by seabag


that film reminded of a series of photographs about the war against terrorism, in which the same islamic woman would appear, wearing different clothes, in different cities, crying about the death of her significant other or child in the photographed scene. and it was always the same lady. you wouldn't realize that if you hadn't been looking closely at the images for something else. she had the same scars, the same markings, the same facial features, etc, just photographed mourning the loss of someone else in the photo, differnet places, times of day, days of the week. i thought that was so weird. never did figure out what the point of that was

I Miss the Original Meaning of the Occupy 99%

Now it Seems its Run by Collage Kids that has Parents or Born into the Family is Mostly Rich Wealthy Kiss Assing Those One % that are Involved with the 1% in some way or another ...

occupywallst website

Non-Liberals should co-opt the movement then find out what 99% of the people want.

OWS taken over by fascists?

They always were.

Seems they don't like that the majority of their supporters are anti-police conspiracy theorists who listen to Alex Jones and agree with that lunatic's rants so they're trying to distance themselves from their only supporters.

And this is what ATS members have supported for months?

Mega facepalm.

reply to post by seabag


"spamming" is a bit different then mentioning someone. I am a little concerned though they do not want to discuss any conspiracy theory. OWS is in a sense a conspiracy theory.