It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by milkyway12
China is about containment. Its not about invading. if we go to war with China , it will be a Naval / Air war , as invading would get many people killed. We would bomb them back to the stone age. The Marines are there if they decide to use infantry to try and push their way across the ocean , and island hop.
Marines can slow them down.
Seriously if the US and China have a war who will supply the US military with replacement parts for their planes, boats and things since all manufacturing is now done by the enemy?
Originally posted by zorgon
reply to post by crackerjack
Isn't Australia the 51st state? I mean we have so many bases there already they might as well be
Originally posted by skitzspiricy
Can i ask something. I'm not very knowledgable in this area.
Are there any bases in the US that are not US bases?
Originally posted by crackerjack
US marines to set up in Darwin, Australia
www.news.com.au
(visit the link for the full news article)
THE US will have a permanent new military presence in Australia by rotating marines through a base in Darwin,
US President Barack Obama is set to announce.
This is all about the rise of China, the modernisation of the People's Liberation Army and, particularly, it's about the increased vulnerability of US forces in Japan and Guam to the new generation of Chinese missiles,
"The new Chinese missiles could threaten them in a way they've never been able to before.
Originally posted by zorgon
reply to post by crackerjack
Isn't Australia the 51st state? I mean we have so many bases there already they might as well be
I read the article - and it seems like a lot of posturing to me. I mean, if they are truly worried about a missile strike from China - in Australia - then why did they just list the exact location of the base that our marines will be?? We're obviously not trying to hide the fact - so clearly it is just a chess move.
Originally posted by Komodo
reply to post by followingpythagoras
I read the article - and it seems like a lot of posturing to me. I mean, if they are truly worried about a missile strike from China - in Australia - then why did they just list the exact location of the base that our marines will be?? We're obviously not trying to hide the fact - so clearly it is just a chess move.
My thought exactly~! Star for this.. Tactics, strategy & don't forget deception.. all of which is Sun Tzu's concepts.. BIG announcement.. "CHINA.. FYI>>we're planting 10,000 troops on Aussie soil just so you know.. what we're doing~!"
Personally, it's a head-jerk move from the WH to take our attn away from the middle east, IRAN specifically .. and don't forget .. ALL the world will be watching TV when the fake POTUS takes to the airwaves..
Not just China.. there ARE more countries that just China with an agenda
Originally posted by steveknows
Please name these "so many bases" you already have in Australia And don't use Pine gap as it's a joint observation base. I don't expect a reply because you won't find anything to back up what you've said because it's not true.
Naval Communication Station Harold E. Holt is located on the northwest coast of Australia, 6 kilometres (4 mi) north of the town of Exmouth, Western Australia. The town of Exmouth was built at the same time as the communications station to provide support to the base and to house dependent families of U.S. Navy personnel.
Wiki
Tactics, strategy & don't forget deception.. all of which is Sun Tzu's concepts..
Originally posted by cerebralassassins
Whats funny is the fact that noone asked why the hell is the navy involved in a secured land operational base when the term " navy " points to sea bound an all its glory.
Originally posted by cerebralassassins
www.youtube.com...